Newer compilers / language allows structs with constructor in union.
So, this was not actually testing anything. Indeed, the recent
change in DISALLOW_COPY *is* making some of our types non-POD.
That broke some bots.
Just remove this since it wasn't doing much, and I'd rather have
DISALLOW_COPY.
Fixes https://github.com/harfbuzz/harfbuzz/issues/1019
New numbers:
BENGALI: 353725 out of 354188 tests passed. 463 failed (0.130722%)
DEVANAGARI: 707261 out of 707394 tests passed. 133 failed (0.0188014%)
GUJARATI: 366353 out of 366457 tests passed. 104 failed (0.0283799%)
GURMUKHI: 60729 out of 60747 tests passed. 18 failed (0.0296311%)
KANNADA: 951300 out of 951913 tests passed. 613 failed (0.0643966%)
MALAYALAM: 1048136 out of 1048334 tests passed. 198 failed (0.0188871%)
ORIYA: 42327 out of 42329 tests passed. 2 failed (0.00472489%)
SINHALA: 271596 out of 271847 tests passed. 251 failed (0.0923313%)
TAMIL: 1091754 out of 1091754 tests passed. 0 failed (0%)
TELUGU: 970555 out of 970573 tests passed. 18 failed (0.00185457%)
Devanagari regressed because Uniscribe doesn't enforce the full set.
Tests added with the *-vowel-letters.txt files in tree and Noto fonts.
Alternative woul have been to resurrect F_COMBINE that I removed in
70136a78cb
But this does it for now. I'm not sure why check-static-inits.sh didn't
catch this before. Clang -Weverything bot did:
CXX libharfbuzz_la-hb-ot-shape-complex-indic.lo
hb-ot-shape-complex-indic.cc:99:1: warning: declaration requires a global constructor [-Wglobal-constructors]
indic_features[] =
^
1 warning generated.
CXX libharfbuzz_la-hb-ot-shape-complex-khmer.lo
hb-ot-shape-complex-khmer.cc:36:1: warning: declaration requires a global constructor [-Wglobal-constructors]
khmer_features[] =
^
1 warning generated.
Oriya went down from 9 to 2.
BENGALI: 353725 out of 354188 tests passed. 463 failed (0.130722%)
DEVANAGARI: 707311 out of 707394 tests passed. 83 failed (0.0117332%)
GUJARATI: 366355 out of 366457 tests passed. 102 failed (0.0278341%)
GURMUKHI: 60729 out of 60747 tests passed. 18 failed (0.0296311%)
KANNADA: 951300 out of 951913 tests passed. 613 failed (0.0643966%)
MALAYALAM: 1048136 out of 1048334 tests passed. 198 failed (0.0188871%)
MYANMAR: 1115830 out of 1123883 tests passed. 8053 failed (0.716534%)
ORIYA: 42327 out of 42329 tests passed. 2 failed (0.00472489%)
SINHALA: 271596 out of 271847 tests passed. 251 failed (0.0923313%)
TAMIL: 1091754 out of 1091754 tests passed. 0 failed (0%)
TELUGU: 970555 out of 970573 tests passed. 18 failed (0.00185457%)
From the new code (first paragraph is from the OT Devanagari spec.):
/* o Reorder matras:
*
* If a pre-base matra character had been reordered before applying basic
* features, the glyph can be moved closer to the main consonant based on
* whether half-forms had been formed. Actual position for the matra is
* defined as “after last standalone halant glyph, after initial matra
* position and before the main consonant”. If ZWJ or ZWNJ follow this
* halant, position is moved after it.
*
* IMPLEMENTATION NOTES:
*
* It looks like the last sentence is wrong. Testing, with Windows 7 Uniscribe
* and Devanagari shows that the behavior is best described as:
*
* "If ZWJ follows this halant, matra is NOT repositioned after this halant.
* If ZWNJ follows this halant, position is moved after it."
*
* Test case, with Adobe Devanagari or Nirmala UI:
*
* U+091F,U+094D,U+200C,U+092F,U+093F
* (Matra moves to the middle, after ZWNJ.)
*
* U+091F,U+094D,U+200D,U+092F,U+093F
* (Matra does NOT move, stays to the left.)
Fixes https://github.com/harfbuzz/harfbuzz/issues/1070
Test case added with Adobe Devanagari.
Behdad Esfahbod
Eric Muller
Adrian Wong
Ebrahim Byagowi
Behdad Esfahbod
David Corbett
Nathan Willis
Unknown