68504a0f51 | ||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
README.md | ||
bisect.sh | ||
bisect_common.py | ||
bisect_hang.py | ||
bisect_res.py |
README.md
Bisecting
bisect.sh
is a script to bisect regressions in Cppcheck utilizing git-bisect
.
To learn more about bisecting please refer to https://git-scm.com/docs/git-bisect.
Command
./bisect.sh <hash-good> <hash-bad> "<cppcheck-options>" "[expected]"
hash-good
the latest known good commit hash or tag
hash-bad
the earliest known bad commit hash or tag
cppcheck-options
the options for the Cppcheck invokatio
expected
(optional) a string that is expected in the output. Will be used instead of the exitcode
If possible use main
as the function to test stuff with since it won't emit an unusedFunction
warning.
Bisecting result regressions
Results regressions are being bisected based on the --error-exitcode=
result.
If nothing is found the result will be 0
and it is treated as a good commit.
If a finding occurs the result will be 1
which is treated as a bad commit.
If a crash occurs it is treated as a bad commit.
You can also bisect based on expected output via the expected
parameter.
If the given string is found in the output it is treated as a good commit.
If the given string is not found in the output it is treated as a bad commit.
If a crash occurs it is treated as a bad commit.
False positive
Provide a code sample which will trigger a single(!) false postive only. Trying to bisect multiple issues at the same time will most likely result in an incorrect result (see below).
// cppcheck-suppress unusedFunction
static void f()
{
<code triggering FP>
}
./bisect.sh <hash-good> <hash-bad> "<cppcheck-options>"
After the bisecting check the output to make sure that only expected false positive and no additional finding was reported for the bad commits. Any other finding will also cause the commit to be marked as bad leading to an incorrect result.
False negative
Via suppression
Provide a code sample which will trigger a unmatchedSuppression
.
// cppcheck-suppress unusedFunction
static void f()
{
// cppcheck-suppress unreadVariable
int i;
}
./bisect.sh <hash-good> <hash-bad> "<cppcheck-options>"
Via output
static void f()
{
int i;
}
Provide the expected error ID (unreadVariable
) as the expected
parameter.
./bisect.sh <hash-good> <hash-bad> "<cppcheck-options>" "unreadVariable"
Bisecting scan time regressions
We use daca@home to track differences in scan time. An overview of regressions in scan time can be found at http://cppcheck1.osuosl.org:8000/time_gt.html.
You need to download the archive as specified by the second line in the output and extract it.
If the overall scan time regressed you need to specify the whole folder.
If a timeout (potential hang) was introduced you can simply specify the file from error: Internal error: Child process crashed with signal 15 [cppcheckError]
.
Notes
Bisecting daca@home issues
Use the following data as respective parameters:
hash-good
the latest tagged release - the second value from the cppcheck:
line
hash-bad
the commit hash from the head-info:
line
cppcheck-options
the cppcheck-options:
line and the path to the folder/file to scan
Known compilation issues:
- 2.5 and before can only be built with GCC<=10 because of missing includes caused by cleanups within the standard headers. You need to specify
CXX=g++-10
. - 1.88 and 1.89 cannot be compiled:
make: python: No such file or directory
RESOLVED: a hot-patch is applied before compilation.
- 1.39 to 1.49 (possibly more versions - 1.54 and up work) cannot be compiled:
lib/mathlib.cpp:70:42: error: invalid conversion from ‘char’ to ‘char**’ [-fpermissive]
70 | return std::strtoul(str.c_str(), '\0', 16);
| ^~~~
| |
| char
- some commits between 2.0 and 2.2 cannot be compiled:
cli/cppcheckexecutor.cpp:333:22: error: size of array ‘mytstack’ is not an integral constant-expression
333 | static char mytstack[MYSTACKSIZE]= {0}; // alternative stack for signal handler
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
RESOLVED: a hot-patch is applied before compilation.
- some commits between 1.54 and 1.55 cannot be compiled:
lib/preprocessor.cpp:2103:5: error: ‘errorLogger’ was not declared in this scope; did you mean ‘_errorLogger’?
2103 | errorLogger->reportInfo(errmsg);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
| _errorLogger