manual.docbook: no changes. just reformatting.

This commit is contained in:
Daniel Marjamäki 2016-07-29 23:06:43 +02:00
parent 66d0d7a0ad
commit 45a3bf6f6f
1 changed files with 77 additions and 71 deletions

View File

@ -314,8 +314,8 @@ cppcheck --enable=all</programlisting>
<para>You can use -D to change this. When you use -D, cppcheck will by
default only check the given configuration and nothing else. This is how
compilers work. But you can use <literal>--force</literal> or
<literal>--max-configs</literal> to override the number
of configurations.</para>
<literal>--max-configs</literal> to override the number of
configurations.</para>
<programlisting># check all configurations
cppcheck file.c
@ -670,16 +670,16 @@ Checking test.c...
<chapter>
<title>Library configuration</title>
<para>When external libraries are used, such as WinAPI, POSIX, gtk, Qt, etc,
<literal>Cppcheck</literal> doesn't know how the external functions
<para>When external libraries are used, such as WinAPI, POSIX, gtk, Qt,
etc, <literal>Cppcheck</literal> doesn't know how the external functions
behave. <literal>Cppcheck</literal> then fails to detect various problems
such as leaks, buffer overflows, possible null pointer dereferences, etc.
But this can be fixed with configuration files.</para>
<para>Cppcheck already contains configurations for several libraries. They
can be loaded as described below. Note that the configuration for the standard
libraries of C and C++, <literal>std.cfg</literal>, is always loaded by
cppcheck. If you create or update a configuration file for a
can be loaded as described below. Note that the configuration for the
standard libraries of C and C++, <literal>std.cfg</literal>, is always
loaded by cppcheck. If you create or update a configuration file for a
popular library, we would appreciate if you upload it to us.</para>
<section>
@ -704,23 +704,25 @@ Checking test.c...
<title>Memory/resource leaks</title>
<para>Cppcheck has configurable checking for leaks, e.g. you can specify
which functions allocate and free memory or resources and which functions
do not affect the allocation at all.</para>
which functions allocate and free memory or resources and which
functions do not affect the allocation at all.</para>
<section>
<title>alloc and dealloc</title>
<para>Here is an example program:</para>
<para><programlisting>void test()
<para>
<programlisting>void test()
{
HPEN pen = CreatePen(PS_SOLID, 1, RGB(255,0,0));
}</programlisting></para>
}</programlisting>
</para>
<para>The code example above has a resource leak -
<literal>CreatePen()</literal> is a WinAPI function that creates a
pen. However, Cppcheck doesn't assume that return values from functions
must be freed. There is no error message:</para>
pen. However, Cppcheck doesn't assume that return values from
functions must be freed. There is no error message:</para>
<programlisting># cppcheck pen1.c
Checking pen1.c...</programlisting>
@ -745,9 +747,9 @@ Checking pen1.c...
<para>The allocation and deallocation functions are organized in groups.
Each group is defined in a <literal>&lt;resource&gt;</literal> or
<literal>&lt;memory&gt;</literal> tag and is identified by its <literal>&lt;dealloc&gt;</literal>
functions. This means, groups with overlapping <literal>&lt;dealloc&gt;</literal>
tags are merged.</para>
<literal>&lt;memory&gt;</literal> tag and is identified by its
<literal>&lt;dealloc&gt;</literal> functions. This means, groups with
overlapping <literal>&lt;dealloc&gt;</literal> tags are merged.</para>
<section>
<title>leak-ignore and use</title>
@ -788,10 +790,9 @@ Checking pen1.c...
&lt;/memory&gt;
&lt;/def&gt;</programlisting>
<para>The <literal>&lt;use&gt;</literal>
configuration has no logical purpose. You will get the same warnings
without it. Use it to silence <literal>--check-library</literal>
information messages.</para>
<para>The <literal>&lt;use&gt;</literal> configuration has no logical
purpose. You will get the same warnings without it. Use it to silence
<literal>--check-library</literal> information messages.</para>
</section>
</section>
@ -799,23 +800,25 @@ Checking pen1.c...
<title>Function behaviour</title>
<para>To specify the behaviour of functions and how they should be used,
<literal>&lt;function&gt;</literal> tags can be used. Functions are identified
by their name, specified in the <literal>name</literal> attribute and their
number of arguments. The name is a comma-separated list of function names.
