Behdad Esfahbod 1d634cbb4b Fix base-position when 'pref' is NOT formed ... If pre-base reordering Ra is NOT formed (or formed and then broken up), we should consider that Ra as base. This is observable when there's a left matra or dotreph that positions before base. Now, it might be that we shouldn't do this if the Ra happend to form a below form. We can't quite deduce that right now... Micro test added. Also at: https://code.google.com/a/google.com/p/noto-alpha/issues/detail?id=186#c29		2014-06-12 17:10:35 -04:00
..
MANIFEST	[indic] Don't reorder reph/pref if ligature was expanded	2014-06-05 20:36:01 -04:00
context-matching.tests	[tests] Remove Myanmar micro-font and test	2013-10-15 18:21:32 +02:00
indic-pref-blocking.tests	Fix base-position when 'pref' is NOT formed	2014-06-12 17:10:35 -04:00