walkero
/
cppcheck
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases 1 Wiki Activity

Try to improve 'clarifyStatement' warning message

This commit is contained in:
Daniel Marjamäki 2019-06-22 08:44:41 +02:00
parent 16bed07c60
commit 7ceb51a952
2 changed files with 8 additions and 8 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
lib/checkother.cpp
View File

@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ void CheckOther::clarifyStatement()
void CheckOther::clarifyStatementError(const Token *tok)
{
reportError(tok, Severity::warning, "clarifyStatement", "Ineffective statement similar to '*A++;'. Did you intend to write '(*A)++;'?\n"
reportError(tok, Severity::warning, "clarifyStatement", "In expression like '*A++' the result of '*' is unused. Did you intend to write '(*A)++;'?\n"
"A statement like '*A++;' might not do what you intended. Postfix 'operator++' is executed before 'operator*'. "
"Thus, the dereference is meaningless. Did you intend to write '(*A)++;'?", CWE783, false);
}

14
test/testother.cpp
View File

@ -3384,28 +3384,28 @@ private:
" *c++;\n"
" return c;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (warning) Ineffective statement similar to '*A++;'. Did you intend to write '(*A)++;'?\n", errout.str());
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (warning) In expression like '*A++' the result of '*' is unused. Did you intend to write '(*A)++;'?\n", errout.str());
check("char* f(char** c) {\n"
" *c[5]--;\n"
" return *c;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (warning) Ineffective statement similar to '*A++;'. Did you intend to write '(*A)++;'?\n", errout.str());
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (warning) In expression like '*A++' the result of '*' is unused. Did you intend to write '(*A)++;'?\n", errout.str());
check("void f(Foo f) {\n"
" *f.a++;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (warning) Ineffective statement similar to '*A++;'. Did you intend to write '(*A)++;'?\n", errout.str());
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (warning) In expression like '*A++' the result of '*' is unused. Did you intend to write '(*A)++;'?\n", errout.str());
check("void f(Foo f) {\n"
" *f.a[5].v[3]++;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (warning) Ineffective statement similar to '*A++;'. Did you intend to write '(*A)++;'?\n", errout.str());
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (warning) In expression like '*A++' the result of '*' is unused. Did you intend to write '(*A)++;'?\n", errout.str());
check("void f(Foo f) {\n"
" *f.a(1, 5).v[x + y]++;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (warning) Ineffective statement similar to '*A++;'. Did you intend to write '(*A)++;'?\n", errout.str());
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (warning) In expression like '*A++' the result of '*' is unused. Did you intend to write '(*A)++;'?\n", errout.str());
check("char* f(char* c) {\n"
" (*c)++;\n"
@ -3422,13 +3422,13 @@ private:
" ***c++;\n"
" return c;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (warning) Ineffective statement similar to '*A++;'. Did you intend to write '(*A)++;'?\n", errout.str());
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (warning) In expression like '*A++' the result of '*' is unused. Did you intend to write '(*A)++;'?\n", errout.str());
check("char** f(char*** c) {\n"
" **c[5]--;\n"
" return **c;\n"
"}");
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (warning) Ineffective statement similar to '*A++;'. Did you intend to write '(*A)++;'?\n", errout.str());
ASSERT_EQUALS("[test.cpp:2]: (warning) In expression like '*A++' the result of '*' is unused. Did you intend to write '(*A)++;'?\n", errout.str());
check("char*** f(char*** c) {\n"
" (***c)++;\n"