Behdad Esfahbod 1d634cbb4b Fix base-position when 'pref' is NOT formed ... If pre-base reordering Ra is NOT formed (or formed and then broken up), we should consider that Ra as base. This is observable when there's a left matra or dotreph that positions before base. Now, it might be that we shouldn't do this if the Ra happend to form a below form. We can't quite deduce that right now... Micro test added. Also at: https://code.google.com/a/google.com/p/noto-alpha/issues/detail?id=186#c29		2014-06-12 17:10:35 -04:00
..
4cce528e99f600ed9c25a2b69e32eb94a03b4ae8.ttf	Add test suite for shaping results	2013-10-14 18:54:51 +02:00
226bc2deab3846f1a682085f70c67d0421014144.ttf	[indic] Don't reorder reph/pref if ligature was expanded	2014-06-05 20:36:01 -04:00
MANIFEST	Fix base-position when 'pref' is NOT formed	2014-06-12 17:10:35 -04:00
d629e7fedc0b350222d7987345fe61613fa3929a.ttf	Add test suite for shaping results	2013-10-14 18:54:51 +02:00
e207635780b42f898d58654b65098763e340f5c7.ttf	Fix base-position when 'pref' is NOT formed	2014-06-12 17:10:35 -04:00
f499fbc23865022234775c43503bba2e63978fe1.ttf	Add test suite for shaping results	2013-10-14 18:54:51 +02:00