d4bd3016da
ExprEngine; Improved handling of for loop, loop variable
2020-06-28 17:28:40 +02:00
c42c751d61
ExprEngine; Fixed testing
2020-06-28 13:41:27 +02:00
e1704f2b50
Bug hunting; fix juliet test cases error id
2020-06-28 08:16:46 +02:00
bcaf792e30
Bug hunting; Fix FP for struct with uninitialized members passed to function in C
2020-06-27 22:11:12 +02:00
d353a4ecba
ExprEngine; copy Data => copy arrays
2020-06-27 18:09:43 +02:00
e6aa96d90f
Bug hunting; Improved uninit checking
2020-06-27 14:59:02 +02:00
e19ef6ac62
Bug hunting; Improved uninit checking for function calls with constant parameter
2020-06-27 14:15:53 +02:00
ff5a717fc6
Bug hunting; Avoid false positives for const parameter data
2020-06-27 12:17:11 +02:00
b09bcdc38c
Use ValueFlow for compareBoolExpressionWithInt
2020-06-27 08:13:22 +02:00
1ad70bbeb8
Merge pull request #2697 from pfultz2/unique_lock
...
Extend mutex checking for more locking patterns
2020-06-27 07:32:26 +02:00
c3749625f3
Merge pull request #2688 from jpyllman/fix_chklibfunc
...
not report locally declared functions as missing configuration of --check-library
2020-06-27 06:53:09 +02:00
72bdeb9307
Merge pull request #2698 from pfultz2/const-param-casts
...
Fix issue 9778: False positive: constParameter when returning non-const reference cast
2020-06-27 06:45:30 +02:00
cf475fab51
Fix issue 9778: False positive: constParameter when returning non-const reference cast
2020-06-26 15:47:59 -05:00
f5ace9ffbe
SymbolDatabase; Improved ValueType when container methods items
2020-06-26 22:47:28 +02:00
82b91869ee
Extend mutex checking for more locking patterns
2020-06-26 15:06:20 -05:00
b33326bf51
windows.cfg: Added a regression test for GetSystemInfo that ensure no uninitvar-FP is shown.
2020-06-26 20:45:18 +02:00
cb8396aaf8
Merge pull request #2696 from pfultz2/getTokenArgumentFunction-ast
...
Fix issue 9710 and 9767: Use AST to get function from argument
2020-06-26 09:50:18 +02:00
af6e76d623
Fixed #9787 (Better handling of user defined literals)
2020-06-25 22:06:34 +02:00
1676ad5f45
Fix issue 9710 and 9767: Use AST to get function from argument
2020-06-25 12:54:46 -05:00
ec8fbb1580
Merge pull request #2682 from pfultz2/check-mutexes
...
Add new check for incorrect usage of mutexes and lock guards
2020-06-25 16:21:36 +02:00
3c10a9c659
Update message
2020-06-24 18:09:30 -05:00
a87686911a
one more test updated for the new checkLibraryFunction
2020-06-23 09:06:54 +02:00
9b5986505e
AST; Improved ast for variable declaration with assignment
2020-06-22 08:34:31 +02:00
f792cabc2b
ExprEngine; better handling of containers
2020-06-21 21:48:36 +02:00
5497e8ed67
ExprEngine; Improved handling of stream read
2020-06-21 20:05:26 +02:00
8ec5605bac
Merge pull request #2689 from Ken-Patrick/9769
...
9769: Improve value flow for ternary operator
2020-06-21 13:04:43 +02:00
f270ca1909
ExprEngine; Better handling of function calls
2020-06-20 23:00:39 +02:00
5a3789a23f
9769: Improve value flow for ternary operator
...
In some cases, the condition of the ternary operator is assigned a known
value after the two possible results, and in such cases, we would not
take the opportunity to assign a value to the ternary operator (and to
the other parents in the ast).
This patch adds this capability.
