Fix in MISRA rule 6.1 check (#3458)

This commit is contained in:
Dani Martin 2021-09-22 19:25:02 +02:00 committed by GitHub
parent edd435d5f0
commit f01ffddca6
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
2 changed files with 3 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -1693,7 +1693,7 @@ class MisraChecker:
continue
if data.standards.c == 'c89':
if token.valueType.type != 'int':
if token.valueType.type != 'int' and not isUnsignedType(token.variable.typeStartToken.str):
self.reportError(token, 6, 1)
elif data.standards.c == 'c99':
if token.valueType.type == 'bool':
@ -1702,7 +1702,7 @@ class MisraChecker:
isExplicitlySignedOrUnsigned = False
typeToken = token.variable.typeStartToken
while typeToken:
if typeToken.isUnsigned or typeToken.isSigned:
if typeToken.isUnsigned or typeToken.isSigned or isUnsignedType(typeToken.str):
isExplicitlySignedOrUnsigned = True
break

View File

@ -252,6 +252,7 @@ struct struct_with_bitfields
signed long f:2; // 6.1 - signed long not compliant
unsigned int g:1; // Compliant
signed int h:1; // 6.2 - signed int with size 1 is not compliant
uint16_t i:1; // Compliant
};
static void misra6_1_fn(void) {