[Indic] Optimize Indic table storage
This commit is contained in:
parent
c4a59de6d8
commit
4ec30aec30
|
@ -121,10 +121,12 @@ enum indic_matra_category_t {
|
||||||
INDIC_MATRA_CATEGORY_VISUAL_ORDER_LEFT = INDIC_MATRA_CATEGORY_NOT_APPLICABLE
|
INDIC_MATRA_CATEGORY_VISUAL_ORDER_LEFT = INDIC_MATRA_CATEGORY_NOT_APPLICABLE
|
||||||
};
|
};
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/* Note: We use ASSERT_STATIC_EXPR_ZERO() instead of ASSERT_STATIC_EXPR() and the comma operation
|
||||||
|
* because gcc fails to optimize the latter and fills the table in at runtime. */
|
||||||
#define INDIC_COMBINE_CATEGORIES(S,M) \
|
#define INDIC_COMBINE_CATEGORIES(S,M) \
|
||||||
(ASSERT_STATIC_EXPR (M == INDIC_MATRA_CATEGORY_NOT_APPLICABLE || (S == INDIC_SYLLABIC_CATEGORY_VIRAMA || S == INDIC_SYLLABIC_CATEGORY_VOWEL_DEPENDENT)), \
|
(ASSERT_STATIC_EXPR_ZERO (M == INDIC_MATRA_CATEGORY_NOT_APPLICABLE || (S == INDIC_SYLLABIC_CATEGORY_VIRAMA || S == INDIC_SYLLABIC_CATEGORY_VOWEL_DEPENDENT)) + \
|
||||||
ASSERT_STATIC_EXPR (S < 16 && M < 16), \
|
ASSERT_STATIC_EXPR_ZERO (S < 16 && M < 16) + \
|
||||||
(M << 4) | S)
|
((M << 4) | S))
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#include "hb-ot-shape-complex-indic-table.hh"
|
#include "hb-ot-shape-complex-indic-table.hh"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ HB_BEGIN_DECLS
|
||||||
#define ASSERT_STATIC(_cond) _ASSERT_STATIC0 (__LINE__, (_cond))
|
#define ASSERT_STATIC(_cond) _ASSERT_STATIC0 (__LINE__, (_cond))
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#define ASSERT_STATIC_EXPR(_cond) ((void) sizeof (char[(_cond) ? 1 : -1]))
|
#define ASSERT_STATIC_EXPR(_cond) ((void) sizeof (char[(_cond) ? 1 : -1]))
|
||||||
|
#define ASSERT_STATIC_EXPR_ZERO(_cond) (0 * sizeof (char[(_cond) ? 1 : -1]))
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/* Lets assert int types. Saves trouble down the road. */
|
/* Lets assert int types. Saves trouble down the road. */
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue