walkero
/
lite-xl
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 7 Pull Requests Projects Releases 14 Wiki Activity

More accurate logic for node's remove view method 

Provide an fix like:

https://github.com/lite-xl/lite-xl/pull/526

but use instead the is_primary_node property and the context
property.

We align the logic to the one used in the close_all_views method.

The approach using get_locked_size was the old approach using by
rxi's lite but it should no longer be used to determine if a node
if part of the application UI or part of the document's view.
This commit is contained in:
Francesco Abbate 2021-09-14 12:20:58 +02:00
parent 25744d93ce
commit 5a69928924
1 changed files with 13 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

14
data/core/rootview.lua
View File

@ -128,6 +128,18 @@ function Node:split(dir, view, locked, resizable)
return self.b
end
function Node:is_application()
if self.type == "leaf" then
for i = 1, #self.views do
if self.views[i].context == "application" then return true end
end
else
return self.a:is_application() or self.b:is_application()
end
end
function Node:remove_view(root, view)
if #self.views > 1 then
local idx = self:get_view_idx(view)
@ -142,7 +154,7 @@ function Node:remove_view(root, view)
local parent = self:get_parent_node(root)
local is_a = (parent.a == self)
local other = parent[is_a and "b" or "a"]
if other:get_locked_size() then
if self.is_primary_node and other:is_application() then
self.views = {}
self:add_view(EmptyView())
else