[HB] Fix context_length checking

This commit is contained in:
Behdad Esfahbod 2009-05-18 04:09:05 -04:00
parent d0ba055700
commit 7cff75babd
2 changed files with 14 additions and 11 deletions

View File

@ -79,13 +79,13 @@ static inline bool match_input (LOOKUP_ARGS_DEF,
unsigned int *context_length_out)
{
unsigned int i, j;
/* XXX context_length should also be checked when skipping glyphs, right?
* What does context_length really mean, anyway? */
unsigned int end = MIN (buffer->in_length, buffer->in_pos + context_length);
if (HB_UNLIKELY (buffer->in_pos + count > end))
return false;
for (i = 1, j = buffer->in_pos + 1; i < count; i++, j++) {
while (!_hb_ot_layout_check_glyph_property (layout, IN_ITEM (j), lookup_flag, &property)) {
if (HB_UNLIKELY (j + count - i == buffer->in_length))
if (HB_UNLIKELY (j + count - i == end))
return false;
j++;
}
@ -105,9 +105,10 @@ static inline bool match_backtrack (LOOKUP_ARGS_DEF,
match_func_t match_func,
char *match_data)
{
unsigned int i, j;
if (HB_UNLIKELY (buffer->out_pos < count))
return false;
for (i = 0, j = buffer->out_pos - 1; i < count; i++, j--) {
for (unsigned int i = 0, j = buffer->out_pos - 1; i < count; i++, j--) {
while (!_hb_ot_layout_check_glyph_property (layout, OUT_ITEM (j), lookup_flag, &property)) {
if (HB_UNLIKELY (j + 1 == count - i))
return false;
@ -129,10 +130,13 @@ static inline bool match_lookahead (LOOKUP_ARGS_DEF,
unsigned int offset)
{
unsigned int i, j;
unsigned int end = MIN (buffer->in_length, buffer->in_pos + context_length);
if (HB_UNLIKELY (buffer->in_pos + offset + count > end))
return false;
for (i = 0, j = buffer->in_pos + offset; i < count; i++, j++) {
while (!_hb_ot_layout_check_glyph_property (layout, OUT_ITEM (j), lookup_flag, &property)) {
if (HB_UNLIKELY (j + count - i == buffer->in_length))
if (HB_UNLIKELY (j + count - i == end))
return false;
j++;
}
@ -164,8 +168,8 @@ static inline bool apply_lookup (LOOKUP_ARGS_DEF,
const LookupRecord *record = lookupRecord;
/* XXX We have to jump non-matching glyphs when applying too, right? */
/* XXX We don't support lookupRecord arrays that are not increasing:
* Should be easy for in_place ones at least. */
/* TODO We don't support lookupRecord arrays that are not increasing:
* Should be easy for in_place ones at least. */
for (unsigned int i = 0; i < count;)
{
if (record_count && i == record->sequenceIndex)
@ -436,7 +440,6 @@ static inline bool chain_context_lookup (LOOKUP_ARGS_DEF,
inputCount, input,
context.funcs.match, context.match_data[1],
&offset) &&
(context_length -= offset, true) &&
match_lookahead (LOOKUP_ARGS,
lookaheadCount, lookahead,
context.funcs.match, context.match_data[2],

View File

@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
#define NO_INDEX ((unsigned int) 0xFFFF)
#define NO_CONTEXT ((unsigned int) -1)
#define NO_CONTEXT ((unsigned int) -0x20000)
#define NOT_COVERED ((unsigned int) -1)
#define MAX_NESTING_LEVEL 32