cppcheck/man/manual.docbook

435 lines
12 KiB
XML

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE book PUBLIC "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.4//EN"
"/usr/share/xml/docbook/schema/dtd/4.4/docbookx.dtd">
<book>
<bookinfo>
<title>Cppcheck</title>
<date>2009-11-14</date>
</bookinfo>
<chapter>
<title>Introduction</title>
<para>Cppcheck is a static analysis tool for C/C++ code - it textually
inspects your C/C++ source code to detect bugs.</para>
<para>Cppcheck detects issues that you will not find with your compiler.
But Cppcheck doesn't detect the types of bugs that compilers
detect.</para>
<para>It is our goal to generate no false positives. We always try to
achieve 0 false positives. There will always be issues that Cppcheck fail
to detect.</para>
<para>Supported platforms:</para>
<itemizedlist>
<listitem>
<para>You can check non-standard code that includes various compiler
extensions, inline assembly code, etc.</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>Cppcheck is supposed to be compilable by any C++ compiler which
handles the latest C++ standard.</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>Cppcheck is supposed to work on any platform that has sufficient
cpu and memory.</para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
</chapter>
<chapter>
<title>Getting started</title>
<section>
<title>First test</title>
<para>Here is a simple code</para>
<programlisting>int main()
{
char a[10];
a[10] = 0;
return 0;
}</programlisting>
<para>If you save that into <filename>file1.c</filename> and
execute:</para>
<programlisting>cppcheck file1.c</programlisting>
<para>The output from cppcheck will then be:</para>
<programlisting>Checking file1.c...
[file1.c:4]: (error) Array index out of bounds</programlisting>
</section>
<section>
<title>Checking all files in a folder</title>
<para>Normally a program has many sourcefiles. And you want to check
them all. Cppcheck can check all sourcefiles in a directory:</para>
<programlisting>cppcheck path</programlisting>
<para>If "path" is a folder then cppcheck will check all sourcefiles in
this folder.</para>
<programlisting>Checking path/file1.cpp...
1/2 files checked 50% done
Checking path/file2.cpp...
2/2 files checked 100% done</programlisting>
</section>
<section>
<title>Possible errors</title>
<para>By default, an error is only reported when
<literal><literal>Cppcheck</literal></literal> is sure there is an
error.</para>
<para>When a likely issue is discovered, <literal>Cppcheck</literal>
bails out without reporting this issue - to prevent false positives. But
with <literal>--all</literal> you can ensure that these issues are
reported.</para>
<para>The <literal>--all</literal> flag is useful but makes
<literal>Cppcheck</literal> more unreliable:</para>
<itemizedlist>
<listitem>
<para>You will probably get false positives</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>Cppcheck can detect issues that it can't detect by
default</para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
<para>Here is a simple code example:</para>
<programlisting>void f()
{
Fred *f = new Fred;
}</programlisting>
<para>Execute this command:</para>
<programlisting>cppcheck --all file1.cpp</programlisting>
<para>The output from Cppcheck:</para>
<programlisting>[file1.cpp:4]: (possible error) Memory leak: fred</programlisting>
<para>The "possible" means that the reported message may be wrong (if
Fred has automatic deallocation it is not a memory leak).</para>
</section>
<section>
<title>Stylistic issues</title>
<para>By default Cppcheck will only check for bugs. There are also a few
checks for stylistic issues.</para>
<para>Here is a simple code example:</para>
<programlisting>void f(int x)
{
int i;
if (x == 0)
{
i = 0;
}
}</programlisting>
<para>To enable stylistic checks, use the --style flag:</para>
<programlisting>cppcheck --style file1.c</programlisting>
<para>The reported error is:</para>
<programlisting>[file3.c:3]: (style) The scope of the variable i can be limited</programlisting>
</section>
<section>
<title>Saving results in file</title>
<para>Many times you will want to save the results in a file. The
results are written to stderr and the progress messages are written to
stdout. So you can use the normal shell redirections to save to
file.</para>
<programlisting>cppcheck file1.c 2&gt; err.txt</programlisting>
</section>
<section>
<title>Unused functions</title>
<para>This check will try to find unused functions. It is best to use
this when the whole program is checked, so that all usages is seen by
cppcheck.</para>
<programlisting>cppcheck --unused-functions path</programlisting>
</section>
</chapter>
<chapter>
<title>XML output</title>
<para>Cppcheck can generate the output in XML format.</para>
<para>Use the --xml flag when you execute cppcheck:</para>
<programlisting>cppcheck --xml file1.cpp</programlisting>
<para>The xml format is:</para>
<programlisting>&lt;?xml version="1.0"?&gt;
&lt;results&gt;
&lt;error file="file1.cpp" line="123" id="someError" severity="error" msg="some error text"/&gt;
&lt;/results&gt;</programlisting>
<para>Attributes:</para>
<variablelist>
<varlistentry>
<term>file</term>
<listitem>
<para>filename. Both relative and absolute paths are possible</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry>
<term>line</term>
<listitem>
<para>a number</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry>
<term>id</term>
<listitem>
<para>id of error. These are always valid symbolnames.</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry>
<term>severity</term>
<listitem>
<para>one of: error / possible error / style / possible style</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry>
<term>msg</term>
<listitem>
<para>the error message</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
</variablelist>
</chapter>
<chapter>
<title>Reformatting the output</title>
<para>If you want to reformat the output so it looks different you can use
templates.</para>
<para>To get Visual Studio compatible output you can use "--template
vs":</para>
<programlisting>cppcheck --template vs gui/test.cpp</programlisting>
<para>This output will look like this:</para>
<programlisting>Checking gui/test.cpp...
