walkero
/
cppcheck
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases 1 Wiki Activity
cppcheck/test/testcondition.cpp

1542 lines
59 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

Moved several condition checks from checkOther to checkCondition (former checkAssignIf)
2014-08-29 17:06:46 +02:00
/*
* Cppcheck - A tool for static C/C++ code analysis
Updated copyright year to 2015
2015-01-03 12:14:58 +01:00
* Copyright (C) 2007-2015 Daniel Marjamäki and Cppcheck team.
Moved several condition checks from checkOther to checkCondition (former checkAssignIf)
2014-08-29 17:06:46 +02:00
*
* This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
* the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
* (at your option) any later version.
*
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
* GNU General Public License for more details.
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
* along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
*/
#include "tokenize.h"
#include "checkcondition.h"
#include "testsuite.h"
Fixed #5906 (false negative: 'else if' expression is always false (use library to determine if function is pure))
2015-01-10 12:21:55 +01:00
#include <tinyxml2.h>
Moved several condition checks from checkOther to checkCondition (former checkAssignIf)
2014-08-29 17:06:46 +02:00
class TestCondition : public TestFixture {
public:
astyle formatting
2014-11-20 14:20:09 +01:00
TestCondition() : TestFixture("TestCondition") {
Moved several condition checks from checkOther to checkCondition (former checkAssignIf)
2014-08-29 17:06:46 +02:00
}
private:
astyle formatting
2014-11-20 14:20:09 +01:00
void run() {
Moved several condition checks from checkOther to checkCondition (former checkAssignIf)
2014-08-29 17:06:46 +02:00
TEST_CASE(assignAndCompare); // assignment and comparison don't match
TEST_CASE(mismatchingBitAnd); // overlapping bitmasks
TEST_CASE(compare); // mismatching LHS/RHS in comparison
TEST_CASE(multicompare); // mismatching comparisons
TEST_CASE(duplicateIf); // duplicate conditions in if and else-if
New check: Warn about constant expression if ( unknown | non_null_constant) (#6519)
2015-02-22 13:09:39 +01:00
TEST_CASE(checkBadBitmaskCheck);
Moved several condition checks from checkOther to checkCondition (former checkAssignIf)
2014-08-29 17:06:46 +02:00
TEST_CASE(incorrectLogicOperator1);
TEST_CASE(incorrectLogicOperator2);
TEST_CASE(incorrectLogicOperator3);
TEST_CASE(incorrectLogicOperator4);
TEST_CASE(incorrectLogicOperator5); // complex expressions
TEST_CASE(incorrectLogicOperator6); // char literals
TEST_CASE(incorrectLogicOperator7); // opposite expressions: (expr || !expr)
Fixed #6019 (false negative: Expression is always true/false '!(v!=10) && !(v!=20)')
2015-07-13 20:53:49 +02:00
TEST_CASE(incorrectLogicOperator8); // !
#6069 False positive incorrectLogicOperator due to dynamic_cast. Run CheckCondition::checkIncorrectLogicOperator on non-simplified tokenlist.
2015-07-30 10:30:30 +02:00
TEST_CASE(incorrectLogicOperator9);
Moved several condition checks from checkOther to checkCondition (former checkAssignIf)
2014-08-29 17:06:46 +02:00
TEST_CASE(secondAlwaysTrueFalseWhenFirstTrueError);
TEST_CASE(incorrectLogicOp_condSwapping);
Refactoring to address some issues from #5895 (handling of unsigned numbers). Also adding a TODO testcase since the real issue (FP) is still not fixed
2015-06-13 18:08:13 +02:00
TEST_CASE(testBug5895);
#5309 False positive: redundantCondition - comparing large integer values (unsigned long long). Testcase added, issue got fixed before.
2015-06-20 12:18:24 +02:00
TEST_CASE(testBug5309);
Moved several condition checks from checkOther to checkCondition (former checkAssignIf)
2014-08-29 17:06:46 +02:00
TEST_CASE(modulo);
TEST_CASE(oppositeInnerCondition);
TEST_CASE(clarifyCondition1); // if (a = b() < 0)
TEST_CASE(clarifyCondition2); // if (a & b == c)
TEST_CASE(clarifyCondition3); // if (! a & b)
TEST_CASE(clarifyCondition4); // ticket #3110
TEST_CASE(clarifyCondition5); // #3609 CWinTraits<WS_CHILD|WS_VISIBLE>..
TEST_CASE(clarifyCondition6); // #3818
Fixed #4842 (condition is always true (variable is assigned constant value and then used in condition))
2015-07-17 15:30:23 +02:00
TEST_CASE(alwaysTrue);
Moved several condition checks from checkOther to checkCondition (former checkAssignIf)
2014-08-29 17:06:46 +02:00
}
Removed "verify" code in testrunner. Fixing its messages reduces the accuracy of the test suite.
2015-07-25 14:17:55 +02:00
void check(const char code[], const char* filename = "test.cpp") {
Moved several condition checks from checkOther to checkCondition (former checkAssignIf)
2014-08-29 17:06:46 +02:00
// Clear the error buffer..
errout.str("");
Settings settings;
settings.addEnabled("style");
settings.addEnabled("warning");
CheckCondition checkCondition;
// Tokenize..
Tokenizer tokenizer(&settings, this);
std::istringstream istr(code);
tokenizer.tokenize(istr, filename);
checkCondition.runChecks(&tokenizer, &settings, this);
tokenizer.simplifyTokenList2();
checkCondition.runSimplifiedChecks(&tokenizer, &settings, this);
}
astyle formatting
2014-11-20 14:20:09 +01:00
void assignAndCompare() {
Moved several condition checks from checkOther to checkCondition (former checkAssignIf)
2014-08-29 17:06:46 +02:00
// &
check("void foo(int x)\n"
"{\n"
" int y = x & 4;\n"
" if (y == 3);\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:3] -> [test.cpp:4]: (style) Mismatching assignment and comparison, comparison 'y==3' is always false.\n", errout.str());
check("void foo(int x)\n"
"{\n"
" int y = x & 4;\n"
" if (y != 3);\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:3] -> [test.cpp:4]: (style) Mismatching assignment and comparison, comparison 'y!=3' is always true.\n", errout.str());
// |
check("void foo(int x) {\n"
" int y = x | 0x14;\n"
" if (y == 0x710);\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2] -> [test.cpp:3]: (style) Mismatching assignment and comparison, comparison 'y==1808' is always false.\n", errout.str());
check("void foo(int x) {\n"
" int y = x | 0x14;\n"
" if (y == 0x71f);\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
// various simple assignments
check("void foo(int x) {\n"
" int y = (x+1) | 1;\n"
" if (y == 2);\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2] -> [test.cpp:3]: (style) Mismatching assignment and comparison, comparison 'y==2' is always false.\n", errout.str());
check("void foo() {\n"
" int y = 1 | x();\n"
" if (y == 2);\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2] -> [test.cpp:3]: (style) Mismatching assignment and comparison, comparison 'y==2' is always false.\n", errout.str());
// multiple conditions
check("void foo(int x) {\n"
" int y = x & 4;\n"
" if ((y == 3) && (z == 1));\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2] -> [test.cpp:3]: (style) Mismatching assignment and comparison, comparison 'y==3' is always false.\n", errout.str());
check("void foo(int x) {\n"
" int y = x & 4;\n"
" if ((x==123) || ((y == 3) && (z == 1)));\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2] -> [test.cpp:3]: (style) Mismatching assignment and comparison, comparison 'y==3' is always false.\n", errout.str());
check("void f(int x) {\n"
" int y = x & 7;\n"
" if (setvalue(&y) && y != 8);\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
// recursive checking into scopes
check("void f(int x) {\n"
" int y = x & 7;\n"
" if (z) y=0;\n"
