Commit Graph

440 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Daniel Marjamäki b67cb077a3 fix unit test failure 2011-10-29 12:21:22 +02:00
Richard Quirk 665cdfabdc Warn when sizeof is used in strncmp ticket #2095
This checks for the case where the user thought sizeof(buf) gave the
size in bytes of 'buf' in code like the following:

  const char *buf = "Hello World";
  strncmp(buf, other, sizeof(buf));
2011-10-28 22:14:55 +02:00
Richard Quirk 90c7db15a0 Add check for comparison of identical string variables 2011-10-28 22:12:51 +02:00
Richard Quirk 4ba6ac7332 Add strncmp to the list of static string comparison functions 2011-10-28 22:12:51 +02:00
Thomas Jarosch 9a1b195d79 Fixed #3187 (Remove code duplication in 'other' unit test) 2011-10-23 12:20:43 +02:00
Reijo Tomperi 3568b5a841 Improved memset with 0 bytes check. TODO done (unit test).
Patch from: PKEuS <philipp.kloke@web.de>
2011-10-22 23:34:10 +03:00
Edoardo Prezioso 91c6608175 Improve fix of #934 (be careful of macros code). 2011-10-22 20:43:42 +02:00
PKEuS 20179673ce Fixed #934 (new check: missuse of std::cout) 2011-10-22 17:12:52 +02:00
Edoardo Prezioso 9e5beab4a8 Nitpicky fix of the missing ';' after the memset command inside the test case. 2011-10-20 21:46:34 +02:00
PKEuS ea02bd905a Fixed #3225 (Boolean comparison with string literals) 2011-10-18 21:37:03 +02:00
Daniel Marjamäki 6f8e42a5af changed the astyle formatting flags 2011-10-13 20:53:06 +02:00
Zachary Blair 82366918ff Fixed #2627 (switch case fall through: redundant strcpy) 2011-10-13 01:27:22 -07:00
Thomas Jarosch 849bee8437 [PATCH] Detect suspicious use of semicolon after 'if/for/while'
statements if they are followed by a {..} block.

Examples are:

for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i);
{
   printf("i)";
}

or

if (i == 100);
{
   die("Wrong argument");
}

This new check is active if you enable inconclusive checks.
2011-10-11 08:41:39 +02:00
Zachary Blair fcf360825a Fixed #2955 (New check: Using && instead of &) 2011-10-10 10:11:17 -07:00
PKEuS 5f9b916dcc Fixed #2115 (new check: endless loop (unsigned comparison that is always true)) 2011-10-09 20:35:46 +02:00
Thomas Jarosch 7d13d25638 Fixed #3181 (Add missing return statements) 2011-10-08 12:45:56 +02:00
Daniel Marjamäki 73fb6725e6 Readded CheckOther::bitwiseOnBoolean as inconclusive check 2011-10-06 22:01:48 +02:00
Daniel Marjamäki 09109f19f8 Removed CheckOther::bitwiseOnBoolean check. The reasons can be seen in my comments in ticket #3062. 2011-10-05 20:46:07 +02:00
PKEuS 494d3af3d1 Fixed #1877 (Be more strict about int vs. bool, part II) 2011-10-05 20:30:36 +02:00
Kimmo Varis 3cfe7ca1a7 Move "information" errors to "style" errors.
"information" severity is documented in lib/errorlogger.h as:

  Checking information.
  Information message about the checking (process) itself. These
  messages inform about header files not found etc issues that are
  not errors in the code but something user needs to know.

It IS NOT for errors in the code. All the current "information"-
severity errors fit nicely into description of the "style"-
severity.

We definitely need to separate processing information and actual
errors in the code. It is highly confusing for users to mix these
two different things. Hence all current "information" code error
messages are moved to "style" category.

