Fix #8230: FP unknown evaluation order on comma expression in while clause (#1415)

The while part of a do-while loop looks almost like a function call, so
extend the check for function calls to ignore while-statements.

Note that there was only an FP when checking c-code, since the check is
disabled for c++-code. Therefore, make sure the test cases are run on a
c-file.
This commit is contained in:
rikardfalkeborn 2018-10-09 14:44:01 +02:00 committed by Daniel Marjamäki
parent 20121b34d8
commit 75caf8e4de
2 changed files with 24 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -2672,8 +2672,8 @@ void CheckOther::checkEvaluationOrder()
const Token *par = parent;
while (Token::simpleMatch(par,","))
par = par->astParent();
// not function => break
if (!(par && par->str() == "(" && par->astOperand2()))
// not function or in a while clause => break
if (!(par && par->str() == "(" && par->astOperand2() && par->strAt(-1) != "while"))
break;
// control flow (if|while|etc) => break
if (Token::simpleMatch(par->link(),") {"))

View File

@ -7051,6 +7051,28 @@ private:
" dostuff((t=1,t),2);\n"
"}", "test.c");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
// #8230
check("void hprf(const char* fp) {\n"
" do\n"
" ;\n"
" while (++fp, (*fp) <= 0177);\n"
"}\n", "test.c");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
check("void hprf(const char* fp) {\n"
" do\n"
" ;\n"
" while (i++, ++fp, (*fp) <= 0177);\n"
"}\n", "test.c");
ASSERT_EQUALS("", errout.str());
check("void f(const char* fp) {\n"
" do\n"
" ;\n"
" while (f(++fp, (*fp) <= 7));\n"
"}\n", "test.c");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.c:4]: (error) Expression '++fp,(*fp)<=7' depends on order of evaluation of side effects\n", errout.str());
}
void testEvaluationOrderSizeof() {