[trunk] prevent overflow in j2k.c

Update issue 392

Issue left open to solve problem on x64-Asan and to investigate Matthieu's suggestion
This commit is contained in:
Antonin Descampe 2014-10-30 11:53:06 +00:00
parent 09fb8b6989
commit 7f8f284ee5
1 changed files with 19 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -3684,6 +3684,15 @@ OPJ_BOOL j2k_read_ppm_v3 (
OPJ_BYTE *new_ppm_data;
/* Increase the size of ppm_data to add the new Ippm series*/
assert(l_cp->ppm_data == l_cp->ppm_buffer && "We need ppm_data and ppm_buffer to be the same when reallocating");
/* Overflow check */
if ((l_cp->ppm_len + l_N_ppm) < l_N_ppm) {
opj_free(l_cp->ppm_data);
l_cp->ppm_data = NULL;
l_cp->ppm_buffer = NULL; /* TODO: no need for a new local variable: ppm_buffer and ppm_data are enough */
l_cp->ppm_len = 0;
opj_event_msg(p_manager, EVT_ERROR, "Not enough memory to increase the size of ppm_data to add the new (complete) Ippm series\n");
return OPJ_FALSE;
}
new_ppm_data = (OPJ_BYTE *) opj_realloc(l_cp->ppm_data, l_cp->ppm_len + l_N_ppm);
if (! new_ppm_data) {
opj_free(l_cp->ppm_data);
@ -3707,6 +3716,16 @@ OPJ_BOOL j2k_read_ppm_v3 (
if (l_remaining_data) {
OPJ_BYTE *new_ppm_data;
assert(l_cp->ppm_data == l_cp->ppm_buffer && "We need ppm_data and ppm_buffer to be the same when reallocating");
/* Overflow check */
if ((l_cp->ppm_len + l_N_ppm) < l_N_ppm) {
opj_free(l_cp->ppm_data);
l_cp->ppm_data = NULL;
l_cp->ppm_buffer = NULL; /* TODO: no need for a new local variable: ppm_buffer and ppm_data are enough */
l_cp->ppm_len = 0;
opj_event_msg(p_manager, EVT_ERROR, "Not enough memory to increase the size of ppm_data to add the new (complete) Ippm series\n");
return OPJ_FALSE;
}
new_ppm_data = (OPJ_BYTE *) opj_realloc(l_cp->ppm_data, l_cp->ppm_len + l_N_ppm);
if (! new_ppm_data) {
opj_free(l_cp->ppm_data);