This reverts commit a5a384c5ff.
I don't remember what I had in mind for "We will use this property later.", but
the change was wrong. If a font pattern doesn't have any value for element,
it must be interpretted as "it matches any value perfectly. And "perfectly"
must have a score of 0 for that to happen.
This was actually affecting bitmap fonts (in a bad way), as the change made
an outline font to always be preferred over a (otherwise equal) bitmap font,
even for the exact size of the bitmap font. That probably was never noticed
by anyone, but with the font range support this has become clear (and worked
around by Akira). To clean that up, I'm reverting this so I can land the
rest of patches for bug 80873.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80873#c10
Previously, if the patten didn't request, eg, style, then the style
and stylelang were fully copied from the font, even though the pattern
had a stylelang. Eg:
$ fc-match 'Apple Color Emoji:stylelang=en'
Apple Color Emoji.ttf: "Apple Color Emoji" "標準體"
This change both fixes that and makes the code much more readable. Now:
$ fc-match 'Apple Color Emoji:stylelang=en'
Apple Color Emoji.ttf: "Apple Color Emoji" "Regular"
iconv support was turned off by default in f30a5d76.
Some fonts, like Apple Color Emoji, only have their English
name in a MacRoman entry. As such, decode MacRoman ourselves.
Previous format was unusable. New format is ranges of hex values.
To choose space character and Latin capital letters for example:
$ fc-pattern ':charset=20 41-5a'
Pattern has 1 elts (size 16)
charset:
0000: 00000000 00000001 07fffffe 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
(s)
It was added without proper measurement and a fuzzy possible
use-case (font servers) in mind, but reality check shows that
this significantly slows down caching. As such, deprecate it
and do NOT compute hash during caching.
Makes caching two to three times faster (ignoring the 2 second
delay in fc-cache).
This is more robust but introduces a small change in behavior:
For .pcf.gz fonts, the new code calculates the hash of the uncompressed
font data whereas the original code was calculating the hash of the
compressed data.
No big deal IMO.
Akira TAGOH
Behdad Esfahbod