* Added parsing suppressions from dump xml.
* Added code to dump suppressions to an xml file
* Added declaration for dump function
* Suppressions will now be written to the xml file when a dump is requested
* Fixed syntax error
* Removed excess whitespace
* Fixed indentation to be consistent
* Fixed indentation to be consistent
* Fixed indentation to be consistent
* Added missing include for ErrorLogger::toXml
* Fixed suggestions from pull request #1166
Switched to using ranged for loop to iterate through suppressions.
Made the line number attribute optional, rather than 0 if not specified. This means when Python deserialises it it will be None, which is more pythonic.
* Implemented checking suppressions in reportError
This modification expects suppressions and a function to be called to write a line of output to be passed in. The function checks if any of the suppressions match the warning (with the new Suppression.isMatch function) and if so returns None. This change maintains the old behaviour of returning the warning text, but adds the possibility of returning None if the warning was suppressed.
* Fixed code quality warnings
* Removed more extraneous whitespace
Introduce a new bool setting jointSuppressionReport
that will be set by the analyseWholeProgram() code path.
When the flag is enabled, unmatched suppressions are
collected after running the final whole program analysis
to prevent false positives for the unusedFunction check.
The check functions in the unit test
for single / multi file suppressions were unified.
1. fix typos / misspellings
- Fix misspelling within comments, variable/function names, stdout messages
- changes the name of an error code: ```stlBoundries``` changed to ```stlBoundaries```. Alias old name (```stlBoundries```) to the new one.
2. fix gcc v3.4.6 32bit & 64bit warnings
- fixes gcc v3.4.6 warnings, except for those in tinyxml and "-Wmissing-declarations" makefile warnings
- in Preprocessor::handleIncludes(), replace a ```vector <bool>``` with ```stack<bool>``` (see ```vector<bool>``` warning below).
- this is the only ```vector<bool>``` in the codebase
- ```vector <bool>``` is actually a case of template specialization, and is not recommended, according to the following links:
http://stackoverflow.com/q/6461487http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2007/n2160.htmlhttp://stackoverflow.com/q/670308
- in the codebase before and after this change, testrunner SEGVs in a number of places on gcc v3.4.6, including ```Check::~Check()```, among others
- fc42fc95 fixes this particular runtime issue for DJGPP & __sun
- Removed redundant newlines at the end of test cases
- Make use of STL algorithms instead of own implementations of std::replace and std::remove+string::erase
- Removed unused variable (found by cppcheck)
- Prefer postfix increment (found by cppcheck)
I want to use Suppressions class also in GUI. And that is easier
to do when it is not internal class of Settings class. And in
general is it more natural that Settings class only contains list
of suppressions and implementation is separate.
orbitcowboy
Daniel Marjamäki
rebnridgway
jrp2014
Ayaz Salikhov
PKEuS
Lauri Nurmi
Dmitry-Me
Thomas Jarosch
Andrew C. Martin
Reijo Tomperi
XhmikosR
Daniel Marjamäki
Kimmo Varis