2008-01-24 09:11:09 +01:00
|
|
|
/*
|
2011-04-21 23:14:28 +02:00
|
|
|
* Copyright © 2007,2008,2009 Red Hat, Inc.
|
2013-10-17 21:01:57 +02:00
|
|
|
* Copyright © 2012,2013 Google, Inc.
|
2008-01-24 09:11:09 +01:00
|
|
|
*
|
2010-04-22 06:11:43 +02:00
|
|
|
* This is part of HarfBuzz, a text shaping library.
|
2008-01-24 09:11:09 +01:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Permission is hereby granted, without written agreement and without
|
|
|
|
* license or royalty fees, to use, copy, modify, and distribute this
|
|
|
|
* software and its documentation for any purpose, provided that the
|
|
|
|
* above copyright notice and the following two paragraphs appear in
|
|
|
|
* all copies of this software.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER BE LIABLE TO ANY PARTY FOR
|
|
|
|
* DIRECT, INDIRECT, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES
|
|
|
|
* ARISING OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE AND ITS DOCUMENTATION, EVEN
|
|
|
|
* IF THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
|
|
|
|
* DAMAGE.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS ANY WARRANTIES, INCLUDING,
|
|
|
|
* BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND
|
|
|
|
* FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. THE SOFTWARE PROVIDED HEREUNDER IS
|
|
|
|
* ON AN "AS IS" BASIS, AND THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER HAS NO OBLIGATION TO
|
|
|
|
* PROVIDE MAINTENANCE, SUPPORT, UPDATES, ENHANCEMENTS, OR MODIFICATIONS.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Red Hat Author(s): Behdad Esfahbod
|
2012-07-30 08:38:39 +02:00
|
|
|
* Google Author(s): Behdad Esfahbod
|
2008-01-24 09:11:09 +01:00
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
2010-06-09 12:32:56 +02:00
|
|
|
#ifndef HB_OT_LAYOUT_PRIVATE_HH
|
|
|
|
#define HB_OT_LAYOUT_PRIVATE_HH
|
2008-01-24 09:11:09 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2011-04-21 00:50:27 +02:00
|
|
|
#include "hb-private.hh"
|
2009-08-02 21:20:22 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2008-01-24 09:11:09 +01:00
|
|
|
#include "hb-ot-layout.h"
|
2009-08-02 21:20:22 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2011-04-21 00:50:27 +02:00
|
|
|
#include "hb-font-private.hh"
|
2010-05-13 00:23:21 +02:00
|
|
|
#include "hb-buffer-private.hh"
|
2012-08-02 03:46:36 +02:00
|
|
|
#include "hb-set-private.hh"
|
2008-01-24 09:11:09 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2009-08-04 03:40:20 +02:00
|
|
|
|
[OTLayout] Ignore default-ignorables when matching GSUB/GPOS
When matching lookups, be smart about default-ignorable characters.
In particular:
Do nothing specific about ZWNJ, but for the other default-ignorables:
If the lookup in question uses the ignorable character in a sequence,
then match it as we used to do. However, if the sequence match will
fail because the default-ignorable blocked it, try skipping the
ignorable character and continue.
The most immediate thing it means is that if Lam-Alef forms a ligature,
then Lam-ZWJ-Alef will do to. Finally!
One exception: when matching for GPOS, or for backtrack/lookahead of
GSUB, we ignore ZWNJ too. That's the right thing to do.
It certainly is possible to build fonts that this feature will result
in undesirable glyphs, but it's hard to think of a real-world case
that that would happen.
This *does* break Indic shaping right now, since Indic Unicode has
specific rules for what ZWJ/ZWNJ mean, and skipping ZWJ is breaking
those rules. That will be fixed in upcoming commits.
2013-02-14 13:43:13 +01:00
|
|
|
/* buffer var allocations, used during the entire shaping process */
|
|
|
|
#define unicode_props0() var2.u8[0]
|
|
|
|
#define unicode_props1() var2.u8[1]
|
|
|
|
|
2013-10-17 21:01:57 +02:00
|
|
|
/* buffer var allocations, used during the GSUB/GPOS processing */
|
|
|
|
#define glyph_props() var1.u16[0] /* GDEF glyph properties */
|
|
|
|
#define lig_props() var1.u8[2] /* GSUB/GPOS ligature tracking */
|
|
|
|
#define syllable() var1.u8[3] /* GSUB/GPOS shaping boundaries */
|
|
|
|
|
[OTLayout] Ignore default-ignorables when matching GSUB/GPOS
When matching lookups, be smart about default-ignorable characters.