" else { if (y==8); }\n" // always false
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2] -> [test.cpp:4]: (style) Mismatching assignment and comparison, comparison 'y==8' is always false.\n", errout.str());
// while
check("void f(int x) {\n"
" int y = x & 7;\n"
" while (y==8);\n" // local variable => always false
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2] -> [test.cpp:3]: (style) Mismatching assignment and comparison, comparison 'y==8' is always false.\n", errout.str());
check("void f(int x) {\n"
" extern int y; y = x & 7;\n"
" while (y==8);\n" // non-local variable => no error
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
// calling function
check("void f(int x) {\n"
" int y = x & 7;\n"
" do_something();\n"
" if (y==8);\n" // local variable => always false
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2] -> [test.cpp:4]: (style) Mismatching assignment and comparison, comparison 'y==8' is always false.\n", errout.str());
check("void f(int x) {\n"
" int y = x & 7;\n"
" do_something(&y);\n" // passing variable => no error
" if (y==8);\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
check("void do_something(int);\n"
"void f(int x) {\n"
" int y = x & 7;\n"
" do_something(y);\n"
" if (y==8);\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:3] -> [test.cpp:5]: (style) Mismatching assignment and comparison, comparison 'y==8' is always false.\n", errout.str());
check("void f(int x) {\n"
" extern int y; y = x & 7;\n"
" do_something();\n"
" if (y==8);\n" // non-local variable => no error
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
// #4434 : false positive: ?:
check("void f(int x) {\n"
" x = x & 1;\n"
" x = x & 1 ? 1 : -1;\n"
" if(x != -1) { }\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
// #4735
check("void f() {\n"
" int x = *(char*)&0x12345678;\n"
" if (x==18) { }\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
// bailout: no variable info
check("void foo(int x) {\n"
" y = 2 | x;\n" // y not declared => no error
" if(y == 1) {}\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
// bailout: negative number
check("void foo(int x) {\n"
" int y = -2 | x;\n" // negative number => no error
" if (y==1) {}\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
// bailout: pass variable to function
check("void foo(int x) {\n"
" int y = 2 | x;\n"
" bar(&y);\n" // pass variable to function => no error
" if (y==1) {}\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
// no crash on unary operator& (#5643)
check("SdrObject* ApplyGraphicToObject() {\n"
" if (&rHitObject) {}\n"
" else if (rHitObject.IsClosedObj() && !&rHitObject) { }\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
// #5695: increment
check("void f(int a0, int n) {\n"
" int c = a0 & 3;\n"
" for (int a = 0; a < n; a++) {\n"
" c++;\n"
" if (c == 4)\n"
" c = 0;\n"
" }\n"
"}\n");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
Fixed #6662 (False positive assignIfError (assignment in while condition))
2015-06-20 16:23:16 +02:00
check("void f(int a) {\n" // #6662
" int x = a & 1;\n"
" while (x <= 4) {\n"
" if (x != 5) {}\n"
" }\n"
"}\n");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2] -> [test.cpp:4]: (style) Mismatching assignment and comparison, comparison 'x!=5' is always true.\n", errout.str());
check("void f(int a) {\n" // #6662
" int x = a & 1;\n"
" while ((x += 4) < 10) {\n"
" if (x != 5) {}\n"
" }\n"
"}\n");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
Moved several condition checks from checkOther to checkCondition (former checkAssignIf)
2014-08-29 17:06:46 +02:00
}
astyle formatting
2014-11-20 14:20:09 +01:00
void mismatchingBitAnd() {
Moved several condition checks from checkOther to checkCondition (former checkAssignIf)
2014-08-29 17:06:46 +02:00
check("void f(int a) {\n"
" int b = a & 0xf0;\n"
" b &= 1;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2] -> [test.cpp:3]: (style) Mismatching bitmasks. Result is always 0 (X = Y & 0xf0; Z = X & 0x1; => Z=0).\n", errout.str());
check("void f(int a) {\n"
" int b = a & 0xf0;\n"
" int c = b & 1;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2] -> [test.cpp:3]: (style) Mismatching bitmasks. Result is always 0 (X = Y & 0xf0; Z = X & 0x1; => Z=0).\n", errout.str());
check("void f(int a) {\n"
" int b = a;"
" switch (x) {\n"
" case 1: b &= 1; break;\n"
" case 2: b &= 2; break;\n"
" };\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
}
astyle formatting
2014-11-20 14:20:09 +01:00
void compare() {
Moved several condition checks from checkOther to checkCondition (former checkAssignIf)
2014-08-29 17:06:46 +02:00
check("void foo(int x)\n"
"{\n"
" if ((x & 4) == 3);\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:3]: (style) Expression '(X & 0x4) == 0x3' is always false.\n", errout.str());
check("void foo(int x)\n"
"{\n"
" if ((x | 4) == 3);\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:3]: (style) Expression '(X | 0x4) == 0x3' is always false.\n", errout.str());
check("void foo(int x)\n"
"{\n"
" if ((x | 4) != 3);\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:3]: (style) Expression '(X | 0x4) != 0x3' is always true.\n", errout.str());
check("void foo(int x)\n"
"{\n"
" if ((x & y & 4 & z ) == 3);\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:3]: (style) Expression '(X & 0x4) == 0x3' is always false.\n", errout.str());
}
astyle formatting
2014-11-20 14:20:09 +01:00
void multicompare() {
Moved several condition checks from checkOther to checkCondition (former checkAssignIf)
2014-08-29 17:06:46 +02:00
check("void foo(int x)\n"
"{\n"
" if (x & 7);\n"
" else { if (x == 1); }\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:4]: (style) Expression is always false because 'else if' condition matches previous condition at line 3.\n", errout.str());
check("void foo(int x)\n"
"{\n"
" if (x & 7);\n"
" else { if (x & 1); }\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:4]: (style) Expression is always false because 'else if' condition matches previous condition at line 3.\n", errout.str());
Fixed #5906 (false negative: 'else if' expression is always false (use library to determine if function is pure))
2015-01-10 12:21:55 +01:00
check("extern int bar() __attribute__((pure));\n"
"void foo(int x)\n"
"{\n"
" if ( bar() >1 && b) {}\n"
" else if (bar() >1 && b) {}\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:5]: (style) Expression is always false because 'else if' condition matches previous condition at line 4.\n", errout.str());
checkPureFunction("extern int bar();\n"
"void foo(int x)\n"
"{\n"
" if ( bar() >1 && b) {}\n"
" else if (bar() >1 && b) {}\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:5]: (style) Expression is always false because 'else if' condition matches previous condition at line 4.\n", errout.str());
Moved several condition checks from checkOther to checkCondition (former checkAssignIf)
2014-08-29 17:06:46 +02:00
}
Fixed #5906 (false negative: 'else if' expression is always false (use library to determine if function is pure))
2015-01-10 12:21:55 +01:00
void checkPureFunction(const char code[]) {
// Clear the error buffer..
errout.str("");
const char cfg[] = "<?xml version=\"1.0\"?>\n"
"<def>\n"
" <function name=\"bar\"> <pure/> </function>\n"
"</def>";
tinyxml2::XMLDocument xmldoc;
xmldoc.Parse(cfg, sizeof(cfg));
Settings settings;
settings.addEnabled("style");
settings.addEnabled("warning");
settings.library.load(xmldoc);
// Tokenize..