gui/test.cpp(31): error: Memory leak: b
gui/test.cpp(16): error: Mismatching allocation and deallocation: k</programlisting>
<para>To get gcc compatible output you can use "--template gcc":</para>
<programlisting>cppcheck --template gcc gui/test.cpp</programlisting>
<para>The output will look like this:</para>
<programlisting>Checking gui/test.cpp...
gui/test.cpp:31: error: Memory leak: b
gui/test.cpp:16: error: Mismatching allocation and deallocation: k</programlisting>
<para>You can write your own pattern (for example a comma-separated
format):</para>
<programlisting>cppcheck --template "{file},{line},{severity},{id},{message}" gui/test.cpp</programlisting>
<para>The output will look like this:</para>
<programlisting>Checking gui/test.cpp...
gui/test.cpp,31,error,memleak,Memory leak: b
gui/test.cpp,16,error,mismatchAllocDealloc,Mismatching allocation and deallocation: k</programlisting>
<para></para>
</chapter>
<chapter>
<title>Suppressions</title>
<para>If you want to filter out certain errors you can suppress these.
First you need to create a suppressions file.</para>
<programlisting>[error id]:[filename]
[error id]:[filename2]
[error id]</programlisting>
<para>The <literal>error id</literal> is the id that you want to suppress.
The easiest way to get it is to use the <literal>--xml</literal> command
line flag. Copy and paste the <literal>id</literal> string from the xml
output.</para>
<para>Here is an example:</para>
<programlisting>memleak:file1.cpp
exceptNew:file1.cpp
uninitvar</programlisting>
<para>You can then use the suppressions file:</para>
<programlisting>cppcheck --suppressions suppressions.txt src/</programlisting>
<para></para>
</chapter>
<chapter>
<title>Leaks</title>
<para>Looking for memory leaks and resource leaks is a key feature of
Cppcheck. Cppcheck can detect many common mistakes by default. But through
some tweaking you can both increase the capabilities and also reduce the
amount of false positives.</para>
<section>
<title>Automatic deallocation</title>
<para>A common cause of false positives is when there is automatic
deallocation. Here is an example:</para>
<programlisting>void Form1::foo()
{
QPushButton *pb = new QPushButton("OK", this);
}</programlisting>
<para>Cppcheck can't see where the deallocation is when you have such
code.</para>
<para>If you execute:</para>
<programlisting>cppcheck --all file1.cpp</programlisting>
<para>The result will be:</para>
<programlisting>[file1.cpp:4]: (possible error) Memory leak: pb</programlisting>
<para>The "possible" in the error message means that the message may be
a false positive.</para>
<para>To avoid such false positives, create a textfile and write the
names of the automaticly deallocated classes.</para>
<programlisting>QLabel
QPushButton</programlisting>
<para>Then execute cppcheck with the <literal>--auto-dealloc</literal>
option:</para>
<programlisting>cppcheck --auto-dealloc qt.lst file1.cpp</programlisting>
</section>
<section>
<title>Userdefined allocation/deallocation functions</title>
<para><literal>Cppcheck</literal> understands many common allocation and
deallocation functions. But not all.</para>
<para>Here is example code that might leak memory or resources:</para>
<para><programlisting>void foo(int x)
{
void *f = CreateFred();
if (x == 1)
return;
DestroyFred(f);
}</programlisting></para>
<para>If you analyse that with Cppcheck it won't find any leaks:</para>
<programlisting>cppcheck --all fred1.cpp</programlisting>
<para>You can add some custom leaks checking by providing simple
implementations for the allocation and deallocation functions. Write
this in a separate file:</para>
<programlisting>void *CreateFred()
{
return malloc(100);
}
void DestroyFred(void *p)
{
free(p);
}</programlisting>
<para>When Cppcheck see this it understands that CreateFred will return
allocated memory and that DestroyFred will deallocate memory.</para>
<para>Now, execute <literal>Cppcheck</literal> this way:</para>
<programlisting>cppcheck --append=fred.cpp fred1.cpp</programlisting>
<para>The output from cppcheck is:</para>
<programlisting>Checking fred1.cpp...
[fred1.cpp:5]: (error) Memory leak: f</programlisting>
</section>
</chapter>
<chapter>
<title>Exception safety</title>
<para>Cppcheck has a few checks that ensure that you don't break the basic
guarantee of exception safety. We don't have any checks for the strong
guarantee yet.</para>
<para>Example:</para>
<programlisting>Fred::Fred() : a(new int[20]), b(new int[20])
{
}</programlisting>
<para>By default cppcheck will not detect any problems in that
code.</para>
<para>To enable the exception safety checking you can use
<literal>--enable</literal>:</para>
<programlisting>cppcheck --enable fred.cpp</programlisting>
<para>The output will be:</para>
<programlisting>[fred.cpp:3]: (style) Upon exception there is memory leak: a</programlisting>
<para>If an exception occurs when <literal>b</literal> is allocated,
<literal>a</literal> will leak.</para>
<para></para>
</chapter>
</book>