bba6dfb8b2
Fix issue 4744: ValueFlow: known integer result
...
This fixes valueflow to have a value for `||` operator here:
```cpp
bool f()
{
bool a = (4 == 3); // <-- 0
bool b = (3 == 3); // <-- 1
return a || b; // <-- 1
}
```
2019-01-03 07:05:31 +01:00
2b63997c2c
Fixed #8928 (false positive: (style) Variable 'x' is assigned a value that is never used.)
2019-01-02 20:23:02 +01:00
39ceb53578
Comment out code in valueFlowArray. There was too many false positives.
2019-01-02 19:57:11 +01:00
39a96a5a16
ValueFlow: Temporarily comment out valueFlowTerminatingCondition
2019-01-02 19:42:08 +01:00
7a40b85531
Fixed #8906 (Encoding error in XML message: info attribute)
2019-01-02 18:22:12 +01:00
236c88151f
Fixed #8926 (false positive: (style) Condition 's.x<=y' is always true)
2019-01-02 18:05:55 +01:00
3b9828a132
template simplifier: fix crash on daca c++-annotations project ( #1556 )
...
Fix scope info bug on derived template class which caused a use after
free crash when deleting a template forward declaration in a different
scope.
2019-01-02 07:15:45 +01:00
19514331fb
Fixed #8907 (unknown macro not detected)
2019-01-01 19:30:13 +01:00
115be7dfc8
ValueFlow: better FwdAnalysis for complex expressions
2019-01-01 18:23:47 +01:00
be7afac875
ValueFlow: remove handling of == for complex expressions it did not work properly
2019-01-01 17:23:46 +01:00
13ffefc8b8
Valueflow: Fix right shift with more than 31 bits ( #1553 )
...
When comparing if the shift is large enough to make the result zero, use
an unsigned long long to make sure the result fits. Also, a check that
avoids setting the value if the shift is equal to or larger than the
number of bits in the operand (this is undefined behaviour). Finally,
add a check to make sure the calculated value is not too large to store.
Add test cases to cover this.
This was detected by an MSVC warning.
valueflow.cpp(1350): warning C4334: '<<' : result of 32-bit shift implicitly
converted to 64 bits (was 64-bit shift intended?)
2019-01-01 14:15:50 +01:00
a73e989d1a
isConstVarExpression: Fix FPs when there is C++ cast
2019-01-01 11:34:44 +01:00
04d3672bde
Fixed #7203 (Better syntax error, handle array declaration with @)
2019-01-01 09:45:41 +01:00
c37b807613
template simplifier: also check if instantiated template is not specialized ( #1551 )
2018-12-31 21:29:53 +01:00
ac357a96f7
Fixed #7384 (confuses syntax with variable name / "variable '(' is less than zero")
2018-12-31 18:36:06 +01:00
4918a18bfb
ValueFlow: Value of expression after condition
2018-12-31 17:37:38 +01:00
9dc8faa3b6
template simplifier: fix location of forward declaration for explicit specializations ( #1550 )
2018-12-31 17:19:34 +01:00
141ce7cd63
ValueFlow: Use FwdAnalysisAllPaths in ValueFlow to track complex expressions
2018-12-31 17:05:46 +01:00
aa4f61acdf
CTU: Avoid FP in else block
2018-12-31 08:24:39 +01:00
fb6a291370
CTU: Avoid FP in code protected by &&,||,?
2018-12-31 08:16:21 +01:00
6b49a784c5
Fixed #8911 (Regression: False positive: Unassigned variable (alias))
2018-12-30 20:20:20 +01:00
91a580cbd7
CTU: more warnings
2018-12-30 18:31:37 +01:00
c8901e9bab
CTU: Find paths better
2018-12-30 16:23:25 +01:00
da91ce2016
Fixed #6183 (TemplateSimplifier: Does not handle methods) ( #1546 )
...
* Fixed #6183 (TemplateSimplifier: Does not handle methods)
* Fix function lookup.
2018-12-29 11:19:53 +01:00
e4677ae640
Fix issue 8910: Regression: ValueFlow: wrong conditional tokvalue
...
