Fix awful confusion between lookup format and subtable format
As reported by John Daggett.
This commit is contained in:
parent
458ecbb60b
commit
fe9bc070e1
|
@ -1458,10 +1458,10 @@ struct PosLookupSubTable
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
inline bool sanitize (hb_sanitize_context_t *context) {
|
||||
inline bool sanitize (hb_sanitize_context_t *context, unsigned int lookup_type) {
|
||||
TRACE_SANITIZE ();
|
||||
if (!u.format.sanitize (context)) return false;
|
||||
switch (u.format) {
|
||||
if (!u.sub_format.sanitize (context)) return false;
|
||||
switch (lookup_type) {
|
||||
case Single: return u.single.sanitize (context);
|
||||
case Pair: return u.pair.sanitize (context);
|
||||
case Cursive: return u.cursive.sanitize (context);
|
||||
|
@ -1477,7 +1477,7 @@ struct PosLookupSubTable
|
|||
|
||||
private:
|
||||
union {
|
||||
USHORT format;
|
||||
USHORT sub_format;
|
||||
SinglePos single;
|
||||
PairPos pair;
|
||||
CursivePos cursive;
|
||||
|
@ -1489,7 +1489,7 @@ struct PosLookupSubTable
|
|||
ExtensionPos extension;
|
||||
} u;
|
||||
public:
|
||||
DEFINE_SIZE_UNION (2, format);
|
||||
DEFINE_SIZE_UNION (2, sub_format);
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1563,7 +1563,7 @@ struct PosLookup : Lookup
|
|||
TRACE_SANITIZE ();
|
||||
if (unlikely (!Lookup::sanitize (context))) return false;
|
||||
OffsetArrayOf<PosLookupSubTable> &list = CastR<OffsetArrayOf<PosLookupSubTable> > (subTable);
|
||||
return list.sanitize (context, this);
|
||||
return list.sanitize (context, this, get_type ());
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1611,7 +1611,7 @@ inline bool ExtensionPos::sanitize (hb_sanitize_context_t *context)
|
|||
if (unlikely (!Extension::sanitize (context))) return false;
|
||||
unsigned int offset = get_offset ();
|
||||
if (unlikely (!offset)) return true;
|
||||
return StructAtOffset<PosLookupSubTable> (this, offset).sanitize (context);
|
||||
return StructAtOffset<PosLookupSubTable> (this, offset).sanitize (context, get_type ());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline bool position_lookup (hb_apply_context_t *context, unsigned int lookup_index)
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -730,10 +730,10 @@ struct SubstLookupSubTable
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
inline bool sanitize (hb_sanitize_context_t *context) {
|
||||
inline bool sanitize (hb_sanitize_context_t *context, unsigned int lookup_type) {
|
||||
TRACE_SANITIZE ();
|
||||
if (!u.format.sanitize (context)) return false;
|
||||
switch (u.format) {
|
||||
if (!u.sub_format.sanitize (context)) return false;
|
||||
switch (lookup_type) {
|
||||
case Single: return u.single.sanitize (context);
|
||||
case Multiple: return u.multiple.sanitize (context);
|
||||
case Alternate: return u.alternate.sanitize (context);
|
||||
|
@ -748,7 +748,7 @@ struct SubstLookupSubTable
|
|||
|
||||
private:
|
||||
union {
|
||||
USHORT format;
|
||||
USHORT sub_format;
|
||||
SingleSubst single;
|
||||
MultipleSubst multiple;
|
||||
AlternateSubst alternate;
|
||||
|
@ -759,7 +759,7 @@ struct SubstLookupSubTable
|
|||
ReverseChainSingleSubst reverseChainContextSingle;
|
||||
} u;
|
||||
public:
|
||||
DEFINE_SIZE_UNION (2, format);
|
||||
DEFINE_SIZE_UNION (2, sub_format);
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -870,7 +870,7 @@ struct SubstLookup : Lookup
|
|||
TRACE_SANITIZE ();
|
||||
if (unlikely (!Lookup::sanitize (context))) return false;
|
||||
OffsetArrayOf<SubstLookupSubTable> &list = CastR<OffsetArrayOf<SubstLookupSubTable> > (subTable);
|
||||
return list.sanitize (context, this);
|
||||
return list.sanitize (context, this, get_type ());
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -918,7 +918,7 @@ inline bool ExtensionSubst::sanitize (hb_sanitize_context_t *context)
|
|||
if (unlikely (!Extension::sanitize (context))) return false;
|
||||
unsigned int offset = get_offset ();
|
||||
if (unlikely (!offset)) return true;
|
||||
return StructAtOffset<SubstLookupSubTable> (this, offset).sanitize (context);
|
||||
return StructAtOffset<SubstLookupSubTable> (this, offset).sanitize (context, get_type ());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
inline bool ExtensionSubst::is_reverse (void) const
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue