openjp2/j2k: Validate all SGcod/SPcod/SPcoc parameter values.

Previously the multiple component transformation SGcod(C)
and wavelet transformation SPcod(H)/SPcoc(E) parameter
values were never checked, allowing for out of range values.

The lack of validation allowed the bit stream provided in
issue #1158 through. After this commit an error message
points to the marker segments' parameters as being out of
range.

input/nonregression/edf_c2_20.jp2 contains an SPcod(H) value
of 17, but according to Table A-20 of the specification only
values 0 and 1 are valid. input/nonregression/issue826.jp2
contains a SGcod(B) value of 2, but according to Table A-17
of the specification only values 0 and 1 are valid.
input/nonregression/oss-fuzz2785.jp2 contains a SGcod(B)
value of 32, but it is likewise limited to 0 or 1. These test
cases have been updated to consistently fail to parse the
headers since they contain out of bounds values.

This fixes issue #1210.

src/lib/openjp2/j2k.c

@@ -2698,6 +2698,12 @@ static OPJ_BOOL opj_j2k_read_cod(opj_j2k_t *p_j2k,
     opj_read_bytes(p_header_data, &l_tcp->mct, 1);          /* SGcod (C) */
     ++p_header_data;
 
+    if (l_tcp->mct > 1) {
+        opj_event_msg(p_manager, EVT_ERROR,
+                      "Invalid multiple component transformation\n");
+        return OPJ_FALSE;
+    }
+
     p_header_size -= 5;
     for (i = 0; i < l_image->numcomps; ++i) {
         l_tcp->tccps[i].csty = l_tcp->csty & J2K_CCP_CSTY_PRT;
@@ -9792,6 +9798,12 @@ static OPJ_BOOL opj_j2k_read_SPCod_SPCoc(opj_j2k_t *p_j2k,
     opj_read_bytes(l_current_ptr, &l_tccp->qmfbid, 1);
     ++l_current_ptr;
 
+    if (l_tccp->qmfbid > 1) {
+        opj_event_msg(p_manager, EVT_ERROR,
+                      "Error reading SPCod SPCoc element, Invalid transformation found\n");
+        return OPJ_FALSE;
+    }
+
     *p_header_size = *p_header_size - 5;
 
     /* use custom precinct size ? */

tests/nonregression/CMakeLists.txt

@@ -34,7 +34,6 @@ set(BLACKLIST_JPEG2000_TMP
     edf_c2_1178956.jp2
     edf_c2_1000290.jp2
     #edf_c2_1000691.jp2 # ok
-    #edf_c2_20.jp2 #looks ok as per kdu_jp2info
     edf_c2_1377017.jp2
     edf_c2_1002767.jp2
     edf_c2_10025.jp2
@@ -61,6 +60,7 @@ set(BLACKLIST_JPEG2000
     broken2.jp2
     broken3.jp2
     broken4.jp2
+    edf_c2_20.jp2 #may look ok as per kdu_jp2info, but inspection it reveals that the transformation value is out of range
     gdal_fuzzer_assert_in_opj_j2k_read_SQcd_SQcc.patch.jp2	
     gdal_fuzzer_check_comp_dx_dy.jp2
     gdal_fuzzer_check_number_of_tiles.jp2
@@ -82,6 +82,8 @@ set(BLACKLIST_JPEG2000
     issue475.jp2 #kdu_jp2info ok
     issue413.jp2 #kdu_jp2info ok
     issue823.jp2 #kdu_jp2info ok
+    issue826.jp2 #inspection reveales that the transformation value is out of range
+    oss-fuzz2785.jp2 #inspection reveales that the transformation value is out of range
    )
 
 file(GLOB_RECURSE OPJ_DATA_NR_LIST