In particular:
Do nothing specific about ZWNJ, but for the other default-ignorables:
If the lookup in question uses the ignorable character in a sequence,
then match it as we used to do. However, if the sequence match will
fail because the default-ignorable blocked it, try skipping the
ignorable character and continue.
The most immediate thing it means is that if Lam-Alef forms a ligature,
then Lam-ZWJ-Alef will do to. Finally!
One exception: when matching for GPOS, or for backtrack/lookahead of
GSUB, we ignore ZWNJ too. That's the right thing to do.
It certainly is possible to build fonts that this feature will result
in undesirable glyphs, but it's hard to think of a real-world case
that that would happen.
This *does* break Indic shaping right now, since Indic Unicode has
specific rules for what ZWJ/ZWNJ mean, and skipping ZWJ is breaking
those rules. That will be fixed in upcoming commits.
2013-02-14 13:43:13 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2013-10-16 13:42:18 +02:00
|
|
|
enum {
|
2013-10-17 20:57:57 +02:00
|
|
|
MASK0_ZWJ = 0x20u,
|
|
|
|
MASK0_ZWNJ = 0x40u,
|
|
|
|
MASK0_IGNORABLE = 0x80u,
|
|
|
|
MASK0_GEN_CAT = 0x1Fu
|
2013-10-16 13:42:18 +02:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
[OTLayout] Ignore default-ignorables when matching GSUB/GPOS
When matching lookups, be smart about default-ignorable characters.
In particular:
Do nothing specific about ZWNJ, but for the other default-ignorables:
If the lookup in question uses the ignorable character in a sequence,
then match it as we used to do. However, if the sequence match will
fail because the default-ignorable blocked it, try skipping the
ignorable character and continue.
The most immediate thing it means is that if Lam-Alef forms a ligature,
then Lam-ZWJ-Alef will do to. Finally!
One exception: when matching for GPOS, or for backtrack/lookahead of
GSUB, we ignore ZWNJ too. That's the right thing to do.
It certainly is possible to build fonts that this feature will result
in undesirable glyphs, but it's hard to think of a real-world case
that that would happen.
This *does* break Indic shaping right now, since Indic Unicode has
specific rules for what ZWJ/ZWNJ mean, and skipping ZWJ is breaking
those rules. That will be fixed in upcoming commits.
2013-02-14 13:43:13 +01:00
|
|
|
inline void
|
|
|
|
_hb_glyph_info_set_unicode_props (hb_glyph_info_t *info, hb_unicode_funcs_t *unicode)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
info->unicode_props0() = ((unsigned int) unicode->general_category (info->codepoint)) |
|
2013-10-16 13:42:18 +02:00
|
|
|
(unicode->is_default_ignorable (info->codepoint) ? MASK0_IGNORABLE : 0) |
|
|
|
|
(info->codepoint == 0x200C ? MASK0_ZWNJ : 0) |
|
|
|
|
(info->codepoint == 0x200D ? MASK0_ZWJ : 0);
|
[OTLayout] Ignore default-ignorables when matching GSUB/GPOS
When matching lookups, be smart about default-ignorable characters.
In particular:
Do nothing specific about ZWNJ, but for the other default-ignorables:
If the lookup in question uses the ignorable character in a sequence,
then match it as we used to do. However, if the sequence match will
fail because the default-ignorable blocked it, try skipping the
ignorable character and continue.
The most immediate thing it means is that if Lam-Alef forms a ligature,
then Lam-ZWJ-Alef will do to. Finally!
One exception: when matching for GPOS, or for backtrack/lookahead of
GSUB, we ignore ZWNJ too. That's the right thing to do.
It certainly is possible to build fonts that this feature will result
in undesirable glyphs, but it's hard to think of a real-world case
that that would happen.
This *does* break Indic shaping right now, since Indic Unicode has
specific rules for what ZWJ/ZWNJ mean, and skipping ZWJ is breaking
those rules. That will be fixed in upcoming commits.
2013-02-14 13:43:13 +01:00
|
|
|
info->unicode_props1() = unicode->modified_combining_class (info->codepoint);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-27 20:48:34 +02:00
|
|
|
inline void
|
|
|
|
_hb_glyph_info_set_general_category (hb_glyph_info_t *info, hb_unicode_general_category_t gen_cat)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2013-10-16 13:42:18 +02:00
|
|
|
info->unicode_props0() = (unsigned int) gen_cat | ((info->unicode_props0()) & ~MASK0_GEN_CAT);
|
2013-05-27 20:48:34 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
[OTLayout] Ignore default-ignorables when matching GSUB/GPOS
When matching lookups, be smart about default-ignorable characters.
