ad352daa08
Fix issue 9535: Syntax Error: AST broken, 'if' doesn't have two operands. ( #2450 )
2019-12-16 12:17:01 +01:00
a241be0ecc
Fixed #9434 (False positive: Out of bounds access when using const pointer)
2019-12-15 20:10:28 +01:00
36f369473e
isPointerDeref: Return false for function declarations
2019-12-15 16:36:46 +01:00
aee9519d21
testsuite: Add x-flow tests
2019-12-15 13:57:27 +01:00
f614d32d6a
Fixed #9519 (Syntax error on valid C++ 'enum {} (a)')
2019-12-15 08:40:04 +01:00
bcfc5924fa
Fixed #9532 (False positive: Out of bounds access in expression 'v[0]' because 'v' is empty.)
2019-12-14 19:04:19 +01:00
06752d75a5
Fix issue 9485: knownConditionTrueFalse false positive with integer constants ( #2447 )
...
* Fix issue 9485: knownConditionTrueFalse false positive with integer constants
* Formatting
2019-12-14 09:15:00 +01:00
0e4efea530
fix #9539 (Syntax error for valid C++14 code) ( #2446 )
2019-12-12 20:50:20 +01:00
370196a14c
Fix extern c typedef syntax error ( #2438 )
...
* Fix extern c typedef syntax error
* Fix extraWhiteSpaceError
* Move test from testgarbage to testtokenize
2019-12-12 13:51:14 +01:00
064795a705
Remove duplicate test
...
This partially reverts commit 047418dda1
2019-12-11 19:17:59 +03:00
6f2879a59b
errorlogger.cpp: Handle empty file-name like "*" (unmatchedSuppression) ( #2440 )
...
Using "--suppress=unmatchedSuppression" did not suppress the error-id in
all files, one needed to specify "*" as file-name. This commit also
allows empty file-names to suppress "unmatchedSuppression", not only "*"
or the exact file-name.
The manual uses the following example for suppressions specified in a
file:
// suppress all uninitvar errors in all files
uninitvar
This example suggests that no "*" has to be used to get suppression in
all files. I think that the command line parameter should work in the
same way.
2019-12-11 09:07:18 +01:00
ad2f71338c
Fix issue 9525: Syntax Error: AST broken, 'if' doesn't have two operands inside lambda ( #2433 )
...
* Fix issue 9525: Syntax Error: AST broken, 'if' doesn't have two operands inside lambda
* Fix incorrect matchers
2019-12-10 21:21:07 +01:00
de4d44ae2f
opencv2.cfg: Add initial OpenCV 2.x API Library Configuration ( #2439 )
2019-12-10 19:34:30 +01:00
4aa6385a97
Regression test for 9106: False positive duplicateCondition for struct member ( #2434 )
2019-12-09 06:51:58 +01:00
f5df06a143
Run astyle [ci skip]
2019-12-08 11:22:19 +01:00
ea2916a3e4
Fix issue 9514: Syntax Error: AST broken, 'for' doesn't have two operands. ( #2429 )
...
* Fix issue 9514: Syntax Error: AST broken, 'for' doesn't have two operands.
* Fix typo
2019-12-07 21:16:25 +01:00
56e17fb228
Fix issue 9524: Syntax Error: AST broken, 'if' doesn't have two operands. ( #2432 )
2019-12-07 21:06:45 +01:00
047418dda1
Improve test coverage for redundant bitwise operations
2019-12-06 19:14:03 +03:00
95e0b0d0f9
Fix #9510 : Crash in valueflow.cpp solveExprValues() (division by zero) ( #2420 )
...
`break` if divider `intval` is 0 to avoid division by 0 as suggested by @pfultz2
Trac ticket: https://trac.cppcheck.net/ticket/9510
2019-12-06 08:08:40 +01:00
f637d97080
Fix 9509 (Syntax error on empty attribute list) ( #2423 )
2019-12-06 05:17:19 +01:00
2978c67e6f
Fix issue 9511: Syntax Error: AST broken, 'if' doesn't have two operands. ( #2428 )
2019-12-06 04:19:46 +01:00
5979eec2c0
Fix 9518 (Syntax error on valid C++) ( #2424 )
2019-12-05 20:51:36 +01:00
7da68bff7b
Improve test coverage for missing destructors
2019-12-05 18:25:50 +03:00
571de5844f
Improve test coverage for functions returning bool values
2019-12-04 18:12:10 +03:00
297efcd049
Avoid some additional memleakOnRealloc false positives ( #2422 )
...
* Avoid some additional memleakOnRealloc false positives
checkReallocUsage() already contains code to suppress the
`p = realloc(p, size)` error message when the pointer has been
previously copied from another variable (hence there is an additional
copy of the original pointer value) within the same function, as in
the added realloc21() test case.
