[HB] Bitfield packing *is* very delicate

Fix the second instance.
This commit is contained in:
Behdad Esfahbod 2009-08-13 11:47:08 -04:00
parent ec90ee23b2
commit 2866d2974b
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ typedef struct _hb_glyph_position_t {
hb_position_t x_advance; hb_position_t x_advance;
hb_position_t y_advance; hb_position_t y_advance;
/* XXX these should all be replaced by "uint32_t internal" */ /* XXX these should all be replaced by "uint32_t internal" */
hb_bool_t new_advance :1; /* if set, the advance width values are unsigned short new_advance :1; /* if set, the advance width values are
absolute, i.e., they won't be absolute, i.e., they won't be
added to the original glyph's value added to the original glyph's value
but rather replace them */ but rather replace them */