Originally we fixed those in 79d1007a50.
However, fonts like MongolianWhite don't have GDEF, but have IgnoreMarks
in their LigatureSubstitute init/etc features. We were synthesizing a
GDEF class of mark for Mongolian Variation Selectors and as such the
ligature lookups where not matching. Uniscribe doesn't do that.
I tried with more sophisticated fixes, like, if there is no GDEF and
a lookup-flag mismatch happens, instead of rejecting a match, try
skipping that glyph. That surely produces some interesting behavior,
but since we don't want to support fonts missing GDEF more than we have
to, I went for this simpler fix which is to always mark
default-ignorables as base when synthesizing GDEF.
Micro-test added.
Fixes rest of https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65258
Only if the font doesn't support it. Ie, this gives the user to
use non-Unicode codepoints as private values and return a meaningful
glyph for them. But if it's invalid and font callback doesn't
like it, and if font has U+FFFD, show that instead.
Font functions that do not want this automatic replacement to
happen should return true from get_glyph() if unicode > 0x10FFFF.
Replaces https://github.com/behdad/harfbuzz/pull/27
There may be more. There are members that are by definition
redundant or reserved and not needed, NOT what we *currently*
don't use.
I'm sure there's more...
Add hb_ot_layout_language_get_required_feature_index() again, which
is used in Pango. This was removed in
da13293798 in favor of
hb_ot_layout_language_get_required_feature().
API changes:
- Added hb_ot_layout_language_get_required_feature_index back.
HB_VERSION_CHECK's comparison was originally written wrongly
by mistake. When API tests were written, they were also written
wrongly to pass given the wrong implementation... Sigh.
Given the purpose of this API, there's no point in fixing it
without renaming it. As such, rename.
API changes:
HB_VERSION_CHECK -> HB_VERSION_ATLEAST
hb_version_check -> hb_version_atleast
If pre-base reordering Ra is NOT formed (or formed and then
broken up), we should consider that Ra as base. This is
observable when there's a left matra or dotreph that positions
before base.
Now, it might be that we shouldn't do this if the Ra happend
to form a below form. We can't quite deduce that right now...
Micro test added. Also at:
https://code.google.com/a/google.com/p/noto-alpha/issues/detail?id=186#c29
Sometimes font designers form half/pref/etc consonant forms
unconditionally and then undo that conditionally. Try to
recover the OT_H classification in those cases.
No test number changes expected.
Normally if you want to, say, conditionally prevent a 'pref', you
would use blocking contextual matching. Some designers instead
form the 'pref' form, then undo it in context. To detect that
we now also remember glyphs that went through MultipleSubst.
In the only place that this is used, Uniscribe seems to only care
about the "last" transformation between Ligature and Multiple
substitions. Ie. if you ligate, expand, and ligate again, it
moves the pref, but if you ligate and expand it doesn't. That's
why we clear the MULTIPLIED bit when setting LIGATED.
Micro-test added. Test: U+0D2F,0D4D,0D30 with font from:
[1]
https://code.google.com/a/google.com/p/noto-alpha/issues/detail?id=186#c29
Roboto was hitting this. FreeType also has pretty much the
same code for this, in ttcmap.c:tt_cmap4_validate():
/* in certain fonts, the `length' field is invalid and goes */
/* out of bound. We try to correct this here... */
if ( table + length > valid->limit )
{
if ( valid->level >= FT_VALIDATE_TIGHT )
FT_INVALID_TOO_SHORT;
length = (FT_UInt)( valid->limit - table );
}
Sinhala and Telugu use "explicit" reph. That is, the reph is formed by
a Ra,H,ZWJ sequence. Previously, upon detecting this sequence, we were
checking checking whether the 'rphf' feature applies to the first two
glyphs of the sequence. This is how the Microsoft fonts are designed.
However, testing with Noto shows that apparently Uniscribe also forms
the reph if the lookup ligates all three glyphs. So, try both
sequences.
Doesn't affect test results for Sinhala or Telugu.
https://code.google.com/a/google.com/p/noto-alpha/issues/detail?id=232
The grammar in the OT spec, and the existing Windows implementation
seem to be confused around where to allow Asat around the medial
consonants.
The previous grammar for medial group was allowing an Asat after
the medial group only if there was a medial Wa or Ha, but not if
there was only a medial Ya. This doesn't make sense to me and
sounds reversed, as both medial Wa and Ha are below marks while
Asat is an above mark. An Asat can come before the medial group
already (in fact, multiple ones can. Why?!). The medial Ya
however is a spacing mark and according to Roozbeh it's valid
to want an Asat on the medial Ya instead of the base, so it looks
to me like we want to allow an Asat after the medial group if
there *was* a Ya but not if there wasn't any. Not wanting to
produce dotted-circle where Windows is not, this commit changes
the grammar to allow one Asat after the medial group no matter
what comes in the group.
Test: U+1002,103A,103B vs U+1002,103B,103A
Before we were just relying on the compiler inlining them and not
leaving a trace in our public API. Try to fix. Hopefully not
breaking anyone's build.
commit b5a0f69e47
Author: Behdad Esfahbod <behdad@behdad.org>
Date: Thu Oct 17 18:04:23 2013 +0200
[indic] Pass zero-context=false to would_substitute for newer scripts
For scripts without an old/new spec distinction, use zero-context=false.