2020-06-20 10:29:28 +02:00
aa380e0de1
fix a test that was suppressed because #9002
2020-06-19 23:04:15 +02:00
af45148e58
ExprEngine; Refactor and improve code. Add tests for increments.
2020-06-19 20:40:20 +02:00
06aeac75dc
Bug hunting; Fix false negatives
2020-06-19 18:38:02 +02:00
6ec15b6d7b
ExprEngine; Simple handling of increment/decrement
2020-06-19 17:35:35 +02:00
f516bde744
ExprEngine; Fix TODO assertion
2020-06-19 14:05:19 +02:00
ab663feea8
Add testbughuntingchecks.cpp
2020-06-19 13:38:56 +02:00
d0ac583b97
Add 'bughuntingchecks'
2020-06-19 13:16:48 +02:00
d3df68e376
Updated bug hunting test
2020-06-18 14:31:51 +02:00
f7029e62ac
Check for mor FPs
2020-06-17 17:06:06 -05:00
3f8218af1b
Removed CheckClass::operatorEq: does not 'belong'
2020-06-17 20:35:43 +02:00
c297ed8204
Better handle noreturn or throwing functions in valueflow
...
Teaching cppcheck about `BOOST_THROW_EXCEPTION` and
`boost::throw_exception`, and using noreturn information from libraries
in value flow.
This fixes false positive nullPointerRedundantCheck with the following
code:
```
void throwexception(int * buf)
{
if (!buf)
boost::throw_exception(std::bad_alloc());
*buf = 0;
}
```
2020-06-17 19:06:14 +02:00
21f76d62a1
Merge branch 'main' into check-mutexes
2020-06-17 10:45:43 -05:00
51a6af299f
Merge pull request #2683 from Ken-Patrick/cast_expandTemplate
...
Fix handling of c++ casts in template expansion
2020-06-17 09:21:01 +02:00
94f92f00fe
Merge pull request #2684 from firewave/precompiled
...
use precompiled headers if CMake supports it
2020-06-17 07:53:51 +02:00
4947a3b7ab
Bug hunting; review and improve handling of multi dimensional arrays
2020-06-16 22:50:45 +02:00
a49d60f0b3
use precompiled headers if CMake supports it
2020-06-16 19:56:53 +02:00
5c1a2db434
Fix handling of c++ casts in template expansion
...
Cast were not expanded properly: the `<` was not taken into account in
typeindentlevel, so we would then miss a `>`, resulting in syntaxError.
2020-06-16 19:36:04 +02:00
18225ee27e
Update text and change to warnings
2020-06-16 10:32:39 -05:00
172537807b
Add check for incorrect usage of mutexes and lock guards
2020-06-15 19:40:54 -05:00
6faad9cd90
Bug hunting; better handling when assigning multidimensional array in for loop
2020-06-15 22:42:45 +02:00
f5fe5ca2dd
9768: Fix ast with throw in the middle of return ( #2678 )
...
* 9768: Fix ast with throw in the middle of return
```
int f(bool x)
{
return x ? 0 : throw 0;
}
```
The `throw` part was not included in the ast, leading to an invalid
ternary operator.
* 8526: Fix ast construction for ternary operator
This tries to decide a bit more properly when ':' can be part of a
ternary operator. More precisely, there are some times when we want to
delay the construction of the ast for ':', so that it is place
accordingly to the matching '?'.
Typically, this fixes an issue with
`return val < 0 ? throw 1 : val;`,
where the ast for ':' would be constructed during as part of the
`throw`, and the ast for `?` would be invalid.
This patch is a bit of a hardcode, stating that we don't expect ':'
inside a throw, unless there is a complete ternary operator in there
(there can't be a range based for loop, a case in a switch). When we
reach ':', we know we are and the end of the `throw`.
2020-06-15 10:36:02 +02:00
3fe2b6fe50
Update test. An inconclusive warning message is now shown.
2020-06-14 22:57:50 +02:00
Daniel Marjamäki
Paul
orbitcowboy
Jens Yllman
Ken-Patrick Lehrmann
firewave