reverted ee14ea4f
. I think this fix was too generic. If there is a union in the struct then only the union members should be skipped.
This commit is contained in:
parent
ee14ea4fc2
commit
698e9e2b59
|
@ -1101,22 +1101,11 @@ void CheckUninitVar::checkScope(const Scope* scope)
|
|||
for (std::size_t j = 0U; j < symbolDatabase->classAndStructScopes.size(); ++j) {
|
||||
const Scope *scope2 = symbolDatabase->classAndStructScopes[j];
|
||||
if (scope2->className == structname && scope2->numConstructors == 0U) {
|
||||
bool hasUnion = false;
|
||||
for (std::list<Scope*>::const_iterator childscope = scope2->nestedList.begin();
|
||||
childscope != scope2->nestedList.end();
|
||||
++childscope) {
|
||||
if ((*childscope)->type == Scope::eUnion)
|
||||
hasUnion = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (hasUnion)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
for (std::list<Variable>::const_iterator it = scope2->varlist.begin(); it != scope2->varlist.end(); ++it) {
|
||||
const Variable &var = *it;
|
||||
if (!var.isArray())
|
||||
checkScopeForVariable(scope, tok, *i, NULL, NULL, var.name());
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -2788,20 +2788,6 @@ private:
|
|||
"}\n", "test.c");
|
||||
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
|
||||
|
||||
checkUninitVar2("struct PIXEL {\n" // union in struct #4970
|
||||
" union {\n"
|
||||
" struct { unsigned char red,green,blue,alpha; };\n"
|
||||
" unsigned int color;\n"
|
||||
" };\n"
|
||||
"};\n"
|
||||
"\n"
|
||||
"unsigned char f() {\n"
|
||||
" struct PIXEL p1;\n"
|
||||
" p1.color = 255;\n"
|
||||
" return p1.red;\n"
|
||||
"}");
|
||||
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
|
||||
|
||||
// return
|
||||
checkUninitVar2("struct AB { int a; int b; };\n"
|
||||
"void f(void) {\n"
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue