This uses the lifetime analysis to check when comparing pointer that point to different objects:
```cpp
int main(void)
{
int foo[10];
int bar[10];
int diff;
if(foo > bar) // Undefined Behavior
{
diff = 1;
}
return 0;
}
```
This will now warn for cases like this:
```cpp
auto& f() {
std::vector<int> x;
return x[0];
}
```
It also improves the handling of address of operator, so it can now warn across some function calls, like this:
```cpp
int& f(int& a) {
return a;
}
int* hello() {
int x = 0;
return &f(x);
}
```
This will use the lifetime checker for dangling references. It will find these cases for indirectly assigned reference:
```cpp
int &foo()
{
int s = 0;
int& x = s;
return x;
}
```
This will also fix issue 510 as well:
```cpp
int &f( int k )
{
static int &r = k;
return r;
}
```
This fixes valueflow to have a value for `||` operator here:
```cpp
bool f()
{
bool a = (4 == 3); // <-- 0
bool b = (3 == 3); // <-- 1
return a || b; // <-- 1
}
```
When comparing if the shift is large enough to make the result zero, use
an unsigned long long to make sure the result fits. Also, a check that
avoids setting the value if the shift is equal to or larger than the
number of bits in the operand (this is undefined behaviour). Finally,
add a check to make sure the calculated value is not too large to store.
Add test cases to cover this.
This was detected by an MSVC warning.
valueflow.cpp(1350): warning C4334: '<<' : result of 32-bit shift implicitly
converted to 64 bits (was 64-bit shift intended?)
* valueflow: remove unused variable known
since e4677ae640 will trigger :
lib/valueflow.cpp:506:20: warning: unused variable 'known' [-Wunused-variable]
const bool known = (parent->astOperand1()->hasKnownValue() ||
* templatesimplifier: cleanup
since 48c960f56c showing:
lib/templatesimplifier.h:279:16: warning: private field 'mTokenizer' is not used
[-Wunused-private-field]
Tokenizer *mTokenizer;
This fixes issue in:
```cpp
void f()
{
char stack[512];
RGNDATA *data;
if (data_size > sizeof (stack))
data = malloc (data_size);
else
data = (RGNDATA *)stack;
if ((char *)data != stack)
free (data); // <- data is not stack
}
```
It seems the `ProgramMemory` can't handle two known values(such as int and tok) together. So instead `ValueFlowAfterAssign` runs `ValueFlowForward` with tok values and then runs it with the other values.
This makes arrays non-null in valueflow, so it can catch comparisons against null that is always true:
```cpp
void f(void) {
int buf[42];
if( buf != 0) {;} // << always true
}
```
So this unifies the `valueFlowAfterCondition` so it re-uses more code between checking for integers and container sizes. This should make valueFlowContainer more robust.
It also extends valueflow to support container comparisons such as `if (v.size() < 3)` or `if (v.size() > 3)` using the same mechanism that is used for integers.
Daniel Marjamäki
rikardfalkeborn
Paul Fultz II
practicalswift
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón
Igor