From 2841436926d6a406bd1f4a35c66a0e3c2fdbeca7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Behdad Esfahbod <behdad@behdad.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 12:20:36 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Don't zero glyph advances in MarkToBase and similar lookups

See email thread "Should MarkToBase attachment zero the mark advance?"
started by Jonathan Kew on 23 August 2010 for details.
---
 src/hb-ot-layout-gpos-private.hh | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/hb-ot-layout-gpos-private.hh b/src/hb-ot-layout-gpos-private.hh
index a5f65b482..4969997c8 100644
--- a/src/hb-ot-layout-gpos-private.hh
+++ b/src/hb-ot-layout-gpos-private.hh
@@ -402,8 +402,6 @@ struct MarkArray : ArrayOf<MarkRecord>	/* Array of MarkRecords--in Coverage orde
     glyph_anchor.get_anchor (c->layout, c->buffer->info[glyph_pos].codepoint, &base_x, &base_y);
 
     hb_internal_glyph_position_t &o = c->buffer->pos[c->buffer->i];
-    o.x_advance = 0;
-    o.y_advance = 0;
     o.x_offset  = base_x - mark_x;
     o.y_offset  = base_y - mark_y;
     o.back      = c->buffer->i - glyph_pos;