In particular:
Do nothing specific about ZWNJ, but for the other default-ignorables:
If the lookup in question uses the ignorable character in a sequence,
then match it as we used to do. However, if the sequence match will
fail because the default-ignorable blocked it, try skipping the
ignorable character and continue.
The most immediate thing it means is that if Lam-Alef forms a ligature,
then Lam-ZWJ-Alef will do to. Finally!
One exception: when matching for GPOS, or for backtrack/lookahead of
GSUB, we ignore ZWNJ too. That's the right thing to do.
It certainly is possible to build fonts that this feature will result
in undesirable glyphs, but it's hard to think of a real-world case
that that would happen.
This *does* break Indic shaping right now, since Indic Unicode has
specific rules for what ZWJ/ZWNJ mean, and skipping ZWJ is breaking
those rules. That will be fixed in upcoming commits.
2013-02-14 13:43:13 +01:00
|
|
|
inline hb_unicode_general_category_t
|
|
|
|
_hb_glyph_info_get_general_category (const hb_glyph_info_t *info)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2013-10-16 13:42:18 +02:00
|
|
|
return (hb_unicode_general_category_t) (info->unicode_props0() & MASK0_GEN_CAT);
|
[OTLayout] Ignore default-ignorables when matching GSUB/GPOS
When matching lookups, be smart about default-ignorable characters.
In particular:
Do nothing specific about ZWNJ, but for the other default-ignorables:
If the lookup in question uses the ignorable character in a sequence,
then match it as we used to do. However, if the sequence match will
fail because the default-ignorable blocked it, try skipping the
ignorable character and continue.
The most immediate thing it means is that if Lam-Alef forms a ligature,
then Lam-ZWJ-Alef will do to. Finally!
One exception: when matching for GPOS, or for backtrack/lookahead of
GSUB, we ignore ZWNJ too. That's the right thing to do.
It certainly is possible to build fonts that this feature will result
in undesirable glyphs, but it's hard to think of a real-world case
that that would happen.
This *does* break Indic shaping right now, since Indic Unicode has
specific rules for what ZWJ/ZWNJ mean, and skipping ZWJ is breaking
those rules. That will be fixed in upcoming commits.
2013-02-14 13:43:13 +01:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
inline void
|
|
|
|
_hb_glyph_info_set_modified_combining_class (hb_glyph_info_t *info, unsigned int modified_class)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
info->unicode_props1() = modified_class;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
inline unsigned int
|
|
|
|
_hb_glyph_info_get_modified_combining_class (const hb_glyph_info_t *info)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return info->unicode_props1();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
inline hb_bool_t
|
|
|
|
_hb_glyph_info_is_default_ignorable (const hb_glyph_info_t *info)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2013-10-16 13:42:18 +02:00
|
|
|
return !!(info->unicode_props0() & MASK0_IGNORABLE);
|
[OTLayout] Ignore default-ignorables when matching GSUB/GPOS
When matching lookups, be smart about default-ignorable characters.
In particular:
Do nothing specific about ZWNJ, but for the other default-ignorables:
If the lookup in question uses the ignorable character in a sequence,
then match it as we used to do. However, if the sequence match will
fail because the default-ignorable blocked it, try skipping the
ignorable character and continue.
The most immediate thing it means is that if Lam-Alef forms a ligature,
then Lam-ZWJ-Alef will do to. Finally!
One exception: when matching for GPOS, or for backtrack/lookahead of
GSUB, we ignore ZWNJ too. That's the right thing to do.
It certainly is possible to build fonts that this feature will result
in undesirable glyphs, but it's hard to think of a real-world case
that that would happen.
This *does* break Indic shaping right now, since Indic Unicode has
specific rules for what ZWJ/ZWNJ mean, and skipping ZWJ is breaking
those rules. That will be fixed in upcoming commits.
2013-02-14 13:43:13 +01:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
inline hb_bool_t
|
|
|
|
_hb_glyph_info_is_zwnj (const hb_glyph_info_t *info)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2013-10-16 13:42:18 +02:00
|
|
|
return !!(info->unicode_props0() & MASK0_ZWNJ);
|
[OTLayout] Ignore default-ignorables when matching GSUB/GPOS
When matching lookups, be smart about default-ignorable characters.