Tokenizer tokenizer(&settings, this);
std::istringstream istr(code);
tokenizer.tokenize(istr, "test.cpp");
CheckCondition checkCondition;
checkCondition.runChecks(&tokenizer, &settings, this);
tokenizer.simplifyTokenList2();
checkCondition.runSimplifiedChecks(&tokenizer, &settings, this);
}
astyle formatting
2014-11-20 14:20:09 +01:00
void duplicateIf() {
Moved several condition checks from checkOther to checkCondition (former checkAssignIf)
2014-08-29 17:06:46 +02:00
check("void f(int a, int &b) {\n"
" if (a) { b = 1; }\n"
" else { if (a) { b = 2; } }\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:3]: (style) Expression is always false because 'else if' condition matches previous condition at line 2.\n", errout.str());
check("void f(int a, int &b) {\n"
" if (a) { b = 1; }\n"
" else { if (a) { b = 2; } }\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:3]: (style) Expression is always false because 'else if' condition matches previous condition at line 2.\n", errout.str());
check("void f(int a, int &b) {\n"
" if (a == 1) { b = 1; }\n"
" else { if (a == 2) { b = 2; }\n"
" else { if (a == 1) { b = 3; } } }\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:4]: (style) Expression is always false because 'else if' condition matches previous condition at line 2.\n", errout.str());
check("void f(int a, int &b) {\n"
" if (a == 1) { b = 1; }\n"
" else { if (a == 2) { b = 2; }\n"
" else { if (a == 2) { b = 3; } } }\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:4]: (style) Expression is always false because 'else if' condition matches previous condition at line 3.\n", errout.str());
check("void f(int a, int &b) {\n"
" if (a++) { b = 1; }\n"
" else { if (a++) { b = 2; }\n"
" else { if (a++) { b = 3; } } }\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
check("void f(int a, int &b) {\n"
" if (!strtok(NULL, \" \")) { b = 1; }\n"
" else { if (!strtok(NULL, \" \")) { b = 2; } }\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
check("void f(int a, int &b) {\n"
" x = x / 2;\n"
" if (x < 100) { b = 1; }\n"
" else { x = x / 2; if (x < 100) { b = 2; } }\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
check("void f(int i) {\n"
" if(i == 0x02e2000000 || i == 0xa0c6000000)\n"
" foo(i);\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
// ticket 3689 ( avoid false positive )
check("int fitInt(long long int nValue){\n"
" if( nValue < 0x7fffffffLL )\n"
" {\n"
" return 32;\n"
" }\n"
" if( nValue < 0x7fffffffffffLL )\n"
" {\n"
" return 48;\n"
" }\n"
" else {\n"
" if( nValue < 0x7fffffffffffffffLL )\n"
" {\n"
" return 64;\n"
" } else\n"
" {\n"
" return -1;\n"
" }\n"
" }\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
check("void f(WIDGET *widget) {\n"
" if (dynamic_cast<BUTTON*>(widget)){}\n"
" else if (dynamic_cast<LABEL*>(widget)){}\n"
Removed "verify" code in testrunner. Fixing its messages reduces the accuracy of the test suite.
2015-07-25 14:17:55 +02:00
"}");
Moved several condition checks from checkOther to checkCondition (former checkAssignIf)
2014-08-29 17:06:46 +02:00
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
Fixed #6482 (False positive multiCondition)
2015-02-01 12:58:06 +01:00
check("void f(int x) {\n" // #6482
" if (x & 1) {}\n"
" else if (x == 0) {}\n"
Removed "verify" code in testrunner. Fixing its messages reduces the accuracy of the test suite.
2015-07-25 14:17:55 +02:00
"}");
Fixed #6482 (False positive multiCondition)
2015-02-01 12:58:06 +01:00
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
isOppositeCond: Fixed FN
2015-02-01 13:03:38 +01:00
check("void f(int x) {\n"
" if (x & 15) {}\n"
" else if (x == 40) {}\n"
Removed "verify" code in testrunner. Fixing its messages reduces the accuracy of the test suite.
2015-07-25 14:17:55 +02:00
"}");
isOppositeCond: Fixed FN
2015-02-01 13:03:38 +01:00
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:3]: (style) Expression is always false because 'else if' condition matches previous condition at line 2.\n", errout.str());
Moved several condition checks from checkOther to checkCondition (former checkAssignIf)
2014-08-29 17:06:46 +02:00
}
New check: Warn about constant expression if ( unknown | non_null_constant) (#6519)
2015-02-22 13:09:39 +01:00
void checkBadBitmaskCheck() {
check("bool f(int x) {\n"
" bool b = x | 0x02;\n"
" return b;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (warning) Result of operator '|' is always true if one operand is non-zero. Did you intend to use '&'?\n", errout.str());
check("bool f(int x) {\n"
" bool b = 0x02 | x;\n"
" return b;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (warning) Result of operator '|' is always true if one operand is non-zero. Did you intend to use '&'?\n", errout.str());
check("int f(int x) {\n"
" int b = x | 0x02;\n"
" return b;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
check("bool f(int x) {\n"
" bool b = x & 0x02;\n"
" return b;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
check("bool f(int x) {\n"
" if(x | 0x02)\n"
" return b;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (warning) Result of operator '|' is always true if one operand is non-zero. Did you intend to use '&'?\n", errout.str());
check("bool f(int x) {\n"
" int y = 0x1;\n"
" if(b) y = 0;\n"
" if(x | y)\n"
" return b;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
check("bool f(int x) {\n"
" foo(a && (x | 0x02));\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (warning) Result of operator '|' is always true if one operand is non-zero. Did you intend to use '&'?\n", errout.str());
check("int f(int x) {\n"
" return (x | 0x02) ? 0 : 5;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (warning) Result of operator '|' is always true if one operand is non-zero. Did you intend to use '&'?\n", errout.str());
check("int f(int x) {\n"
" return x ? (x | 0x02) : 5;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
check("bool f(int x) {\n"
" return x | 0x02;\n"
"}");
TODO_ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (warning) Result of operator '|' is always true if one operand is non-zero. Did you intend to use '&'?\n", "", errout.str());
check("int f(int x) {\n"
" return x | 0x02;\n"
"}");
Moved several condition checks from checkOther to checkCondition (former checkAssignIf)
2014-08-29 17:06:46 +02:00
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
#6543 crash: CheckCondition::checkBadBitmaskCheck ; wine dlls/gdi32/dibdrv/primitives.c. Run astyle.
2015-02-23 22:06:55 +01:00
check("void create_rop_masks_4( rop_mask_bits *bits) {\n"
"DWORD mask_offset;\n"
"BYTE *and_bits = bits->and;\n"
"rop_mask *rop_mask;\n"
"and_bits[mask_offset] |= (rop_mask->and & 0x0f);\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
Moved several condition checks from checkOther to checkCondition (former checkAssignIf)
2014-08-29 17:06:46 +02:00
}
astyle formatting
2014-11-20 14:20:09 +01:00
void incorrectLogicOperator1() {
Moved several condition checks from checkOther to checkCondition (former checkAssignIf)
2014-08-29 17:06:46 +02:00
check("void f(int x) {\n"
" if ((x != 1) || (x != 3))\n"
" a++;\n"
"}\n"
);
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (warning) Logical disjunction always evaluates to true: x != 1 || x != 3.\n", errout.str());
check("void f(int x) {\n"
" if (1 != x || 3 != x)\n"
" a++;\n"
"}\n"
);
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (warning) Logical disjunction always evaluates to true: x != 1 || x != 3.\n", errout.str());
Fixed #6852 (false negative: logical conjunction 'x == 0')
2015-07-21 22:26:22 +02:00
check("void f(int x) {\n"
" if (x<0 && !x) {}\n"
"}\n");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (warning) Logical conjunction always evaluates to false: x < 0 && !x.\n", errout.str());
check("void f(int x) {\n"
" if (x==0 && x) {}\n"
"}\n");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (warning) Logical conjunction always evaluates to false: x == 0 && x.\n", errout.str());
Moved several condition checks from checkOther to checkCondition (former checkAssignIf)
2014-08-29 17:06:46 +02:00
check("void f(int x) {\n" // ast..
