walkero
/
cppcheck
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases 1 Wiki Activity

Fixed typos. No functional changes. [ci-skip]

This commit is contained in:
orbitcowboy 2015-03-30 16:41:53 +02:00
parent f7c724e3eb
commit d379ebed2d
2 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
cmake/printInfo.cmake
View File

@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ endif()
if(${ANALYZE_ADDRESS}) if(${ANALYZE_ADDRESS})
message("##########################################################") message("##########################################################")
message(STATUS "For better visualitation change enviroment variable: ASAN_SYMBOLIZER_PATH=/path/to/llvm-symbolizer") message(STATUS "For better visualization change environment variable: ASAN_SYMBOLIZER_PATH=/path/to/llvm-symbolizer")
message(STATUS "Detect memory leaks, change enviroment variable: ASAN_OPTIONS=\"detect_leaks=1\"") message(STATUS "Detect memory leaks, change environment variable: ASAN_OPTIONS=\"detect_leaks=1\"")
message("##########################################################") message("##########################################################")
endif() endif()

4
man/manual.docbook
View File

@ -1053,14 +1053,14 @@ Checking useretval.c...
<define name="NULL_VALUE" value="0"/> <define name="NULL_VALUE" value="0"/>
&lt;/def&gt;</programlisting> &lt;/def&gt;</programlisting>
<para>Each occurence of "NULL_VALUE" in the code would then be replaced <para>Each occurrence of "NULL_VALUE" in the code would then be replaced
by "0" at preprocessor stage.</para> by "0" at preprocessor stage.</para>
</section> </section>
<section> <section>
<title>podtype</title> <title>podtype</title>
<para>Lots of code relies on typedefs providing platform independant <para>Lots of code relies on typedefs providing platform independent
types. "podtype"-tags can be used to provide necessary information to types. "podtype"-tags can be used to provide necessary information to
cppcheck to support them. Without further information, cppcheck does not cppcheck to support them. Without further information, cppcheck does not
understand the type "uint16_t" in the following example:</para> understand the type "uint16_t" in the following example:</para>