In particular:
Do nothing specific about ZWNJ, but for the other default-ignorables:
If the lookup in question uses the ignorable character in a sequence,
then match it as we used to do. However, if the sequence match will
fail because the default-ignorable blocked it, try skipping the
ignorable character and continue.
The most immediate thing it means is that if Lam-Alef forms a ligature,
then Lam-ZWJ-Alef will do to. Finally!
One exception: when matching for GPOS, or for backtrack/lookahead of
GSUB, we ignore ZWNJ too. That's the right thing to do.
It certainly is possible to build fonts that this feature will result
in undesirable glyphs, but it's hard to think of a real-world case
that that would happen.
This *does* break Indic shaping right now, since Indic Unicode has
specific rules for what ZWJ/ZWNJ mean, and skipping ZWJ is breaking
those rules. That will be fixed in upcoming commits.
2013-02-14 13:43:13 +01:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-02-14 16:46:52 +01:00
|
|
|
inline hb_bool_t
|
|
|
|
_hb_glyph_info_is_zwj (const hb_glyph_info_t *info)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2013-10-16 13:42:18 +02:00
|
|
|
return !!(info->unicode_props0() & MASK0_ZWJ);
|
2013-02-14 16:46:52 +01:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-10-16 13:42:38 +02:00
|
|
|
inline void
|
|
|
|
_hb_glyph_info_flip_joiners (hb_glyph_info_t *info)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
info->unicode_props0() ^= MASK0_ZWNJ | MASK0_ZWJ;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
[OTLayout] Ignore default-ignorables when matching GSUB/GPOS
When matching lookups, be smart about default-ignorable characters.
In particular:
Do nothing specific about ZWNJ, but for the other default-ignorables:
If the lookup in question uses the ignorable character in a sequence,
then match it as we used to do. However, if the sequence match will
fail because the default-ignorable blocked it, try skipping the
ignorable character and continue.
The most immediate thing it means is that if Lam-Alef forms a ligature,
then Lam-ZWJ-Alef will do to. Finally!
One exception: when matching for GPOS, or for backtrack/lookahead of
GSUB, we ignore ZWNJ too. That's the right thing to do.
It certainly is possible to build fonts that this feature will result
in undesirable glyphs, but it's hard to think of a real-world case
that that would happen.
This *does* break Indic shaping right now, since Indic Unicode has
specific rules for what ZWJ/ZWNJ mean, and skipping ZWJ is breaking
those rules. That will be fixed in upcoming commits.
2013-02-14 13:43:13 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2011-05-03 06:35:53 +02:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* GDEF
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
2012-11-16 22:34:29 +01:00
|
|
|
typedef enum {
|
2013-10-17 20:55:34 +02:00
|
|
|
/* One bit available here... = 0x01u */
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* The following three match LookupFlags::Ignore* numbers. */
|
2013-10-17 20:47:33 +02:00
|
|
|
HB_OT_LAYOUT_GLYPH_PROPS_BASE_GLYPH = 0x02u,
|
|
|
|
HB_OT_LAYOUT_GLYPH_PROPS_LIGATURE = 0x04u,
|
2013-10-17 20:55:34 +02:00
|
|
|
HB_OT_LAYOUT_GLYPH_PROPS_MARK = 0x08u
|
|
|
|
|
2012-11-16 22:34:29 +01:00
|
|
|
} hb_ot_layout_glyph_class_mask_t;
|
|
|
|
|
2008-01-24 09:54:09 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2012-07-24 02:14:13 +02:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* GSUB/GPOS
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
2012-07-26 00:37:51 +02:00
|
|
|
/* lig_id / lig_comp
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* When a ligature is formed:
|
|
|
|
*
|
2012-07-29 03:05:25 +02:00
|
|
|
* - The ligature glyph and any marks in between all the same newly allocated
|
|
|
|
* lig_id,
|
2012-07-30 06:42:07 +02:00
|
|
|
* - The ligature glyph will get lig_num_comps set to the number of components
|
2012-07-26 00:37:51 +02:00
|
|
|
* - The marks get lig_comp > 0, reflecting which component of the ligature
|
|
|
|
* they were applied to.
|
|
|
|
* - This is used in GPOS to attach marks to the right component of a ligature
|
|
|
|
* in MarkLigPos.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* When a multiple-substitution is done:
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* - All resulting glyphs will have lig_id = 0,
|
|
|
|
* - The resulting glyphs will have lig_comp = 0, 1, 2, ... respectively.