This fixes issue in:
```cpp
void f()
{
char stack[512];
RGNDATA *data;
if (data_size > sizeof (stack))
data = malloc (data_size);
else
data = (RGNDATA *)stack;
if ((char *)data != stack)
free (data); // <- data is not stack
}
```
It seems the `ProgramMemory` can't handle two known values(such as int and tok) together. So instead `ValueFlowAfterAssign` runs `ValueFlowForward` with tok values and then runs it with the other values.
2018-12-29 09:31:21 +01:00
d18f5d8709
CTU: Reuse CheckNullPointer::isPointerDeRef in the nullpointer isUnsafeUsage
2018-12-29 09:26:57 +01:00
03ed4afc70
Export interfaces from cppcheck-core.dll used from testrunner. In turn remove ctu sources from testrunner which are obsolete now.
2018-12-28 23:09:44 +01:00
128ad96b59
Add ctu sources to VS projects
2018-12-27 22:11:40 +01:00
a40fe3c67f
Fixed #7872 (ValueFlow: static_cast)
2018-12-27 21:33:01 +01:00
6fef02498c
Fixed #7263 (False negative: redundant assignment using +=)
2018-12-27 17:27:53 +01:00
271763e680
CTU: Refactoring
2018-12-25 21:11:23 +01:00
a1dca6acd5
Fix CTU nullpointer check
2018-12-25 12:04:01 +01:00
162576146e
Revert "Fixed #6183 (TemplateSimplifier: Does not handle methods) ( #1540 )"
...
This reverts commit 7875555b03
2018-12-24 20:10:00 +01:00
7875555b03
Fixed #6183 (TemplateSimplifier: Does not handle methods) ( #1540 )
2018-12-24 07:25:11 +01:00
611eb81302
Fixed checkcfg: test/cfg/std.cpp:2904:error:uninitvar:Uninitialized variable: s
2018-12-23 18:09:55 +01:00
b79619832e
Clarify warning
2018-12-23 12:42:18 +01:00
e6e3987935
snprintf/g_snprintf: do not allow uninitialized target buffer
2018-12-22 20:40:47 +01:00
48c960f56c
template simplifier: better detection of template functions ( #1539 )
...
* template simplifier: better detection of template functions
* fix comment
2018-12-22 10:05:10 +01:00
204ce795ba
Print test case name in assert
...
I sometimes find myself wondering which test cases I have broken when I fiddle with some check (since I then can try running these specific tests in the debugger, or make a small change and see if the tests pass). This PR adds the testclass and the test case names to the file and line number. I took special care to cover the case where an assert would be placed directly in the ```run()```-function, i.e., not inside a test case (from what I could see, no such case exists). If there is no need to handle this case, the code can be simplified (there wouldn't be need for the ```teardownTest()```-function for example).
The exact format for how to print the test name is very much up for discussion.
2018-12-21 13:55:24 +01:00
d528934139
template simplifier: also remove forward declarations when removing expanded templates ( #1536 )
2018-12-20 20:55:27 +01:00
19e979315f
Correct detection of Microsoft extensions in MathLib::isValidIntegerSuffix. Remove public overloaded implementation which was not used outside mathlib.cpp. ( #1531 )
2018-12-20 12:20:31 +01:00
0f4eac657d
Make script less verbose
2018-12-19 22:18:24 +01:00
c31331d085
template simplifier: fix explicit instantiation with types starting with const and ending in * and &. ( #1530 )
2018-12-19 21:59:59 +01:00
e2c433a0f8
Fixed #8914 (False positive with unary_function argument)
2018-12-19 19:43:05 +01:00
378ffed37e
Address compiler warning
2018-12-19 14:39:04 +01:00
bc34f0239d
Disable the subfunction value flow analysis. It does not work well and needs to be rewritten. There are false positives.
2018-12-18 14:36:49 +01:00
34330b51d1
Fix issue 8905: Condition 'a==0' is always false
...
This fixes the FP in:
```cpp
void f(const int a[]){ if (a == 0){} }
```
2018-12-18 08:16:43 +01:00
1cba78090c
Fix const anonymous struct. ( #1527 )
2018-12-18 08:15:12 +01:00
0f63874c62
Take back the whole program analysis for null pointers and uninitialized variables
2018-12-18 07:56:33 +01:00
643ddd4caa
Code cleanup
2018-12-17 18:54:32 +01:00
Paul Fultz II
Daniel Marjamäki
IOBYTE
rikardfalkeborn
amai2012
orbitcowboy
amai2012