Richard Quirk
a3f2c1e651
Improve for same expression on both sides of operator
2011-11-05 15:46:11 +01:00
PKEuS
0c469bae41
Fixed #3089 (New Check: Detect wrong usage of printf/scanf)
2011-11-05 07:29:53 +01:00
Edoardo Prezioso
4295439e53
Fixed ticket #3269 (Regression, I think it's somehow related to symbol database)
2011-10-31 15:05:52 +01:00
Edoardo Prezioso
ba5909ef1d
General code tweaking, nothing strange.
2011-10-31 02:24:59 +01:00
Edoardo Prezioso
4fc7e86d7d
Fixed: with checkConst and checkVariableScope wanted still required "information" settings instead of "style".
2011-10-30 10:58:15 +01:00
Daniel Marjamäki
3c509589b5
use reportInconclusiveError instead of reportError if checking is inconclusive
2011-10-29 15:16:27 +02:00
Daniel Marjamäki
f04210ad9f
updated comment. removed a inconclusive condition, I don't think it's needed.
2011-10-29 12:52:46 +02:00
Daniel Marjamäki
6c02de151f
strncmp sizeof: tweaked the check.
2011-10-29 12:27:19 +02:00
Daniel Marjamäki
8416768e03
Merge pull request #50 from richq/strncmp
...
Improved strncmp checks
* strings are always the same
* inconclusive: using sizeof(char *) as size parameter
2011-10-29 03:13:21 -07:00
Richard Quirk
45d0709ed5
Only run sizeof(char*) check if inconclusive is set
2011-10-29 11:59:24 +02:00
Richard Quirk
c2d7824130
Move string comparison out of the report function
2011-10-29 11:52:19 +02:00
Edoardo Prezioso
dd719b41bf
Definitely check correctly 'sizeof %num%' when '%num%' has '-' sign.
2011-10-29 00:11:38 +02:00
Richard Quirk
665cdfabdc
Warn when sizeof is used in strncmp ticket #2095
...
This checks for the case where the user thought sizeof(buf) gave the
size in bytes of 'buf' in code like the following:
const char *buf = "Hello World";
strncmp(buf, other, sizeof(buf));
2011-10-28 22:14:55 +02:00
Richard Quirk
90c7db15a0
Add check for comparison of identical string variables
2011-10-28 22:12:51 +02:00
Richard Quirk
4ba6ac7332
Add strncmp to the list of static string comparison functions
2011-10-28 22:12:51 +02:00
Thomas Jarosch
434fb933a8
Implement Token::findsimplematch und use it for simple patterns
2011-10-27 15:59:22 +02:00
Thomas Jarosch
54adb910ec
Use Token::simpleMatch instead of Token::Match for simple patterns
2011-10-27 15:59:22 +02:00
seb777
de71c41379
Fixed Ticket 2144 (false negatives: Old Style Pointer Cast apply only on .cpp files)
2011-10-26 21:17:27 +02:00
Reijo Tomperi
3568b5a841
Improved memset with 0 bytes check. TODO done (unit test).
...
Patch from: PKEuS <philipp.kloke@web.de>
2011-10-22 23:34:10 +03:00
Edoardo Prezioso
91c6608175
Improve fix of #934 (be careful of macros code).
2011-10-22 20:43:42 +02:00
PKEuS
20179673ce
Fixed #934 (new check: missuse of std::cout)
2011-10-22 17:12:52 +02:00
PKEuS
ccf087d2ea
checkMathFunctions: Refactoring the check
2011-10-22 12:31:47 +02:00
PKEuS
ea02bd905a
Fixed #3225 (Boolean comparison with string literals)
2011-10-18 21:37:03 +02:00
Thomas Jarosch
a52b73f9f9
Fix #3208 (Simplify pointer to standard type, C only)
...
The symbol database is unavailable during token simplification
and &data[0] might return something completely different for C++.
Moved code_is_c() from checkOther to Tokenizer.
2011-10-16 08:09:57 +02:00
Daniel Marjamäki
6f8e42a5af
changed the astyle formatting flags
2011-10-13 20:53:06 +02:00
Zachary Blair
82366918ff
Fixed #2627 (switch case fall through: redundant strcpy)
2011-10-13 01:27:22 -07:00
Robert Reif
af6a6f9c2d
run astyle
2011-10-12 09:08:54 -04:00
Thomas Jarosch
849bee8437
[PATCH] Detect suspicious use of semicolon after 'if/for/while'
...
statements if they are followed by a {..} block.
