[ft] Remove (probably) stale comment
This commit is contained in:
parent
7003b601af
commit
d18c3c5861
|
@ -45,21 +45,16 @@
|
||||||
* In general, this file does a fine job of what it's supposed to do.
|
* In general, this file does a fine job of what it's supposed to do.
|
||||||
* There are, however, things that need more work:
|
* There are, however, things that need more work:
|
||||||
*
|
*
|
||||||
* - I remember seeing FT_Get_Advance() without the NO_HINTING flag to be buggy.
|
|
||||||
* Have not investigated.
|
|
||||||
*
|
|
||||||
* - FreeType works in 26.6 mode. Clients can decide to use that mode, and everything
|
* - FreeType works in 26.6 mode. Clients can decide to use that mode, and everything
|
||||||
* would work fine. However, we also abuse this API for performing in font-space,
|
* would work fine. However, we also abuse this API for performing in font-space,
|
||||||
* but don't pass the correct flags to FreeType. We just abuse the no-hinting mode
|
* but don't pass the correct flags to FreeType. We just abuse the no-hinting mode
|
||||||
* for that, such that no rounding etc happens. As such, we don't set ppem, and
|
* for that, such that no rounding etc happens. As such, we don't set ppem, and
|
||||||
* pass NO_HINTING as load_flags. Would be much better to use NO_SCALE, and scale
|
* pass NO_HINTING as load_flags. Would be much better to use NO_SCALE, and scale
|
||||||
* ourselves, like we do in uniscribe, etc.
|
* ourselves.
|
||||||
*
|
*
|
||||||
* - We don't handle / allow for emboldening / obliqueing.
|
* - We don't handle / allow for emboldening / obliqueing.
|
||||||
*
|
*
|
||||||
* - In the future, we should add constructors to create fonts in font space?
|
* - In the future, we should add constructors to create fonts in font space?
|
||||||
*
|
|
||||||
* - FT_Load_Glyph() is extremely costly. Do something about it?
|
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue