[trunk] Make sure the memory is initialized. valgrind was complaning in mqc_init_enc we were reading uninit value. See also comment in r479: FIXME: mqc_init_enc and mqc_byteout underrun the buffer if we don't do this. Why?

This commit is contained in:
Mathieu Malaterre 2012-05-14 14:38:02 +00:00
parent 589b247926
commit 1c3273aab2
1 changed files with 5 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -437,6 +437,8 @@ void tcd_malloc_encode(opj_tcd_t *tcd, opj_image_t * image, opj_cp_t * cp, int c
cblk->y1 = int_min(cblkyend, prc->y1);
cblk->data = (unsigned char*) opj_calloc(8192+2, sizeof(unsigned char));
/* FIXME: mqc_init_enc and mqc_byteout underrun the buffer if we don't do this. Why? */
cblk->data[0] = 0;
cblk->data[1] = 0;
cblk->data += 2;
cblk->layers = (opj_tcd_layer_t*) opj_calloc(100, sizeof(opj_tcd_layer_t));
cblk->passes = (opj_tcd_pass_t*) opj_calloc(100, sizeof(opj_tcd_pass_t));
@ -696,6 +698,8 @@ void tcd_init_encode(opj_tcd_t *tcd, opj_image_t * image, opj_cp_t * cp, int cur
cblk->y1 = int_min(cblkyend, prc->y1);
cblk->data = (unsigned char*) opj_calloc(8192+2, sizeof(unsigned char));
/* FIXME: mqc_init_enc and mqc_byteout underrun the buffer if we don't do this. Why? */
cblk->data[0] = 0;
cblk->data[1] = 0;
cblk->data += 2;
cblk->layers = (opj_tcd_layer_t*) opj_calloc(100, sizeof(opj_tcd_layer_t));
cblk->passes = (opj_tcd_pass_t*) opj_calloc(100, sizeof(opj_tcd_pass_t));
@ -2425,6 +2429,7 @@ opj_bool tcd_code_block_enc_allocate (opj_tcd_cblk_enc_v2_t * p_code_block)
return OPJ_FALSE;
}
p_code_block->data[0] = 0;
p_code_block->data+=1;
/* no memset since data */