Examples are:
for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i);
{
printf("i)";
}
or
if (i == 100);
{
die("Wrong argument");
}
This new check is active if you enable inconclusive checks.
2011-10-11 08:41:39 +02:00
Zachary Blair
fcf360825a
Fixed #2955 (New check: Using && instead of &)
2011-10-10 10:11:17 -07:00
PKEuS
5f9b916dcc
Fixed #2115 (new check: endless loop (unsigned comparison that is always true))
2011-10-09 20:35:46 +02:00
Daniel Marjamäki
73fb6725e6
Readded CheckOther::bitwiseOnBoolean as inconclusive check
2011-10-06 22:01:48 +02:00
Daniel Marjamäki
09109f19f8
Removed CheckOther::bitwiseOnBoolean check. The reasons can be seen in my comments in ticket #3062 .
2011-10-05 20:46:07 +02:00
PKEuS
494d3af3d1
Fixed #1877 (Be more strict about int vs. bool, part II)
2011-10-05 20:30:36 +02:00
Kimmo Varis
3cfe7ca1a7
Move "information" errors to "style" errors.
...
"information" severity is documented in lib/errorlogger.h as:
Checking information.
Information message about the checking (process) itself. These
messages inform about header files not found etc issues that are
not errors in the code but something user needs to know.
It IS NOT for errors in the code. All the current "information"-
severity errors fit nicely into description of the "style"-
severity.
We definitely need to separate processing information and actual
errors in the code. It is highly confusing for users to mix these
two different things. Hence all current "information" code error
messages are moved to "style" category.
Ticket: #3165 (Stop misusing the 'information' error severity!)
2011-10-05 20:44:00 +03:00
Robert Reif
2d717d77cd
reduce false negatives for checking for CheckOther::checkSignOfUnsignedVariable()
2011-09-26 21:24:34 -04:00
Robert Reif
735ff11469
fix #3110 (false positve: style) Boolean result is used in bitwise operation. Clarify expression with parentheses)
2011-09-12 07:32:55 -04:00
Daniel Marjamäki
55230baf78
Fixed #3086 (false positive: Boolean result is used in bitwise operation.)
2011-09-11 09:46:01 +02:00
Philipp Kloke
2f62d180fe
Fixed #1740 (Undefined Behavior: Divide by zero)
2011-09-10 16:12:53 +02:00
seb777
074ad10a30
fix #195 Unusual shift operation - check this kind of code
...
return x >> ! y ? 8 : 2;
2011-09-06 22:37:19 +02:00
Robert Reif
b27bbea44a
really fix #3079 (Spelling error in unsigned variable check 'never alwayw')
2011-09-05 09:48:59 -04:00
Robert Reif
2250a2dfc3
fix #3079 (Spelling error in unsigned variable check 'never alwayw')
2011-09-05 09:04:27 -04:00
seb777
5c7ed46e0c
Following the discussion XX, replace the keyword C99 '_Bool' with the 'bool' keyword in the process of tokenization\nSee f29b7f9f08
2011-09-03 23:15:33 +02:00
Daniel Marjamäki
d23c58d387
enable: break out 'performance' and 'portability' from the 'style' id. Ticket: #3074
2011-09-03 15:30:30 +02:00
Robert Reif
f29b7f9f08
fix #3062 (false negative: Boolean variable is used in bitwise operation)
2011-09-02 17:19:06 -04:00
Robert Reif
2dd93dff75
move unused variable checks from checkother to checkunusedvar
2011-08-19 14:35:25 -04:00
Robert Reif
9fbef3ca7b
fix #3011 (new check: when first comparison is true, the 2nd comparison is always true)
2011-08-19 13:28:37 -04:00
Daniel Marjamäki
a735790e77
using boolean result in bitwise operation. fix false positive for '.. != (char *) &x'
2011-08-19 18:55:20 +02:00
Daniel Marjamäki
2dd1e290eb
fixed false positives for the 'bitwise operator / comparison operator' check
2011-08-19 18:06:28 +02:00
Robert Reif
eda9ff6fc5
refactor checkother to move error messages to follow check and rename some error functions to end in Error
2011-08-19 11:53:43 -04:00
Daniel Marjamäki
314d5f1e79
fixed false positive for 'using bitwise operation on boolean result'
2011-08-19 17:07:26 +02:00