* MISRA: Allow printing of the suppressed rules to the console
--show-suppressed-rules will print rules in the suppression rule list to
the console sorted by rule number.
* MISRA: Correct rule suppression for entire file scope
The entire file scope suppression check was checking for the rule item
list to be None instead of looking for None as an entry into the list.
Correct this check and modify the documentation to explicitly state that
an entry of None in the rule item list will set the scope for that
suppression to be the entire file.
* MISRA: Tests for checking per-file rule suppressions
To run:
../../cppcheck --suppressions-list=suppressions.txt --dump misra-suppressions*-test.c
python ../misra.py misra-suppressions*-test.c.dump
There should be no violations reported
* MISRA: Allow ignoring a prefix from file paths when suppression matching
For environments that run cppcheck from the build system cppcheck may be
passed a filename that is a complete path.
Often this path will include a portion that is specific to the developer
or to the environment where the project is located.
The per-file suppression rules do filename matching based on the
filename passed to cppcheck. To match any path information also has to
be included into the suppressions file provided to cppcheck via the
--suppressions-list= option.
This limits the usefulness of the per-file based suppressions because
it requires the suppression to be customized on a per instance basis.
Add a option "--file-prefix" that allows a prefix to be excluded from
the file path when doing the suppression filename matching.
Example.
Given the following structure:
/test/path1/misra-suppressions1-test.c
/test/path1/misra-suppressions2-test.c
specifying --file-prefix /test/path1 will allow the use of
misra-suppressions1-test.c and misra-suppressions2-test.c as filenames
in the suppressions file without leading patch information but still
match the suppression rule.
* MISRA: Tests for --file-prefix option
To run:
../../cppcheck --suppressions-list=suppressions.txt \
--dump misra-suppressions*-test.c \
path1/misra-suppressions*-test.c
python ../misra.py misra-suppressions*-test.c.dump \
path1/misra-suppressions*-test.c
There should be no violations reported
Add function isStandardFunction() that checks if the given function is a standard function.
Only when this function returns true for the currently checked rand() tokens it is reported as a violation.
Tests added for C and C++.
* Added rule 5.2
* updated 5.2
request-checks: true
* Added rule 5.3
* Changed rule 5.4, 5.5
* Updated test suite for Rule 5.2
* Changes in Rule 5.4 and 5.5
* Change in function name in test suite and removed type from class token in cppcheck
* Changed the name of function in misra-test.c
* Modified rule 5.3
* Modified misra-test.c for rule 5.3
* Added rule 5.2
* updated 5.2
request-checks: true
* Added rule 5.3
* Changed rule 5.4, 5.5
* Updated test suite for Rule 5.2
* Changes in Rule 5.4 and 5.5
* Change in function name in test suite and removed type from class token in cppcheck
* Changed the name of function in misra-test.c
Richard A. Smith
Daniel Marjamäki
Sebastian
Konrad Grochowski
Swasti Shrivastava
orbitcowboy
amai2012