" if (y == 1 && x == 1 && x == 7) { }\n"
"}\n");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (warning) Logical conjunction always evaluates to false: x == 1 && x == 7.\n", errout.str());
check("void f(int x, int y) {\n"
" if (x != 1 || y != 1)\n"
" a++;\n"
"}\n"
);
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
check("void f(int x, int y) {\n"
" if ((y == 1) && (x != 1) || (x != 3))\n"
" a++;\n"
"}\n"
);
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
check("void f(int x, int y) {\n"
" if ((x != 1) || (x != 3) && (y == 1))\n"
" a++;\n"
"}\n"
);
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
check("void f(int x) {\n"
" if ((x != 1) && (x != 3))\n"
" a++;\n"
"}\n"
);
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
check("void f(int x) {\n"
" if ((x == 1) || (x == 3))\n"
" a++;\n"
"}\n"
);
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
check("void f(int x, int y) {\n"
" if ((x != 1) || (y != 3))\n"
" a++;\n"
"}\n"
);
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
check("void f(int x, int y) {\n"
" if ((x != hotdog) || (y != hotdog))\n"
" a++;\n"
"}\n"
);
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
check("void f(int x, int y) {\n"
" if ((x != 5) || (y != 5))\n"
" a++;\n"
"}\n"
);
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
check("void f(int x) {\n"
" if ((x != 5) || (x != 6))\n"
" a++;\n"
"}\n"
);
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (warning) Logical disjunction always evaluates to true: x != 5 || x != 6.\n", errout.str());
check("void f(unsigned int a, unsigned int b, unsigned int c) {\n"
" if((a != b) || (c != b) || (c != a))\n"
" {\n"
" return true;\n"
" }\n"
" return false;\n"
"}\n"
);
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
}
astyle formatting
2014-11-20 14:20:09 +01:00
void incorrectLogicOperator2() {
Moved several condition checks from checkOther to checkCondition (former checkAssignIf)
2014-08-29 17:06:46 +02:00
check("void f(float x) {\n"
" if ((x == 1) && (x == 1.0))\n"
" a++;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
check("void f(int x) {\n"
" if ((x == 1) && (x == 0x00000001))\n"
" a++;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
check("void f(int x) {\n"
" if (x == 1 && x == 3)\n"
" a++;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (warning) Logical conjunction always evaluates to false: x == 1 && x == 3.\n", errout.str());
check("void f(int x) {\n"
" if (x == 1.0 && x == 3.0)\n"
" a++;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str()); // float comparisons with == and != are not checked right now - such comparison is a bad idea
check("void f(float x) {\n"
" if (x == 1 && x == 1.0)\n"
" a++;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
check("void bar(float f) {\n" // #5246
" if ((f > 0) && (f < 1)) {}\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
check("void f(int x) {\n"
" if (x < 1 && x > 1)\n"
" a++;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (warning) Logical conjunction always evaluates to false: x < 1 && x > 1.\n", errout.str());
check("void f(int x) {\n"
" if (x < 1.0 && x > 1.0)\n"
" a++;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (warning) Logical conjunction always evaluates to false: x < 1.0 && x > 1.0.\n", errout.str());
check("void f(int x) {\n"
" if (x < 1 && x > 1.0)\n"
" a++;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (warning) Logical conjunction always evaluates to false: x < 1 && x > 1.0.\n", errout.str());
check("void f(int x) {\n"
" if (x >= 1.0 && x <= 1.001)\n"
" a++;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
check("void f(int x) {\n"
" if (x < 1 && x > 3)\n"
" a++;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (warning) Logical conjunction always evaluates to false: x < 1 && x > 3.\n", errout.str());
check("void f(float x) {\n"
" if (x < 1.0 && x > 3.0)\n"
" a++;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (warning) Logical conjunction always evaluates to false: x < 1.0 && x > 3.0.\n", errout.str());
check("void f(int x) {\n"
" if (1 > x && 3 < x)\n"
" a++;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (warning) Logical conjunction always evaluates to false: x < 1 && x > 3.\n", errout.str());
check("void f(int x) {\n"
" if (x < 3 && x > 1)\n"
" a++;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
check("void f(int x) {\n"
" if (x > 3 || x < 10)\n"
" a++;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (warning) Logical disjunction always evaluates to true: x > 3 || x < 10.\n", errout.str());
check("void f(int x) {\n"
" if (x >= 3 || x <= 10)\n"
" a++;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (warning) Logical disjunction always evaluates to true: x >= 3 || x <= 10.\n", errout.str());
check("void f(int x) {\n"
" if (x >= 3 || x < 10)\n"
" a++;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (warning) Logical disjunction always evaluates to true: x >= 3 || x < 10.\n", errout.str());
check("void f(int x) {\n"
" if (x > 3 || x <= 10)\n"
" a++;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (warning) Logical disjunction always evaluates to true: x > 3 || x <= 10.\n", errout.str());
check("void f(int x) {\n"
" if (x > 3 || x < 3)\n"
" a++;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
check("void f(int x) {\n"
" if (x >= 3 || x <= 3)\n"
" a++;\n"
"}"
);
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (warning) Logical disjunction always evaluates to true: x >= 3 || x <= 3.\n", errout.str());
check("void f(int x) {\n"
" if (x >= 3 || x < 3)\n"
" a++;\n"
"}"
);
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (warning) Logical disjunction always evaluates to true: x >= 3 || x < 3.\n", errout.str());
check("void f(int x) {\n"
" if (x > 3 || x <= 3)\n"
" a++;\n"
"}"
);
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (warning) Logical disjunction always evaluates to true: x > 3 || x <= 3.\n", errout.str());
check("void f(int x) {\n"
" if((x==3) && (x!=4))\n"
" a++;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (style) Redundant condition: If x == 3, the comparison x != 4 is always true.\n", errout.str());
check("void f(int x) {\n"
" if ((x!=4) && (x==3))\n"
" a++;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (style) Redundant condition: If x == 3, the comparison x != 4 is always true.\n", errout.str());
check("void f(int x) {\n"
" if ((x==3) || (x!=4))\n"
" a++;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (style) Redundant condition: If x == 3, the comparison x != 4 is always true.\n", errout.str());
check("void f(int x) {\n"
" if ((x!=4) || (x==3))\n"
" a++;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (style) Redundant condition: If x == 3, the comparison x != 4 is always true.\n", errout.str());
check("void f(int x) {\n"
" if ((x==3) && (x!=3))\n"
" a++;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (warning) Logical conjunction always evaluates to false: x == 3 && x != 3.\n", errout.str());
check("void f(int x) {\n"
" if ((x==6) || (x!=6))\n"
" a++;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (warning) Logical disjunction always evaluates to true: x == 6 || x != 6.\n", errout.str());
check("void f(int x) {\n"
" if (x > 10 || x < 3)\n"
" a++;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
check("void f(int x) {\n"
" if (x > 5 && x == 1)\n"
" a++;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (warning) Logical conjunction always evaluates to false: x > 5 && x == 1.\n", errout.str());
check("void f(int x) {\n"
" if (x > 5 && x == 6)\n"
" a++;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (style) Redundant condition: If x == 6, the comparison x > 5 is always true.\n", errout.str());
// #3419
check("void f() {\n"
" if ( &q != &a && &q != &b ) { }\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
// #3676
check("void f(int m_x2, int w, int x) {\n"
" if (x + w - 1 > m_x2 || m_x2 < 0 )\n"
" m_x2 = x + w - 1;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
check("void f(float x) {\n" // x+1 => x
" if (x <= 1.0e20 && x >= -1.0e20) {}\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
check("void f(float x) {\n" // x+1 => x
" if (x >= 1.0e20 && x <= 1.0e21) {}\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
check("void f(float x) {\n" // x+1 => x
" if (x <= -1.0e20 && x >= -1.0e21) {}\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
}
astyle formatting
2014-11-20 14:20:09 +01:00
void incorrectLogicOperator3() {
Moved several condition checks from checkOther to checkCondition (former checkAssignIf)
2014-08-29 17:06:46 +02:00
check("void f(int x, bool& b) {\n"
" b = x > 5 && x == 1;\n"
" c = x < 1 && x == 3;\n"
" d = x >= 5 && x == 1;\n"
" e = x <= 1 && x == 3;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (warning) Logical conjunction always evaluates to false: x > 5 && x == 1.\n"
"[test.cpp:3]: (warning) Logical conjunction always evaluates to false: x < 1 && x == 3.\n"
"[test.cpp:4]: (warning) Logical conjunction always evaluates to false: x >= 5 && x == 1.\n"
"[test.cpp:5]: (warning) Logical conjunction always evaluates to false: x <= 1 && x == 3.\n", errout.str());
}
astyle formatting
2014-11-20 14:20:09 +01:00
void incorrectLogicOperator4() {
Moved several condition checks from checkOther to checkCondition (former checkAssignIf)
2014-08-29 17:06:46 +02:00
check("void f(int x) {\n"
" if (x && x != $0) {}\n"
Removed "verify" code in testrunner. Fixing its messages reduces the accuracy of the test suite.