This changes behavior in Sinhala / Khmer, but doesn't seem to regress.
This will be useful and used in Javanese.
The *intention* was to change zero-context from true to false for scripts that
don't have old-vs-new specs. However, checking the code, looks like we
essentially change zero-context to always be true; ie. we only changed things
for old-spec, and we broke them. That's what causes this bug:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76705
The root of the bug is here:
/* Use zero-context would_substitute() matching for new-spec of the main
* Indic scripts, but not for old-spec or scripts with one spec only. */
bool zero_context = indic_plan->config->has_old_spec || !indic_plan->is_old_spec;
Note that is_old_spec itself is:
indic_plan->is_old_spec = indic_plan->config->has_old_spec && ((plan->map.chosen_script[0] & 0x000000FF) != '2');
It's easy to show that zero_context is now always true. What we really meant was:
bool zero_context = indic_plan->config->has_old_spec && !indic_plan->is_old_spec;
Ie, "&&" instead of "||". We made this change supposedly to make Javanese
work. But apparently we got it working regardless! So I'm going to fix this
to only change the logic for old-spec and not touch other cases.
This is a higher-priority shaper than default shaper ("ot"), but
only picks up fonts that have AAT "morx"/"mort" table.
Note that for this to work the font face's get_table() implementation
should know how to return the full font blob.
Based on patch from Konstantin Ritt.
Not exhaustively tested, but I think I got the intended logic
right.
The logic can perhaps be simplified. Maybe we should disabled
normalization with this shaper. Then again, for now focusing on
correctness.
When seeing U+2044 FRACTION SLASH in the text, find decimal
digits (Unicode General Category Decimal_Number) around it,
and mark the pre-slash digits with 'numr' feature, the post-slash
digits with 'dnom' feature, and the whole sequence with 'frac'
feature.
This beautifully renders fractions with major Windows fonts,
and any other font that implements those features (numr/dnom is
enough for most fonts.)
Not the fastest way to do this, but good enough for a start.
CoreText does automatic font fallback (AKA "cascading") for characters
not supported by the requested font, and provides no way to turn it off,
so detect if the returned run uses a font other than the requested one
and fill in the buffer with .notdef glyphs instead of random indices
glyph from a different font.
The spec and Uniscribe don't allow these, but UTN#11
specifically says the sequence U+104B,U+1038 is valid.
As such, allow all "P V" sequences. There's about
eight sequences that match that structure, but Roozbeh
thinks it's fine to allow all of them.
Test case: U+104B, U+1038
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71947
The spec and Uniscribe treat it as consonant in the grammar, but
it's not in IndicSyllableCategory.txt, so fix up.
Test sequence: U+1004,U+103A,U+1039,U+104E
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71948
This is broken sequence according to OpenType spec, Uniscribe,
and current HarfBuzz implementation. But Roozbeh says this
is a valid sequence, so allow it. There are multiple
"(DB As?)?" constructs in the grammar, but Roozbeh thinks only
this one needs changing.
Test case: 1014,1063,103A
Fixes https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71949
Based on research into latest SIL and Windows fonts, pulling in
the latest OpenType language tag proposal from Microsoft, and updating
to latest language tags and names from ISO 639.
This reverts commit d5bd0590ae.
The reasoning behind that logic was flawed and made under
a misunderstanding of the original problem, and caused
regressions as reported by Jonathan Kew in thread titled
"tibetan marks" in Oct 2013. Apparently I have had fixed
the original problem with this commit:
7e08f1258d
So, revert the faulty commit and everything seems to be in good
shape.
For Javanese (pref_len == 1) only reorder if it didn't ligate. That's
sensible, and what the spec says. For other Indic (pref_len > 1)
only reorder if ligated.
Doesn't change any test numbers.
Bug 58714 - Kannada u+0cb0 u+200d u+0ccd u+0c95 u+0cbe does not provide
same results as Windows8
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58714
Test with U+0CB0,U+200D,U+0CCD,U+0C95,U+0CBF and tunga.ttf.
Improves some scripts. Improves Bengali too, but numbers
are up because we produce better results than Uniscribe for some
sequences now.
New numbers:
BENGALI: 353724 out of 354188 tests passed. 464 failed (0.131004%)
DEVANAGARI: 707307 out of 707394 tests passed. 87 failed (0.0122987%)
GUJARATI: 366349 out of 366457 tests passed. 108 failed (0.0294714%)
GURMUKHI: 60732 out of 60747 tests passed. 15 failed (0.0246926%)
KANNADA: 951190 out of 951913 tests passed. 723 failed (0.0759523%)
KHMER: 299070 out of 299124 tests passed. 54 failed (0.0180527%)
MALAYALAM: 1048140 out of 1048334 tests passed. 194 failed (0.0185056%)
ORIYA: 42320 out of 42329 tests passed. 9 failed (0.021262%)
SINHALA: 271662 out of 271847 tests passed. 185 failed (0.068053%)
TAMIL: 1091753 out of 1091754 tests passed. 1 failed (9.15957e-05%)
TELUGU: 970555 out of 970573 tests passed. 18 failed (0.00185457%)
Lohit-Punjabi has a upem of 769! We were losing one unit in our
code, and FreeType is losing another one... Test with U+0A06.
