In Coverage::iter_t, assume iterators are from same Coverage object

No need to support otherwise.
This commit is contained in:
Behdad Esfahbod 2022-05-18 15:14:32 -06:00
parent 27141735c3
commit 14b18725f0
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -1470,7 +1470,7 @@ struct CoverageFormat1
void next () { i++; }
hb_codepoint_t get_glyph () const { return c->glyphArray[i]; }
bool operator != (const iter_t& o) const
{ return i != o.i || c != o.c; }
{ return i != o.i; }
iter_t __end__ () const { iter_t it; it.init (*c); it.i = c->glyphArray.len; return it; }
private:
@ -1640,7 +1640,7 @@ struct CoverageFormat2
}
hb_codepoint_t get_glyph () const { return j; }
bool operator != (const iter_t& o) const
{ return i != o.i || j != o.j || c != o.c; }
{ return i != o.i || j != o.j; }
iter_t __end__ () const
{
iter_t it;
@ -1831,7 +1831,7 @@ struct Coverage
}
bool operator != (const iter_t& o) const
{
if (format != o.format) return true;
if (unlikely (format != o.format)) return true;
switch (format)
{
case 1: return u.format1 != o.u.format1;