For functions in namespaces or classes, just provide their fully qualified
name. For example: <literal>&lt;function name="memcpy,std::memcpy"&gt;</literal>.
</para>
<literal>&lt;function&gt;</literal> tags can be used. Functions are
identified by their name, specified in the <literal>name</literal>
attribute and their number of arguments. The name is a comma-separated
list of function names. For functions in namespaces or classes, just
provide their fully qualified name. For example: <literal>&lt;function
name="memcpy,std::memcpy"&gt;</literal>.</para>
<section>
<title>Function arguments</title>
<para>The arguments a function takes can be specified by <literal>&lt;arg&gt;</literal>
tags. Each of them takes the number of the argument (starting from 1) in the
<literal>nr</literal> attribute, or <literal>nr="any"</literal> for variadic arguments.
Optional arguments can be specified by providing a default value:
<literal>default="value"</literal>. Specifying <literal>-1</literal> as the argument
number is going to apply a check to all arguments of that function. The specifications
for individual arguments override this setting.</para>
<para>The arguments a function takes can be specified by
<literal>&lt;arg&gt;</literal> tags. Each of them takes the number of
the argument (starting from 1) in the <literal>nr</literal> attribute,
or <literal>nr="any"</literal> for variadic arguments. Optional
arguments can be specified by providing a default value:
<literal>default="value"</literal>. Specifying <literal>-1</literal>
as the argument number is going to apply a check to all arguments of
that function. The specifications for individual arguments override
this setting.</para>
<section>
<title>Uninitialized memory</title>
@ -829,16 +832,16 @@ Checking pen1.c...
CopyMemory(buffer1, buffer2, 1024);
}</programlisting>
<para>The bug here is that buffer2 is uninitialized. The second argument
for CopyMemory needs to be initialized. However,
<para>The bug here is that buffer2 is uninitialized. The second
argument for CopyMemory needs to be initialized. However,
<literal>Cppcheck</literal> assumes that it is fine to pass
uninitialized variables to functions:</para>
<programlisting># cppcheck uninit.c
Checking uninit.c...</programlisting>
<para>If you provide a configuration file then Cppcheck detects
the bug:</para>
<para>If you provide a configuration file then Cppcheck detects the
bug:</para>
<programlisting># cppcheck --library=windows.cfg uninit.c
Checking uninit.c...
@ -864,8 +867,8 @@ Checking uninit.c...
<section>
<title>Null pointers</title>
<para>Cppcheck assumes it's ok to pass NULL pointers to functions. Here
is an example program:</para>
<para>Cppcheck assumes it's ok to pass NULL pointers to functions.
Here is an example program:</para>
<programlisting>void test()
{
@ -886,9 +889,9 @@ Checking null.c...</programlisting>
Checking null.c...
[null.c:3]: (error) Null pointer dereference</programlisting>
<para>Note that this implies <literal>&lt;not-uninit&gt;</literal> as
far as values are concerned. Uninitialized memory might still be passed
do the function.</para>
<para>Note that this implies <literal>&lt;not-uninit&gt;</literal>
as far as values are concerned. Uninitialized memory might still be
passed do the function.</para>
<para>Here is a minimal <literal>windows.cfg</literal> file:</para>
@ -920,8 +923,8 @@ Checking null.c...
<programlisting># cppcheck formatstring.c
Checking formatstring.c...</programlisting>
<para>A configuration file can be created that says that the string is a
format string. For instance:</para>
<para>A configuration file can be created that says that the string
is a format string. For instance:</para>
<para><programlisting>&lt;?xml version="1.0"?&gt;
&lt;def&gt;
@ -965,8 +968,8 @@ Checking formatstring.c...
<programlisting># cppcheck valuerange.c
Checking valuerange.c...</programlisting>
<para>A configuration file can be created that says that 1024 is out of
bounds. For instance:</para>
<para>A configuration file can be created that says that 1024 is out
of bounds. For instance:</para>
<para><programlisting>&lt;?xml version="1.0"?&gt;
&lt;def&gt;
@ -981,7 +984,8 @@ Checking valuerange.c...</programlisting>
Checking range.c...