Has an advance of 854 in the font. We were producing 852.
Now we do 853, which is what FreeType is telling us.
See comments from caveat! Seems to work fine.
This is useful for Javanese which has an atomically encoded pre-base
reordering Ra which should only be reordered if it was substituted
by the pref feature.
For scripts without an old/new spec distinction, use zero-context=false.
This changes behavior in Sinhala / Khmer, but doesn't seem to regress.
This will be useful and used in Javanese.
Whic means these twp are applied per-syllable now. Apparently
in some Khmer fonts the clig interacts with presentation features.
Test case: U+1781,U+17D2,U+1789,U+17BB,U+17C6 with Mondulkiri-R.ttf
should produce one big ligature.
Commit 6b65a76b40. "end" was becoming
negative. Was trigerred by Lohit-Kannada 2.5.3 and the sequence:
U+0CB0,U+200D,U+0CBE,U+0CB7,U+0CCD,U+0C9F,U+0CCD,U+0CB0,U+0C97,U+0CB3
Two glyphs were being duplicated.
First, we were abusing OT_VD instead of OT_A. Fix that
but moving OT_A in the grammar where it belongs (which
is different from what the spec says).
Also, only allow medial consonants after all other
consonants. This doesn't affect any current character.
Finally, fix Halant attachment in presence of medial
consonants. Again, this currently doesn't affect any
sequence.
I lied. There's Gurmukhi U+0A75 which is Consonant_Medial.
Uniscribe allows one of those in each of these positions:
before matras, after matras and before syllable modifiers,
and after syllable modifiers! We currently just allow
unlimited numbers of it, before matras.
Unicode 6.2.0 Section 16.2 / Figure 16.3 says:
"For backward compatibility, between Arabic characters a ZWJ acts just
like the sequence <ZWJ, ZWNJ, ZWJ>, preventing a ligature from forming
instead of requesting the use of a ligature that would not normally be
used. As a result, there is no plain text mechanism for requesting the
use of a ligature in Arabic text."
As such, we flip internal zwj to zwnj flags for GSUB matching, which
means it will block ligation in all features, unless the font
explicitly matches U+200D glyph. This doesn't affect joining behavior.
Bug 70509 - Candrabindu+Visarga doesn't work in Devanagari
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70509
We categorize both bindus and visarga as syllable-modifiers.
OT spec doesn't actually say what characters go in the syllable
modifier category, and allows one. We just allow up to two now.
Test case: U+0930,U+0941,U+0901,U+0903
Uniscribe currently doesn't support that and produces a
dotted circle.
Seems to better match Uniscribe.
Note: NotoSansTelugu-Regular has kern feature, so this fixes most of the
positioning failures there, except for the kern pairs blocked by a
(non-)joiner, in which case we (correctly) kern, but Uniscribe doesn't.
More like Uniscribe... We still allow user-defined features to
work across syllables, but not pres,blws,abs,psts,etc.
This "regressed" Sinhala numbers by 11. These are cases were
there's Consonant followed by Ra,Halant,ZWJ at the of text.
The Ra,Halant,ZWJ ends up forming reph, which is wrong...
But before we were also ligating that reph with the previous
consonant. That's even more wrong. That's also what Uniscribe
does.
Current numbers:
BENGALI: 353732 out of 354188 tests passed. 456 failed (0.128745%)
DEVANAGARI: 707307 out of 707394 tests passed. 87 failed (0.0122987%)
GUJARATI: 366349 out of 366457 tests passed. 108 failed (0.0294714%)
GURMUKHI: 60732 out of 60747 tests passed. 15 failed (0.0246926%)
KANNADA: 951030 out of 951913 tests passed. 883 failed (0.0927606%)
KHMER: 299070 out of 299124 tests passed. 54 failed (0.0180527%)
MALAYALAM: 1048140 out of 1048334 tests passed. 194 failed (0.0185056%)
ORIYA: 42320 out of 42329 tests passed. 9 failed (0.021262%)
SINHALA: 271655 out of 271847 tests passed. 192 failed (0.070628%)
TAMIL: 1091753 out of 1091754 tests passed. 1 failed (9.15957e-05%)
TELUGU: 970555 out of 970573 tests passed. 18 failed (0.00185457%)
Previously we only supported recursive sublookups with
ascending indices. We were also not correctly handling
non-1-to-1 recursed lookups.
Fix all that!
Fixes the three tests in test/shaping/tests/context-matching.tests,
which were derived from NotoSansBengali and NotoSansDevanagari
among others.
Behdad Esfahbod
Jonathan Kew
Oleg Oshmyan
Primiano Tucci
Konstantin Ritt
Werner Lemberg
Luis de Bethencourt
Khaled Hosny
Roozbeh Pournader