From 5dea79a07d7b77d5e60edbb3baa648c5dc7e0423 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Daniel=20Marjam=C3=A4ki?= <danielm77@spray.se>
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 19:56:13 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] cppcheckError: Rephrazed the error message. The 'internal
 error' sounds like something dangerous happens that needs to be fixed. So I
 think 'analysis failed' is better. If the code has a syntax error then
 'analysis failed' is entirely ok.

---
 lib/tokenize.cpp | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/lib/tokenize.cpp b/lib/tokenize.cpp
index 5184e3efb..868184a60 100644
--- a/lib/tokenize.cpp
+++ b/lib/tokenize.cpp
@@ -8136,7 +8136,7 @@ void Tokenizer::cppcheckError(const Token *tok) const
 
     const ErrorLogger::ErrorMessage errmsg(locationList,
                                            Severity::error,
-                                           "### Internal error in Cppcheck. Please report it.",
+                                           "Analysis failed. If the code is valid then please report this failure.",
                                            "cppcheckError");
 
     if (_errorLogger)