2015-07-25 14:17:55 +02:00
"}");
Moved several condition checks from checkOther to checkCondition (former checkAssignIf)
2014-08-29 17:06:46 +02:00
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
}
astyle formatting
2014-11-20 14:20:09 +01:00
void incorrectLogicOperator5() { // complex expressions
Moved several condition checks from checkOther to checkCondition (former checkAssignIf)
2014-08-29 17:06:46 +02:00
check("void f(int x) {\n"
" if (x+3 > 2 || x+3 < 10) {}\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (warning) Logical disjunction always evaluates to true: EXPR > 2 || EXPR < 10.\n", errout.str());
}
astyle formatting
2014-11-20 14:20:09 +01:00
void incorrectLogicOperator6() { // char literals
Moved several condition checks from checkOther to checkCondition (former checkAssignIf)
2014-08-29 17:06:46 +02:00
check("void f(char x) {\n"
" if (x == '1' || x == '2') {}\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
check("void f(char x) {\n"
" if (x == '1' && x == '2') {}\n"
"}");
TODO_ASSERT_EQUALS("error", "", errout.str());
}
astyle formatting
2014-11-20 14:20:09 +01:00
void incorrectLogicOperator7() { // opposite expressions
Moved several condition checks from checkOther to checkCondition (former checkAssignIf)
2014-08-29 17:06:46 +02:00
check("void f(int i) {\n"
" if (i || !i) {}\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (warning) Logical disjunction always evaluates to true: i||!i.\n", errout.str());
Fixed #6764 (False positive redundantCondition - !(i>1) is not i<1)
2015-06-19 19:49:05 +02:00
check("void f(int a, int b) {\n"
" if (a>b || a<=b) {}\n"
"}");
TODO_ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (warning) Logical disjunction always evaluates to true: a>b||a<=b.\n", "", errout.str());
check("void f(int a, int b) {\n"
" if (a>b || a<b) {}\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
Moved several condition checks from checkOther to checkCondition (former checkAssignIf)
2014-08-29 17:06:46 +02:00
}
Fixed #6019 (false negative: Expression is always true/false '!(v!=10) && !(v!=20)')
2015-07-13 20:53:49 +02:00
void incorrectLogicOperator8() { // opposite expressions
check("void f(int i) {\n"
" if (!(i!=10) && !(i!=20)) {}\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (warning) Logical conjunction always evaluates to false: !(i != 10) && !(i != 20).\n", errout.str());
}
#6069 False positive incorrectLogicOperator due to dynamic_cast. Run CheckCondition::checkIncorrectLogicOperator on non-simplified tokenlist.
2015-07-30 10:30:30 +02:00
void incorrectLogicOperator9() { // #6069 "False positive incorrectLogicOperator due to dynamic_cast"
check("class MyType;\n"
Avoid 'Condition always true/false' FP when part of the condition is an expanded macro
2015-07-30 13:30:16 +02:00
"class OtherType;\n"
"void foo (OtherType* obj) { \n"
" assert((!obj) || dynamic_cast<MyType*>(obj));\n"
"}");
#6069 False positive incorrectLogicOperator due to dynamic_cast. Run CheckCondition::checkIncorrectLogicOperator on non-simplified tokenlist.
2015-07-30 10:30:30 +02:00
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
}
astyle formatting
2014-11-20 14:20:09 +01:00
void secondAlwaysTrueFalseWhenFirstTrueError() {
Moved several condition checks from checkOther to checkCondition (former checkAssignIf)
2014-08-29 17:06:46 +02:00
check("void f(int x) {\n"
" if (x > 5 && x != 1)\n"
" a++;\n"
"}\n"
);
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (style) Redundant condition: If x > 5, the comparison x != 1 is always true.\n", errout.str());
check("void f(int x) {\n"
" if (x > 5 && x != 6)\n"
" a++;\n"
"}\n"
);
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
check("void f(int x) {\n"
" if ((x > 5) && (x != 1))\n"
" a++;\n"
"}\n"
);
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (style) Redundant condition: If x > 5, the comparison x != 1 is always true.\n", errout.str());
check("void f(int x) {\n"
" if ((x > 5) && (x != 6))\n"
" a++;\n"
"}\n"
);
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
check("void f(int x, bool& b) {\n"
" b = x > 3 || x == 4;\n"
" c = x < 5 || x == 4;\n"
" d = x >= 3 || x == 4;\n"
" e = x <= 5 || x == 4;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (style) Redundant condition: If x == 4, the comparison x > 3 is always true.\n"
"[test.cpp:3]: (style) Redundant condition: If x == 4, the comparison x < 5 is always true.\n"
"[test.cpp:4]: (style) Redundant condition: If x == 4, the comparison x >= 3 is always true.\n"
"[test.cpp:5]: (style) Redundant condition: If x == 4, the comparison x <= 5 is always true.\n", errout.str());
check("void f(int x, bool& b) {\n"
" b = x > 5 || x != 1;\n"
" c = x < 1 || x != 3;\n"
" d = x >= 5 || x != 1;\n"
" e = x <= 1 || x != 3;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (style) Redundant condition: If x > 5, the comparison x != 1 is always true.\n"
"[test.cpp:3]: (style) Redundant condition: If x < 1, the comparison x != 3 is always true.\n"
"[test.cpp:4]: (style) Redundant condition: If x >= 5, the comparison x != 1 is always true.\n"
"[test.cpp:5]: (style) Redundant condition: If x <= 1, the comparison x != 3 is always true.\n", errout.str());
check("void f(int x, bool& b) {\n"
" b = x > 6 && x > 5;\n"
" c = x > 5 || x > 6;\n"
" d = x < 6 && x < 5;\n"
" e = x < 5 || x < 6;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (style) Redundant condition: If x > 6, the comparison x > 5 is always true.\n"
"[test.cpp:3]: (style) Redundant condition: If x > 6, the comparison x > 5 is always true.\n"
"[test.cpp:4]: (style) Redundant condition: If x < 5, the comparison x < 6 is always true.\n"
"[test.cpp:5]: (style) Redundant condition: If x < 5, the comparison x < 6 is always true.\n", errout.str());
}
astyle formatting
2014-11-20 14:20:09 +01:00
void incorrectLogicOp_condSwapping() {
Moved several condition checks from checkOther to checkCondition (former checkAssignIf)
2014-08-29 17:06:46 +02:00
check("void f(int x) {\n"
" if (x < 1 && x > 3)\n"
" a++;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (warning) Logical conjunction always evaluates to false: x < 1 && x > 3.\n", errout.str());
check("void f(int x) {\n"
" if (1 > x && x > 3)\n"
" a++;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (warning) Logical conjunction always evaluates to false: x < 1 && x > 3.\n", errout.str());
check("void f(int x) {\n"
" if (x < 1 && 3 < x)\n"
" a++;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (warning) Logical conjunction always evaluates to false: x < 1 && x > 3.\n", errout.str());
check("void f(int x) {\n"
" if (1 > x && 3 < x)\n"
" a++;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (warning) Logical conjunction always evaluates to false: x < 1 && x > 3.\n", errout.str());
check("void f(int x) {\n"
" if (x > 3 && x < 1)\n"
" a++;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (warning) Logical conjunction always evaluates to false: x > 3 && x < 1.\n", errout.str());
check("void f(int x) {\n"
" if (3 < x && x < 1)\n"
" a++;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (warning) Logical conjunction always evaluates to false: x > 3 && x < 1.\n", errout.str());
