As we now fail early on loading of all libraries we no longer need to
explicitly bail out on mandatory ones. This would have also caused
`libraries` and `library` to go out-of-sync and possibly lead to
duplicated loading of the library. It also allows for a
`CppCheckExecutor` to be made private.
Moved the `FileSettings` out of the `Settings` and pass them around
explicitly. They can never be specified at the same time and are used
exclusively. The code hasn't been fully adjusted to reflect this as this
is only the refactoring without any functional changes.
`ImportProject` is not needed outside of the command-line parsing so we
do not need it inside the `Settings` at all. We only use the
`fileSettings` in the executors.
Currently the `AddonInfo` is generated and discarded on each addon
invocation. This leads to an unnecessary process invocation for each
addon on each file.
Also if an addon is completely broken we will still perform the whole
analysis only for it to be failed at the end so we should bail out early
if we know it doesn't work at all.
This is a step onto leveraging the `ThreadExecutor` implementation for
`ProcessExecutor` which is a follow-up to #4870. We need to have the
proper test coverage and the existing implementations working as
expected before we move to the shared code.
Fixes:
- added `--showtime=` tests for all executor implementations
- only print `--showtime=summary` once at the end
- prevents `--showtime=` by multiple threads to be written at the same
time - essentially breaking the output
- reset the timer results before each test
- deprecated `top5` in favor of `top5_file`
- fixed printing for all executors except `ProcessExecutor`
This is in preparation of avoiding accessing `std::cout` directly as
well as streamlining and improving the logging during the settings
parsing. There are no functional changes yet.
This makes the code much more readable. It also makes it less prone to
errors because we do not need to specify the length of the string to
match and the returnvalue is clear.
The code with the bad returnvalue check was never executed and I added a
test to show that.
Windows XP Pro x64 was released on April 25, 2005 and consumer
processors supporting x86-64 have been around almost as long. Although
there are still 32-bit Windows images available there is not much of a
point maintaining support for these. We also never did any x86 builds
for non-Windows platforms in CI so we don't even know if we work on
those. You might still be able to build 32-bit binaries via CMake.
Encountered while investigating https://trac.cppcheck.net/ticket/11708.
This has been like this since the introduction of `internalError` in
b6bcdf2936 (almost ten years ago to the
day). Logging internal errors which bail out(!) of the analysis simply
to `std::cout` for them possibly never to be seen (and also not affected
the exitcode) is pretty bad IMO. They should always be visible.
I also removed the filename from the message as it is already available
(and thus redundant) and its existence should be defined by the
template.
This was introduced in #5279. We were transferring the terminating `\0`
via the pipe and also added another one in the parsing. As we are now
directly writing into a `std::string` these extra characters will now
show up in it. So just get rid of them.
Both are bugprone since they just take the next parameter which doesn't
start with `-`.
Also `--template` has not been documented since
17842394c0 back in 2011(!). And
`--template-location` has never been documented since its induction in
f058d9ad08. That's also why we can have a
short deprecation period.
In cppcheck 2.11.1 (macOS), using `-j 0` actually causes cppcheck to do
nothing–it stalls indefinitely.
I could only find one place where `mSettings.jobs` was validated against
> 0 and it's simply an assert, so you wouldn't hit it in a release
build.
- Require -j >= 1 ✅
- Cap -j at 1024, not 10000 ✅ (I don't even know what would happen if
you created 10,000 threads, but nothing good; likely exhaust virtual
memory or grind the process to a halt). 1024 is still obscene but there
may be some hypercomputers out there that have that many logical cores.
Oliver Stöneberg
chrchr-github
Daniel Marjamäki
Ryan M. Lederman