[range.c:3]: (error) Invalid do_something() argument nr 1. The value is 1024 but the valid values are '0-1023'.</programlisting>
<para>Some example expressions you can use in the valid element:</para>
<para>Some example expressions you can use in the valid
element:</para>
<programlisting>0,3,5 =&gt; only values 0, 3 and 5 are valid
-10:20 =&gt; all values between -10 and 20 are valid
@ -1008,9 +1012,9 @@ Checking range.c...
<programlisting># cppcheck minsize.c
Checking minsize.c...</programlisting>
<para>A configuration file can for instance be created that says that
the size of the buffer in argument 1 must be larger than the strlen of
argument 2.For instance:</para>
<para>A configuration file can for instance be created that says
that the size of the buffer in argument 1 must be larger than the
strlen of argument 2.For instance:</para>
<para><programlisting>&lt;?xml version="1.0"?&gt;
&lt;def&gt;
@ -1052,8 +1056,8 @@ Checking minsize.c...
<term>sizeof</term>
<listitem>
<para>buffer size must be larger than other argument buffer size.
Example: see strncpy configuration in std.cfg</para>
<para>buffer size must be larger than other argument buffer
size. Example: see strncpy configuration in std.cfg</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
@ -1061,16 +1065,17 @@ Checking minsize.c...
<term>mul</term>
<listitem>
<para>buffer size must be larger than multiplication result when
multiplying values given in two other arguments. Typically one
argument defines the element size and another element defines the
number of elements. Example: see fread configuration in
std.cfg</para>
<para>buffer size must be larger than multiplication result
when multiplying values given in two other arguments.
Typically one argument defines the element size and another
element defines the number of elements. Example: see fread
configuration in std.cfg</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
</variablelist>
</section>
</section>
<section>
<title>noreturn</title>
@ -1087,8 +1092,9 @@ Checking minsize.c...
buffer[0] = data; // &lt;- error: data is uninitialized if x is not 1
}</programlisting>
<para>In theory, if <literal>ZeroMemory</literal> terminates the program
then there is no bug. Cppcheck therefore reports no error:</para>
<para>In theory, if <literal>ZeroMemory</literal> terminates the
program then there is no bug. Cppcheck therefore reports no
error:</para>
<programlisting># cppcheck noreturn.c
Checking noreturn.c...</programlisting>
@ -1101,8 +1107,8 @@ Checking noreturn.c...
[noreturn.c:7]: (information) --check-library: Function ZeroMemory() should have &lt;noreturn&gt; configuration
</programlisting>
<para>If a proper <literal>windows.cfg</literal> is provided, the bug is
detected:</para>
<para>If a proper <literal>windows.cfg</literal> is provided, the bug
is detected:</para>
<programlisting># cppcheck --library=windows.cfg noreturn.c
Checking noreturn.c...
@ -1131,8 +1137,8 @@ Checking noreturn.c...
}</programlisting>
<para>In case <literal>strcmp</literal> has side effects, such as
assigning the result to one of the parameters passed to it, nothing bad
would happen:</para>
assigning the result to one of the parameters passed to it, nothing
bad would happen:</para>
<programlisting># cppcheck useretval.c
Checking useretval.c...</programlisting>
@ -1157,8 +1163,8 @@ Checking useretval.c...
<section>
<title>Example configuration for strcpy()</title>
<para>The proper configuration for the standard strcpy() function would
be:</para>
<para>The proper configuration for the standard strcpy() function
would be:</para>
<programlisting> &lt;function name="strcpy"&gt;
&lt;leak-ignore/&gt;
@ -1181,14 +1187,14 @@ Checking useretval.c...
function returns or not.</para>
<para>The first argument that the function takes is a pointer. It must
not be a null pointer, therefore <literal>&lt;not-null&gt;</literal> is
used.</para>
not be a null pointer, therefore <literal>&lt;not-null&gt;</literal>
is used.</para>
<para>The second argument the function takes is a pointer. It must not
be null. And it must point at initialized data. Using
<literal>&lt;not-null&gt;</literal> and
<literal>&lt;not-uninit&gt;</literal> is correct. Moreover it must point
at a zero-terminated string so &lt;strz&gt; is also used.</para>
<literal>&lt;not-uninit&gt;</literal> is correct. Moreover it must
point at a zero-terminated string so &lt;strz&gt; is also used.</para>
</section>
</section>