Extend this so that `p = *pp` and `p = ptr->foo` are also recognized
as copies from another variable with the same original pointer value,
as in the added realloc22() and realloc23() test cases.
* Rewrite as a single findmatch() expression
2019-12-04 12:13:44 +01:00
cf7ef2e703
Valid code for incrementing raw pointer ( #2418 )
2019-12-03 18:33:05 +01:00
36977becba
Fix issue 9196: Lambda confuses check ( #2415 )
2019-12-03 18:30:52 +01:00
b14a976c6c
Improve test coverage for postfix increment of raw pointers
2019-12-02 18:12:14 +03:00
78b4485670
Regression for issue 8653: valueFlowAfterCondition: compound conditional ( #2416 )
2019-12-02 11:35:51 +01:00
9cb39b1d7e
Fix issue 9482: False positive: Reference to temporary returned using trailing return type ( #2413 )
2019-12-01 15:10:02 +01:00
f77347d7b4
Fix crash 9492: Crash in FwdAnalysis::checkRecursive() (condTok is nullptr) ( #2411 )
...
* Fix crash 9492: Crash in FwdAnalysis::checkRecursive() (condTok is nullptr)
* Formatting
2019-12-01 14:53:03 +01:00
a71f58ffc2
Fix issue 9441: false positive: new(std::nothrow) and nullPointerRedundantCheck ( #2403 )
...
* Fix issue 9441: false positive: new(std::nothrow) and nullPointerRedundantCheck
* Skip new if it is a variable
2019-12-01 12:16:31 +01:00
79a2e61721
Fix issue 6850: Valueflow: pointer alias, conditional value ( #2402 )
2019-11-30 09:22:03 +01:00
f9d33c07f8
Fix issue 9458: Crash with shadow variables in a lambda ( #2406 )
...
* Fix issue 9458: Crash with shadow variables in a lambda
* Format
2019-11-29 09:45:02 +01:00
f554a71dea
fix #9495 (Crash when parsing angle brackets in template with type traits (assertion failure)) ( #2407 )
2019-11-29 09:44:27 +01:00
676a837af6
Fixed #9335 (FP constStatement "Found a statement that begins with string constant")
2019-11-28 17:49:33 +01:00
ff36ebcff2
Improve test coverage for testing AST
2019-11-28 18:11:55 +03:00
fd900ab8b2
testnullpointer.cpp: Add test for dereferencing returned NULL pointer ( #2401 )
...
This adds a regression test to make sure that directly dereferencing a
returned NULL pointer issues a warning.
This has been asked on Stack Overflow:
https://stackoverflow.com/q/58981369
Cppcheck 1.89 does not warn for such a code, but 1.90 dev does. So it
is a good idea to make sure it is detected in the future too I guess.
2019-11-27 19:41:36 +01:00
8af2ee968e
Fix incorrect usage of "unlikely" hint
2019-11-27 18:08:10 +03:00
45e617f50b
Fix -Wint-conversion warning
2019-11-27 18:08:10 +03:00
937c82efbe
AST: initializer list with lambda
2019-11-27 06:44:58 +01:00
8f72a714d1
Fix -Wint-conversion warning
2019-11-26 18:03:47 +03:00
c3c3d6770c
Fix #9478 : Valueflow: printf does not change value ( #2388 )
...
Format-string arguments are now marked to have `in` direction, except
for `scan`-functions (like `scanf`) where these arguments are explicitly
marked to have `out` direction.
2019-11-24 01:40:31 +01:00
ab2274b8ad
AST: lambdas and scopes in expressions
2019-11-23 21:36:36 +01:00
ebd32cfd73
Syntax error: if (retval==)
2019-11-23 18:50:46 +01:00
fb1d60bfb1
fix syntax error for num.operator std::string()[0] ( #2389 )
2019-11-23 17:42:24 +01:00
5a48ac0c6e
Improve test coverage for invalid use of bool parameters
2019-11-22 18:11:38 +03:00
df952926f8
fix syntax error for a.operator++() ? a.operator--() : 0 ( #2382 )
2019-11-20 22:13:32 +01:00
98488790a1
Improve test coverage for %jd used with scanf()
2019-11-20 18:10:56 +03:00
590aeea8f8
Fix #9483 (Assertion `tok && tok->str() == ">"' failed) ( #2381 )
2019-11-20 07:02:25 +01:00
Paul Fultz II
Daniel Marjamäki
IOBYTE
RobkeBaer
Dmitry-Me
Sebastian
amai2012
John Marshall
Dmitry-Me