|
2012-07-29 03:05:25 +02:00
|
|
|
* - This is used in GPOS to attach marks to the first component of a
|
2012-07-26 00:37:51 +02:00
|
|
|
* multiple substitution in MarkBasePos.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* The numbers are also used in GPOS to do mark-to-mark positioning only
|
|
|
|
* to marks that belong to the same component of a ligature in MarkMarPos.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2012-07-30 06:42:07 +02:00
|
|
|
#define IS_LIG_BASE 0x10
|
2012-07-24 02:14:13 +02:00
|
|
|
static inline void
|
2012-07-30 04:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
set_lig_props_for_ligature (hb_glyph_info_t &info, unsigned int lig_id, unsigned int lig_num_comps)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2012-07-30 06:42:07 +02:00
|
|
|
info.lig_props() = (lig_id << 5) | IS_LIG_BASE | (lig_num_comps & 0x0F);
|
2012-07-30 04:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static inline void
|
|
|
|
set_lig_props_for_mark (hb_glyph_info_t &info, unsigned int lig_id, unsigned int lig_comp)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
info.lig_props() = (lig_id << 5) | (lig_comp & 0x0F);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static inline void
|
|
|
|
set_lig_props_for_component (hb_glyph_info_t &info, unsigned int comp)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
set_lig_props_for_mark (info, 0, comp);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2012-07-24 02:14:13 +02:00
|
|
|
static inline unsigned int
|
|
|
|
get_lig_id (const hb_glyph_info_t &info)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2012-07-30 04:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
return info.lig_props() >> 5;
|
2012-07-24 02:14:13 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
2012-07-30 06:42:07 +02:00
|
|
|
static inline bool
|
|
|
|
is_a_ligature (const hb_glyph_info_t &info)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return !!(info.lig_props() & IS_LIG_BASE);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2012-07-24 02:14:13 +02:00
|
|
|
static inline unsigned int
|
|
|
|
get_lig_comp (const hb_glyph_info_t &info)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2012-07-30 06:42:07 +02:00
|
|
|
if (is_a_ligature (info))
|
2012-07-30 04:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
return info.lig_props() & 0x0F;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static inline unsigned int
|
|
|
|
get_lig_num_comps (const hb_glyph_info_t &info)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2012-11-16 22:34:29 +01:00
|
|
|
if ((info.glyph_props() & HB_OT_LAYOUT_GLYPH_PROPS_LIGATURE) && is_a_ligature (info))
|
2012-07-30 04:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
return info.lig_props() & 0x0F;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
return 1;
|
2012-07-24 02:14:13 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static inline uint8_t allocate_lig_id (hb_buffer_t *buffer) {
|
2012-07-30 04:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
uint8_t lig_id = buffer->next_serial () & 0x07;
|
2012-07-24 02:14:13 +02:00
|
|
|
if (unlikely (!lig_id))
|
|
|
|
lig_id = allocate_lig_id (buffer); /* in case of overflow */
|
|
|
|
return lig_id;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-07-30 08:38:39 +02:00
|
|
|
HB_INTERNAL hb_bool_t
|
2012-11-15 23:57:31 +01:00
|
|
|
hb_ot_layout_lookup_would_substitute_fast (hb_face_t *face,
|
2012-08-23 22:22:28 +02:00
|
|
|
unsigned int lookup_index,
|
2012-07-30 08:38:39 +02:00
|
|
|
const hb_codepoint_t *glyphs,
|
|
|
|
unsigned int glyphs_length,
|
2012-08-23 22:22:28 +02:00
|
|
|
hb_bool_t zero_context);
|
2012-07-30 08:38:39 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2012-08-02 14:11:14 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Should be called before all the substitute_lookup's are done. */
|
|
|
|
HB_INTERNAL void
|
2012-08-02 14:36:40 +02:00
|
|
|
hb_ot_layout_substitute_start (hb_font_t *font,
|
2012-08-02 14:11:14 +02:00
|
|
|
hb_buffer_t *buffer);
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-03 00:52:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct hb_ot_layout_lookup_accelerator_t;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
namespace OT {
|
|
|
|
struct hb_apply_context_t;
|
|
|
|
struct SubstLookup;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HB_INTERNAL void
|
|
|
|
hb_ot_layout_substitute_lookup (OT::hb_apply_context_t *c,
|
|
|
|
const OT::SubstLookup &lookup,
|
|
|
|
const hb_ot_layout_lookup_accelerator_t &accel);
|
|
|
|
|
2012-08-02 14:11:14 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Should be called after all the substitute_lookup's are done */
|
|
|
|
HB_INTERNAL void
|
2012-08-02 14:36:40 +02:00
|
|
|
hb_ot_layout_substitute_finish (hb_font_t *font,
|
2012-08-02 14:11:14 +02:00
|
|
|
hb_buffer_t *buffer);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Should be called before all the position_lookup's are done. Resets positions to zero. */
|
|
|
|
HB_INTERNAL void
|
|
|
|
hb_ot_layout_position_start (hb_font_t *font,
|
|
|
|
hb_buffer_t *buffer);
|
2012-07-30 08:38:39 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2012-08-02 14:11:14 +02:00
|
|
|
/* Should be called after all the position_lookup's are done */
|
|
|
|
HB_INTERNAL void
|
|
|
|
hb_ot_layout_position_finish (hb_font_t *font,
|
Adjust mark advance-width zeroing logic for Myanmar
Before, we were zeroing advance width of attached marks for
non-Indic scripts, and not doing it for Indic.