check("void f(int x) {\n"
" if (x > 3 && 1 > x)\n"
" a++;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (warning) Logical conjunction always evaluates to false: x > 3 && x < 1.\n", errout.str());
check("void f(int x) {\n"
" if (3 < x && 1 > x)\n"
" a++;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (warning) Logical conjunction always evaluates to false: x > 3 && x < 1.\n", errout.str());
}
astyle formatting
2014-11-20 14:20:09 +01:00
void modulo() {
Moved several condition checks from checkOther to checkCondition (former checkAssignIf)
2014-08-29 17:06:46 +02:00
check("bool f(bool& b1, bool& b2, bool& b3) {\n"
" b1 = a % 5 == 4;\n"
" b2 = a % c == 100000;\n"
" b3 = a % 5 == c;\n"
" return a % 5 == 5-p;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
check("bool f(bool& b1, bool& b2, bool& b3, bool& b4, bool& b5) {\n"
" b1 = a % 5 < 5;\n"
" b2 = a % 5 <= 5;\n"
" b3 = a % 5 == 5;\n"
" b4 = a % 5 != 5;\n"
" b5 = a % 5 >= 5;\n"
" return a % 5 > 5;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (warning) Comparison of modulo result is predetermined, because it is always less than 5.\n"
"[test.cpp:3]: (warning) Comparison of modulo result is predetermined, because it is always less than 5.\n"
"[test.cpp:4]: (warning) Comparison of modulo result is predetermined, because it is always less than 5.\n"
"[test.cpp:5]: (warning) Comparison of modulo result is predetermined, because it is always less than 5.\n"
"[test.cpp:6]: (warning) Comparison of modulo result is predetermined, because it is always less than 5.\n"
"[test.cpp:7]: (warning) Comparison of modulo result is predetermined, because it is always less than 5.\n", errout.str());
check("void f(bool& b1, bool& b2) {\n"
" b1 = bar() % 5 < 889;\n"
" if(x[593] % 5 <= 5)\n"
" b2 = x.a % 5 == 5;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (warning) Comparison of modulo result is predetermined, because it is always less than 5.\n"
"[test.cpp:3]: (warning) Comparison of modulo result is predetermined, because it is always less than 5.\n"
"[test.cpp:4]: (warning) Comparison of modulo result is predetermined, because it is always less than 5.\n", errout.str());
check("void f() {\n"
" if (a % 2 + b % 2 == 2)\n"
" foo();\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
}
astyle formatting
2014-11-20 14:20:09 +01:00
void oppositeInnerCondition() {
Moved several condition checks from checkOther to checkCondition (former checkAssignIf)
2014-08-29 17:06:46 +02:00
check("void foo(int a, int b) {\n"
" if(a==b)\n"
" if(a!=b)\n"
" cout << a;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2] -> [test.cpp:3]: (warning) Opposite conditions in nested 'if' blocks lead to a dead code block.\n", errout.str());
check("void foo(int a, int b) {\n"
" if(a==b)\n"
" if(b!=a)\n"
" cout << a;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2] -> [test.cpp:3]: (warning) Opposite conditions in nested 'if' blocks lead to a dead code block.\n", errout.str());
check("void foo(int a) {\n"
" if(a >= 50) {\n"
" if(a < 50)\n"
" cout << a;\n"
" else\n"
" cout << 100;\n"
" }\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2] -> [test.cpp:3]: (warning) Opposite conditions in nested 'if' blocks lead to a dead code block.\n", errout.str());
// #4186
check("void foo(int a) {\n"
" if(a >= 50) {\n"
" if(a > 50)\n"
" cout << a;\n"
" else\n"
" cout << 100;\n"
" }\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
// 4170
check("class foo {\n"
" void bar() {\n"
" if (tok == '(') {\n"
" next();\n"
" if (tok == ',') {\n"
" next();\n"
" if (tok != ',') {\n"
" op->reg2 = asm_parse_reg();\n"
" }\n"
" skip(',');\n"
" }\n"
" }\n"
" }\n"
" void next();\n"
" const char *tok;\n"
"};");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
check("void foo(int i)\n"
"{\n"
" if(i > 5) {\n"
" i = bar();\n"
" if(i < 5) {\n"
" cout << a;\n"
" }\n"
" }\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
check("void foo(int& i) {\n"
" i=6;\n"
"}\n"
"void bar(int i) {\n"
" if(i>5) {\n"
" foo(i);\n"
" if(i<5) {\n"
" }\n"
" }\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
check("void foo(int& i);\n"
"void bar() {\n"
" int i; i = func();\n"
" if(i>5) {\n"
" foo(i);\n"
" if(i<5) {\n"
" }\n"
" }\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
check("void foo(int i);\n"
"void bar(int i) {\n"
" if(i>5) {\n"
" foo(i);\n"
" if(i<5) {\n"
" }\n"
" }\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:3] -> [test.cpp:5]: (warning) Opposite conditions in nested 'if' blocks lead to a dead code block.\n", errout.str());
check("void foo(int i);\n"
"void bar() {\n"
" int i; i = func();\n"
" if(i>5) {\n"
" foo(i);\n"
" if(i<5) {\n"
" }\n"
" }\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:4] -> [test.cpp:6]: (warning) Opposite conditions in nested 'if' blocks lead to a dead code block.\n", errout.str());
// see linux revision 1f80c0cc
check("int generic_write_sync(int,int,int);\n"
"\n"
"void cifs_writev(int i) {\n"
" int rc = __generic_file_aio_write();\n"
" if (rc > 0){\n"
" err = generic_write_sync(file, iocb->ki_pos - rc, rc);\n"
" if(rc < 0) {\n" // <- condition is always false
" err = rc;\n"
" }\n"
" }\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:5] -> [test.cpp:7]: (warning) Opposite conditions in nested 'if' blocks lead to a dead code block.\n", errout.str());
check("void f(struct ABC *abc) {\n"
" struct AB *ab = abc->ab;\n"
" if (ab->a == 123){\n"
" do_something(abc);\n" // might change ab->a
" if (ab->a != 123) {\n"
" err = rc;\n"
" }\n"
" }\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
Fixed #6095 (False positive oppositeInnerCondition - neglecting statements with side-effects)
2014-12-31 15:14:22 +01:00
{
// #6095 - calling member function that might change the state
check("void f() {\n"
" const Fred fred;\n" // <- fred is const, warn
" if (fred.isValid()) {\n"
" fred.dostuff();\n"
" if (!fred.isValid()) {}\n"
" }\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:3] -> [test.cpp:5]: (warning) Opposite conditions in nested 'if' blocks lead to a dead code block.\n", errout.str());
check("class Fred { public: void dostuff() const; };\n"
"void f() {\n"
" Fred fred;\n"
" if (fred.isValid()) {\n"
" fred.dostuff();\n" // <- dostuff() is const, warn
" if (!fred.isValid()) {}\n"
" }\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:4] -> [test.cpp:6]: (warning) Opposite conditions in nested 'if' blocks lead to a dead code block.\n", errout.str());
check("void f() {\n"
" Fred fred;\n"
" if (fred.isValid()) {\n"
" fred.dostuff();\n"
" if (!fred.isValid()) {}\n"
" }\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
#6385 crash in Variable::getFlag(). Catch token without variable in fix for #6095.
2014-12-31 18:19:10 +01:00
// #6385 "crash in Variable::getFlag()"
check("class TranslationHandler {\n"
"QTranslator *mTranslator;\n"
"void SetLanguage() {\n"
" if (mTranslator) {\n"
" qApp->removeTranslator(mTranslator);\n"
" }\n"
" }\n"
"};");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str()); // just don't crash...
