Sebastian b78d714037 posix.cfg: access(): Removed redundant configuration, added tests (#1048) ... I intentionally removed the second access() configuraion because it was missing the use-retval attribute. But calling access() without using the return value is absolutely senseless. I added tests to posix.c to verify the correct configuration of access().		2018-01-22 14:54:14 +01:00
..
gnu.c	Merge simplecpp branch	2016-07-20 12:21:00 +02:00
posix.c	posix.cfg: access(): Removed redundant configuration, added tests (#1048)	2018-01-22 14:54:14 +01:00
qt.cpp	Fixed #8076 (unmatched suppression when calling ./runtests.sh (test/cfg))	2018-01-10 15:52:06 +01:00
runtests.sh	Fixed #8076 (unmatched suppression when calling ./runtests.sh (test/cfg))	2018-01-10 15:52:06 +01:00
std.c	Fixed #8076 (unmatched suppression when calling ./runtests.sh (test/cfg))	2018-01-10 15:52:06 +01:00
std.cpp	Fixed #8076 (unmatched suppression when calling ./runtests.sh (test/cfg))	2018-01-10 15:52:06 +01:00