We have now three different behaviors, which seem to better
reflect what Uniscribe is doing:
- For Indic, no explicit zeroing happens whatsoever, which
is the same as before,
- For Myanmar, zero advance width of glyphs marked as marks
*in GDEF*, and do that *before* applying GPOS. This seems
to be what the new Win8 Myanmar shaper does,
- For everything else, zero advance width of glyphs that are
from General_Category=Mn Unicode characters, and do so
before applying GPOS. This seems to be what Uniscribe does
for Latin at least.
With these changes, positioning of all tests matches for Myanmar,
except for the glitch in Uniscribe not applying 'mark'. See preivous
commit.
2013-02-12 15:44:57 +01:00
|
|
|
hb_buffer_t *buffer);
|
2012-08-02 14:11:14 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2012-07-30 08:38:39 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-08-02 23:41:36 +02:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* hb_ot_layout_t
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
2012-08-28 23:57:49 +02:00
|
|
|
namespace OT {
|
|
|
|
struct GDEF;
|
|
|
|
struct GSUB;
|
|
|
|
struct GPOS;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-03 00:06:51 +02:00
|
|
|
struct hb_ot_layout_lookup_accelerator_t
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
template <typename TLookup>
|
|
|
|
inline void init (const TLookup &lookup)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
digest.init ();
|
|
|
|
lookup.add_coverage (&digest);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
template <typename TLookup>
|
|
|
|
inline void fini (const TLookup &lookup)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hb_set_digest_t digest;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2010-05-19 21:45:06 +02:00
|
|
|
struct hb_ot_layout_t
|
2009-05-20 05:58:54 +02:00
|
|
|
{
|
2009-08-04 04:01:47 +02:00
|
|
|
hb_blob_t *gdef_blob;
|
|
|
|
hb_blob_t *gsub_blob;
|
|
|
|
hb_blob_t *gpos_blob;
|
|
|
|
|
2012-08-28 23:57:49 +02:00
|
|
|
const struct OT::GDEF *gdef;
|
|
|
|
const struct OT::GSUB *gsub;
|
|
|
|
const struct OT::GPOS *gpos;
|
2012-08-02 03:46:36 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2012-08-02 10:00:31 +02:00
|
|
|
unsigned int gsub_lookup_count;
|
|
|
|
unsigned int gpos_lookup_count;
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-03 00:06:51 +02:00
|
|
|
hb_ot_layout_lookup_accelerator_t *gsub_accels;
|
|
|
|
hb_ot_layout_lookup_accelerator_t *gpos_accels;
|
2009-08-02 23:41:36 +02:00
|
|
|
};
|
2009-05-18 23:09:33 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2009-05-16 00:54:53 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-05-19 21:45:06 +02:00
|
|
|
HB_INTERNAL hb_ot_layout_t *
|
2011-05-03 06:35:53 +02:00
|
|
|
_hb_ot_layout_create (hb_face_t *face);
|
2009-08-04 03:40:20 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-05-13 05:22:55 +02:00
|
|
|
HB_INTERNAL void
|
2011-05-03 06:35:53 +02:00
|
|
|
_hb_ot_layout_destroy (hb_ot_layout_t *layout);
|
2009-05-26 23:31:56 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-07-23 21:11:18 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2013-10-17 21:01:57 +02:00
|
|
|
#define hb_ot_layout_from_face(face) ((hb_ot_layout_t *) face->shaper_data.ot)
|
|
|
|
|
2008-01-24 09:11:09 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2010-06-09 12:32:56 +02:00
|
|
|
#endif /* HB_OT_LAYOUT_PRIVATE_HH */
|