Ticket: #3165 (Stop misusing the 'information' error severity!)
2011-10-05 20:44:00 +03:00
Robert Reif 2d717d77cd reduce false negatives for checking for CheckOther::checkSignOfUnsignedVariable() 2011-09-26 21:24:34 -04:00
Robert Reif 302daeb9bd add test for #3110 (false positve: style) Boolean result is used in bitwise operation. Clarify expression with parentheses) 2011-09-12 20:46:00 -04:00
Daniel Marjamäki 55230baf78 Fixed #3086 (false positive: Boolean result is used in bitwise operation.) 2011-09-11 09:46:01 +02:00
Philipp Kloke 2f62d180fe Fixed #1740 (Undefined Behavior: Divide by zero) 2011-09-10 16:12:53 +02:00
seb777 074ad10a30 fix #195 Unusual shift operation - check this kind of code
return x >> ! y ? 8 : 2;
2011-09-06 22:37:19 +02:00
seb777 5c7ed46e0c Following the discussion XX, replace the keyword C99 '_Bool' with the 'bool' keyword in the process of tokenization\nSee f29b7f9f08 2011-09-03 23:15:33 +02:00
Daniel Marjamäki d23c58d387 enable: break out 'performance' and 'portability' from the 'style' id. Ticket: #3074 2011-09-03 15:30:30 +02:00
Robert Reif f29b7f9f08 fix #3062 (false negative: Boolean variable is used in bitwise operation) 2011-09-02 17:19:06 -04:00
Robert Reif 6f3131da8c fix a serious symbol database bug where parts of a function could be skipped 2011-08-23 20:12:29 -04:00
Robert Reif 9fbef3ca7b fix #3011 (new check: when first comparison is true, the 2nd comparison is always true) 2011-08-19 13:28:37 -04:00
Daniel Marjamäki a735790e77 using boolean result in bitwise operation. fix false positive for '.. != (char *) &x' 2011-08-19 18:55:20 +02:00
Daniel Marjamäki 2dd1e290eb fixed false positives for the 'bitwise operator / comparison operator' check 2011-08-19 18:06:28 +02:00
Daniel Marjamäki 314d5f1e79 fixed false positive for 'using bitwise operation on boolean result' 2011-08-19 17:07:26 +02:00
Daniel Marjamäki c107fdd2d4 Fixed #3018 (false positive: (style) Suspicious condition (assignment+comparison), it can be clarified with parentheses) 2011-08-19 13:54:06 +02:00
Daniel Marjamäki 40b493e621 Improve check: Clarify condition (using boolean result in bitwise operation) 2011-08-19 13:40:54 +02:00
Daniel Marjamäki 4606251ce8 Fixed #3001 (False Positive: Redundant assignment to itself) 2011-08-19 07:23:11 +02:00
Daniel Marjamäki e5ff920ea9 Suspicious condition: Better handling when rhs is non-numeric 2011-08-19 00:56:15 +02:00
Daniel Marjamäki a7728fef48 New check: warn about such suspicious conditions: '(a & b == c)' 2011-08-19 00:15:20 +02:00
Kimmo Varis cfcfa3f000 Use "enabled" list for the style checking.
Settings-class currently enables style checking via dedicated
boolean attribute. All other CLI's enable-options are handled
through the enable-list. This commit moves style-check enabling
to use the enable-list.

Main advantage is the consistency how options are handled/stored
in the Settings class. Which also unifies using them for the other
code. You need to enable certain type of checks? Use the
addEnabled()-method. You want to check if certain type of checks
are enabled? Use the isEnabled()-method.
2011-08-07 10:28:52 +03:00
Robert Reif 85b2bd21dc fix #2968 (new check: testing if unsigned variable is less than 0) 2011-08-06 19:23:09 -04:00
Daniel Marjamäki dc629b4c39 Fixed 'possible null pointer dereference' warning messages 2011-07-28 08:12:21 +02:00
Daniel Marjamäki d2c0e5e7e6 Fixed #2821 (New Check : bool pointer null truth assignment) 2011-07-28 07:28:24 +02:00
Robert Reif 76d0872c0d made #2827 fix more generic by adding more ops and using pattern matching rather than string matching 2011-07-17 16:28:00 -04:00
Robert Reif 4149617978 fix #2827 to use numeric comparisons 2011-07-16 23:05:35 -04:00
Robert Reif 430d22032d fix #2827 condition always false or true) 2011-07-16 22:06:23 -04:00
Zachary Blair 997a3652d2 Fixed #2822 (New check: Duplicate break statements in switch) 2011-07-14 17:12:56 -07:00
seb777 e06b2419a4 fix #2786 (new check: Using sizeof with numeric constant)
Add unit test and improve check with negative constant because in cppcheck %num%
means 'integer'
2011-05-28 16:40:01 +08:00
seb777 287840e6bc fix #2786 2011-05-25 01:45:58 +08:00
Robert Reif 2db67863a7 #2700 (common logic or cut and paste errors) make duplicate branches inclnclusive 2011-05-08 13:22:42 -04:00
Daniel Marjamäki 3629f953f0 Fixed #2770 (False positives (scope can be reduced / variable is assigned value that is never used)) 2011-05-06 21:16:01 +02:00