Fixed #6095 (False positive oppositeInnerCondition - neglecting statements with side-effects)
2014-12-31 15:14:22 +01:00
}
Moved several condition checks from checkOther to checkCondition (former checkAssignIf)
2014-08-29 17:06:46 +02:00
// #5731 - fp when undeclared variable is used
check("void f() {\n"
" if (x == -1){\n"
" x = do_something();\n"
" if (x != -1) {}\n"
" }\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
// #5750 - another fp when undeclared variable is used
check("void f() {\n"
" if (r < w){\n"
" r += 3;\n"
" if (r > w) {}\n"
Fixed #6574 (False positive oppositeInnerCondition - unknown variable)
2015-06-14 20:06:05 +02:00
" }\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
// #6574 - another fp when undeclared variable is used
check("void foo() {\n"
" if(i) {\n"
" i++;\n"
" if(!i) {}\n"
Moved several condition checks from checkOther to checkCondition (former checkAssignIf)
2014-08-29 17:06:46 +02:00
" }\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
#6313: Added test case for oppositeInnerCondition.
2015-07-16 08:44:38 +02:00
// #6313 - false postive: opposite conditions in nested if blocks when condition changed
check("void Foo::Bar() {\n"
" if(var){\n"
" --var;\n"
" if(!var){}\n"
" else {}\n"
" }\n"
"}\n");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
Moved several condition checks from checkOther to checkCondition (former checkAssignIf)
2014-08-29 17:06:46 +02:00
// #5874 - array
check("void testOppositeConditions2() {\n"
" int array[2] = { 0, 0 };\n"
" if (array[0] < 2) {\n"
" array[0] += 5;\n"
" if (array[0] > 2) {}\n"
" }\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
Fixed #6227 (False positive (oppositeInnerCondition) - if (!dynamic_cast<>))
2015-07-27 10:43:52 +02:00
// #6227 - FP caused by simplifications of casts and known variables
check("void foo(A *a) {\n"
" if(a) {\n"
" B *b = dynamic_cast<B*>(a);\n"
" if(!b) {}\n"
" }\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
check("void foo(int a) {\n"
" if(a) {\n"
" int b = a;\n"
" if(!b) {}\n"
" }\n"
"}");
TODO_ASSERT_EQUALS("error", "", errout.str());
Moved several condition checks from checkOther to checkCondition (former checkAssignIf)
2014-08-29 17:06:46 +02:00
}
#6313: Added test case for oppositeInnerCondition.
2015-07-16 08:44:38 +02:00
// clarify conditions with = and comparison
astyle formatting
2014-11-20 14:20:09 +01:00
void clarifyCondition1() {
Moved several condition checks from checkOther to checkCondition (former checkAssignIf)
2014-08-29 17:06:46 +02:00
check("void f() {\n"
" if (x = b() < 0) {}\n" // don't simplify and verify this code
Removed "verify" code in testrunner. Fixing its messages reduces the accuracy of the test suite.
2015-07-25 14:17:55 +02:00
"}");
Moved several condition checks from checkOther to checkCondition (former checkAssignIf)
2014-08-29 17:06:46 +02:00
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (style) Suspicious condition (assignment + comparison); Clarify expression with parentheses.\n", errout.str());
check("void f(int i) {\n"
" for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {}\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
check("void f() {\n"
" x = a<int>(); if (x) {}\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
Fixed #6249 (False positive: Incorrect detection of (assignment + comparison) inside for-clause)
2015-02-05 20:17:30 +01:00
check("void f() {\n"
" if (x = b < 0 ? 1 : 2) {}\n" // don't simplify and verify this code
Removed "verify" code in testrunner. Fixing its messages reduces the accuracy of the test suite.
2015-07-25 14:17:55 +02:00
"}");
Fixed #6249 (False positive: Incorrect detection of (assignment + comparison) inside for-clause)
2015-02-05 20:17:30 +01:00
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
New warning: warn about redundant code in condition.
2015-06-10 18:53:55 +02:00
check("void f() {\n"
" int y = rand(), z = rand();\n"
" if (y || (!y && z));\n"
Removed "verify" code in testrunner. Fixing its messages reduces the accuracy of the test suite.
2015-07-25 14:17:55 +02:00
"}");
New warning: warn about redundant code in condition.
2015-06-10 18:53:55 +02:00
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:3]: (style) Redundant condition: !y. 'A && (!A || B)' is equivalent to 'A || B'\n", errout.str());
check("void f() {\n"
" int y = rand(), z = rand();\n"
" if (y || !y && z);\n"
Removed "verify" code in testrunner. Fixing its messages reduces the accuracy of the test suite.
2015-07-25 14:17:55 +02:00
"}");
New warning: warn about redundant code in condition.
2015-06-10 18:53:55 +02:00
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:3]: (style) Redundant condition: !y. 'A && (!A || B)' is equivalent to 'A || B'\n", errout.str());
check("void f() {\n"
" if (!a || a && b) {}\n"
Removed "verify" code in testrunner. Fixing its messages reduces the accuracy of the test suite.
2015-07-25 14:17:55 +02:00
"}");
New warning: warn about redundant code in condition.
2015-06-10 18:53:55 +02:00
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (style) Redundant condition: a. 'A && (!A || B)' is equivalent to 'A || B'\n", errout.str());
check("void f() {\n"
" if (!tok->next()->function() || \n"
" (tok->next()->function() && tok->next()->function()->isConstructor()));\n"
Removed "verify" code in testrunner. Fixing its messages reduces the accuracy of the test suite.
2015-07-25 14:17:55 +02:00
"}");
New warning: warn about redundant code in condition.
2015-06-10 18:53:55 +02:00
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (style) Redundant condition: tok.next().function(). 'A && (!A || B)' is equivalent to 'A || B'\n", errout.str());
check("void f() {\n"
" if (!tok->next()->function() || \n"
" (!tok->next()->function() && tok->next()->function()->isConstructor()));\n"
Removed "verify" code in testrunner. Fixing its messages reduces the accuracy of the test suite.
2015-07-25 14:17:55 +02:00
"}");
New warning: warn about redundant code in condition.
2015-06-10 18:53:55 +02:00
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
check("void f() {\n"
" if (!tok->next()->function() || \n"
" (!tok2->next()->function() && tok->next()->function()->isConstructor()));\n"
Removed "verify" code in testrunner. Fixing its messages reduces the accuracy of the test suite.
2015-07-25 14:17:55 +02:00
"}");
New warning: warn about redundant code in condition.
2015-06-10 18:53:55 +02:00
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
check("void f() {\n"
" if (!tok->next(1)->function(1) || \n"
" (tok->next(1)->function(1) && tok->next(1)->function(1)->isConstructor()));\n"
Removed "verify" code in testrunner. Fixing its messages reduces the accuracy of the test suite.
2015-07-25 14:17:55 +02:00
"}");
New warning: warn about redundant code in condition.
2015-06-10 18:53:55 +02:00
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (style) Redundant condition: tok.next(1).function(1). 'A && (!A || B)' is equivalent to 'A || B'\n", errout.str());
check("void f() {\n"
" if (!tok->next()->function(1) || \n"
" (tok->next()->function(2) && tok->next()->function()->isConstructor()));\n"
Removed "verify" code in testrunner. Fixing its messages reduces the accuracy of the test suite.
2015-07-25 14:17:55 +02:00
"}");
New warning: warn about redundant code in condition.
2015-06-10 18:53:55 +02:00
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
check("void f() {\n"
" int y = rand(), z = rand();\n"
" if (y==0 || y!=0 && z);\n"
Removed "verify" code in testrunner. Fixing its messages reduces the accuracy of the test suite.
