From 9c81695c1292bedbd98480385d5f683d4a7c9688 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Daniel=20Marjam=C3=A4ki?= <danielm77@spray.se>
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 20:13:02 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Manual: minor tweaks. remark that it is not certain that
 fixing 'performance' messages will have a positive effect on the speed. and
 in general it doesn't make the code more readable.

---
 man/manual.docbook | 14 +++++---------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/man/manual.docbook b/man/manual.docbook
index f1ecfd90f..e98543259 100644
--- a/man/manual.docbook
+++ b/man/manual.docbook
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
   <bookinfo>
     <title>Cppcheck 1.46</title>
 
-    <date>2010-12-03</date>
+    <date>2010-12-09</date>
   </bookinfo>
 
   <chapter>
@@ -150,14 +150,10 @@ Checking path/file2.cpp...
         </varlistentry>
       </variablelist>
 
-      <remark>The focus of <literal>Cppcheck</literal> development is to
-      detect bugs, <literal>Cppcheck</literal> is not a
-      style-checker.</remark>
-
-      <remark> Cppcheck doesn't try to detect hotspots so fixing
-      <literal>performance</literal> messages might have no measurable
-      difference. Fixing performance messages doesn't make your code more
-      readable.</remark>
+      <remark>The performance messages are based on 'common knowledge'. It is
+      not certain that fixing performance messages will make any measurable
+      difference in speed. Fixing performance messages generally doesn't make
+      your code more readable.</remark>
     </section>
 
     <section>