In file included from hb-face.cc:35:
hb-ot-cmap-table.hh: In member function 'void OT::CmapSubtableFormat4::_compiles_assertion_on_line_388() const':
hb-ot-cmap-table.hh:388: error: ISO C++ says that these are ambiguous, even though the worst conversion for the first is better than the worst conversion for the second:
hb-open-type.hh:354: note: candidate 1: const Type& OT::UnsizedArrayOf<Type>::operator[](unsigned int) const [with Type = OT::IntType<short unsigned int, 2u>]
hb-ot-cmap-table.hh:388: note: candidate 2: operator[](const T*, int) <built-in>
hb-ot-cmap-table.hh: In member function 'void OT::CmapSubtableFormat4::_instance_assertion_on_line_388() const':
hb-ot-cmap-table.hh:388: error: ISO C++ says that these are ambiguous, even though the worst conversion for the first is better than the worst conversion for the second:
hb-open-type.hh:354: note: candidate 1: const Type& OT::UnsizedArrayOf<Type>::operator[](unsigned int) const [with Type = OT::IntType<short unsigned int, 2u>]
hb-ot-cmap-table.hh:388: note: candidate 2: operator[](const T*, int) <built-in>
hb-face.cc: In function 'hb_blob_t* _hb_face_builder_data_reference_blob(hb_face_builder_data_t*)':
hb-face.cc:650: error: ISO C++ says that these are ambiguous, even though the worst conversion for the first is better than the worst conversion for the second:
hb-vector.hh:81: note: candidate 1: Type& hb_vector_t<Type, PreallocedCount>::operator[](unsigned int) [with Type = hb_face_builder_data_t::table_entry_t, unsigned int PreallocedCount = 32u]
hb-face.cc:650: note: candidate 2: operator[](T*, int) <built-in>
hb-face.cc:650: error: ISO C++ says that these are ambiguous, even though the worst conversion for the first is better than the worst conversion for the second:
hb-vector.hh:81: note: candidate 1: Type& hb_vector_t<Type, PreallocedCount>::operator[](unsigned int) [with Type = hb_face_builder_data_t::table_entry_t, unsigned int PreallocedCount = 32u]
hb-face.cc:650: note: candidate 2: operator[](const T*, int) <built-in>
hb-face.cc:651: error: ISO C++ says that these are ambiguous, even though the worst conversion for the first is better than the worst conversion for the second:
hb-vector.hh:81: note: candidate 1: Type& hb_vector_t<Type, PreallocedCount>::operator[](unsigned int) [with Type = hb_face_builder_data_t::table_entry_t, unsigned int PreallocedCount = 32u]
hb-face.cc:651: note: candidate 2: operator[](T*, int) <built-in>
hb-face.cc:651: error: ISO C++ says that these are ambiguous, even though the worst conversion for the first is better than the worst conversion for the second:
hb-vector.hh:81: note: candidate 1: Type& hb_vector_t<Type, PreallocedCount>::operator[](unsigned int) [with Type = hb_face_builder_data_t::table_entry_t, unsigned int PreallocedCount = 32u]
hb-face.cc:651: note: candidate 2: operator[](const T*, int) <built-in>
Profiling showed that type conversions were adding considerable cycles in time
spent doing text shaping.
The idea is to optimize it using native processor instructions to help Blink
layout performance.
Doing further investigation revelead that compilers may not use the
proper instruction on ARM 32bits builds (i.e. REV16).
One way to insure that the generated ASM was ideal for both gcc/clang
was using __builtin_bswap16.
Added bonus is that we no longer need to test for CPU architecture.
Newer compilers / language allows structs with constructor in union.
So, this was not actually testing anything. Indeed, the recent
change in DISALLOW_COPY *is* making some of our types non-POD.
That broke some bots.
Just remove this since it wasn't doing much, and I'd rather have
DISALLOW_COPY.
Was givin a dozen of:
../../src/hb-machinery.hh: In member function ‘bool AAT::ankr::sanitize(hb_sanitize_context_t*) const’:
../../src/hb-machinery.hh:307:23: warning: missed loop optimization, the loop counter may overflow [-Wunsafe-loop-optimizations]
bool ok = --this->max_ops > 0 &&
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
this->start <= p &&
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
p <= this->end &&
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~
(unsigned int) (this->end - p) >= len;
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I believe those are bogus, but this silences them and does not introduce
logic issues I believe.
Some clang versions define static_assert as a macro apparently, so we cannot
redefine it...
This reverts commit 94bfea0ce6.
This reverts commit 4e62627831.
We're going to (finally) use virtual methods for hb_serialize_context_t
customization, so don't need to carry a Serializer template variable
around... Simplifies code.
Ebrahim Byagowi
Behdad Esfahbod
Adenilson Cavalcanti
Garret Rieger
Bruce Mitchener