2015-07-25 14:17:55 +02:00
"}");
Tokenizer: Removed Tokenizer::simplifyIfNotNull (#6072)
2015-07-21 17:58:44 +02:00
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:3]: (style) Redundant condition: y!=0. 'A && (!A || B)' is equivalent to 'A || B'\n", errout.str());
Fixed #6764 (False positive redundantCondition - !(i>1) is not i<1)
2015-06-19 19:49:05 +02:00
check("void f() {\n"
" if (x>0 || (x<0 && y)) {}\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
Moved several condition checks from checkOther to checkCondition (former checkAssignIf)
2014-08-29 17:06:46 +02:00
}
#6543 crash: CheckCondition::checkBadBitmaskCheck ; wine dlls/gdi32/dibdrv/primitives.c. Run astyle.
2015-02-23 22:06:55 +01:00
// clarify conditions with bitwise operator and comparison
astyle formatting
2014-11-20 14:20:09 +01:00
void clarifyCondition2() {
Moved several condition checks from checkOther to checkCondition (former checkAssignIf)
2014-08-29 17:06:46 +02:00
check("void f() {\n"
" if (x & 3 == 2) {}\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (style) Suspicious condition (bitwise operator + comparison); Clarify expression with parentheses.\n", errout.str());
check("void f() {\n"
" if (a & fred1.x == fred2.y) {}\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (style) Suspicious condition (bitwise operator + comparison); Clarify expression with parentheses.\n", errout.str());
}
#6543 crash: CheckCondition::checkBadBitmaskCheck ; wine dlls/gdi32/dibdrv/primitives.c. Run astyle.
2015-02-23 22:06:55 +01:00
// clarify condition that uses ! operator and then bitwise operator
astyle formatting
2014-11-20 14:20:09 +01:00
void clarifyCondition3() {
Moved several condition checks from checkOther to checkCondition (former checkAssignIf)
2014-08-29 17:06:46 +02:00
check("void f(int w) {\n"
" if(!w & 0x8000) {}\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (style) Boolean result is used in bitwise operation. Clarify expression with parentheses.\n", errout.str());
check("void f() {\n"
" if (x == foo() & 2) {}\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (style) Boolean result is used in bitwise operation. Clarify expression with parentheses.\n", errout.str());
check("void f(std::list<int> &ints) { }");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
check("void f() { A<x &> a; }");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
Removed "verify" code in testrunner. Fixing its messages reduces the accuracy of the test suite.
2015-07-25 14:17:55 +02:00
check("void f() { a(x<y|z,0); }", "test.c"); // filename is c => there are never templates
Moved several condition checks from checkOther to checkCondition (former checkAssignIf)
2014-08-29 17:06:46 +02:00
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.c:1]: (style) Boolean result is used in bitwise operation. Clarify expression with parentheses.\n", errout.str());
Removed "verify" code in testrunner. Fixing its messages reduces the accuracy of the test suite.
2015-07-25 14:17:55 +02:00
check("class A<B&,C>;", "test.cpp");
Moved several condition checks from checkOther to checkCondition (former checkAssignIf)
2014-08-29 17:06:46 +02:00
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
check("void f() {\n"
" if (result != (char *)&inline_result) { }\n" // don't simplify and verify cast
Removed "verify" code in testrunner. Fixing its messages reduces the accuracy of the test suite.
2015-07-25 14:17:55 +02:00
"}");
Moved several condition checks from checkOther to checkCondition (former checkAssignIf)
2014-08-29 17:06:46 +02:00
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
}
astyle formatting
2014-11-20 14:20:09 +01:00
void clarifyCondition4() { // ticket #3110
Moved several condition checks from checkOther to checkCondition (former checkAssignIf)
2014-08-29 17:06:46 +02:00
check("typedef double SomeType;\n"
"typedef std::pair<std::string,SomeType> PairType;\n"
"struct S\n"
"{\n"
" bool operator()\n"
" ( PairType const & left\n"
" , PairType const & right) const\n"
" {\n"
" return left.first < right.first;\n"
" }\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
}
astyle formatting
2014-11-20 14:20:09 +01:00
void clarifyCondition5() { // ticket #3609 (using | in template instantiation)
Moved several condition checks from checkOther to checkCondition (former checkAssignIf)
2014-08-29 17:06:46 +02:00
check("CWinTraits<WS_CHILD|WS_VISIBLE>::GetWndStyle(0);");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
}
astyle formatting
2014-11-20 14:20:09 +01:00
void clarifyCondition6() {
Moved several condition checks from checkOther to checkCondition (former checkAssignIf)
2014-08-29 17:06:46 +02:00
check("template<class Y>\n"
"SharedPtr& operator=( SharedPtr<Y> const & r ) {\n"
" px = r.px;\n"
" return *this;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
}
Refactoring to address some issues from #5895 (handling of unsigned numbers). Also adding a TODO testcase since the real issue (FP) is still not fixed
2015-06-13 18:08:13 +02:00
void testBug5895() {
check("void png_parse(uint64_t init, int buf_size) {\n"
" if (init == 0x89504e470d0a1a0a || init == 0x8a4d4e470d0a1a0a)\n"
" ;\n"
"}");
Adjust two checks which have different results on Windows/Visual Studio than on Linux: one succeeds already, another fails. Analysis/fix is under development. Temporary repair allows to detect further regressions.
2015-06-30 21:21:26 +02:00
#ifdef _MSC_VER
Remove some code checking for invalid class hierarchy which got obsolete since 480a5672b046ef0017af8bf59b6284895c22123d. Run astyle
2015-07-01 07:50:13 +02:00
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
Adjust two checks which have different results on Windows/Visual Studio than on Linux: one succeeds already, another fails. Analysis/fix is under development. Temporary repair allows to detect further regressions.
2015-06-30 21:21:26 +02:00
#else
Refactoring to address some issues from #5895 (handling of unsigned numbers). Also adding a TODO testcase since the real issue (FP) is still not fixed
2015-06-13 18:08:13 +02:00
TODO_ASSERT_EQUALS("", "[test.cpp:2]: (style) Redundant condition: If init == 9894494448401390090, the comparison init == 9965707617509186058 is always true.\n", errout.str());
Adjust two checks which have different results on Windows/Visual Studio than on Linux: one succeeds already, another fails. Analysis/fix is under development. Temporary repair allows to detect further regressions.
2015-06-30 21:21:26 +02:00
#endif
Refactoring to address some issues from #5895 (handling of unsigned numbers). Also adding a TODO testcase since the real issue (FP) is still not fixed
2015-06-13 18:08:13 +02:00
}
#5309 False positive: redundantCondition - comparing large integer values (unsigned long long). Testcase added, issue got fixed before.
2015-06-20 12:18:24 +02:00
void testBug5309() {
check("extern uint64_t value;\n"
"void foo() {\n"
" if( ( value >= 0x7ff0000000000001ULL )\n"
" && ( value <= 0x7fffffffffffffffULL ) );\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
}
Fixed #4842 (condition is always true (variable is assigned constant value and then used in condition))
2015-07-17 15:30:23 +02:00
void alwaysTrue() {
check("void f() {\n" // #4842
" int x = 0;\n"
" if (a) { return; }\n" // <- this is just here to fool simplifyKnownVariabels
" if (!x) {}\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:4]: (style) Condition !x is always true\n", errout.str());
alwaysTrueFalse: Dont write warning when comparison is made in macro
2015-07-29 12:51:00 +02:00
// Avoid FP when condition comes from macro
check("void f() {\n"
" int x = 0;\n"
" if (a) { return; }\n" // <- this is just here to fool simplifyKnownVariabels
" if ($!x) {}\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
Avoid 'Condition always true/false' FP when part of the condition is an expanded macro
2015-07-30 13:30:16 +02:00
check("void f() {\n"
" int x = 0;\n"
" if (a) { return; }\n" // <- this is just here to fool simplifyKnownVariabels
" if ($x != $0) {}\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
Fixed #4842 (condition is always true (variable is assigned constant value and then used in condition))
2015-07-17 15:30:23 +02:00
}
Moved several condition checks from checkOther to checkCondition (former checkAssignIf)
2014-08-29 17:06:46 +02:00
};
REGISTER_TEST(TestCondition)