[trunk] Rework r2458, instead we should reject 451.pdf.SIGSEGV.ce9.3723 since tile-parts are out of order (as per kakadu behavior).
Update issue 225
This commit is contained in:
parent
1b93cb8c0a
commit
fd5f21af00
|
@ -4010,12 +4010,20 @@ OPJ_BOOL opj_j2k_read_sot ( opj_j2k_t *p_j2k,
|
||||||
if (l_num_parts != 0) { /* Number of tile-part header is provided by this tile-part header */
|
if (l_num_parts != 0) { /* Number of tile-part header is provided by this tile-part header */
|
||||||
/* Useful to manage the case of textGBR.jp2 file because two values of TNSot are allowed: the correct numbers of
|
/* Useful to manage the case of textGBR.jp2 file because two values of TNSot are allowed: the correct numbers of
|
||||||
* tile-parts for that tile and zero (A.4.2 of 15444-1 : 2002). */
|
* tile-parts for that tile and zero (A.4.2 of 15444-1 : 2002). */
|
||||||
if (l_num_parts < l_tcp->m_nb_tile_parts) {
|
if (l_tcp->m_nb_tile_parts) {
|
||||||
l_num_parts = l_tcp->m_nb_tile_parts;
|
if (l_current_part >= l_tcp->m_nb_tile_parts){
|
||||||
|
opj_event_msg(p_manager, EVT_ERROR, "In SOT marker, TPSot (%d) is not valid regards to the current "
|
||||||
|
"number of tile-part (%d), giving up\n", l_current_part, l_tcp->m_nb_tile_parts );
|
||||||
|
p_j2k->m_specific_param.m_decoder.m_last_tile_part = 1;
|
||||||
|
return OPJ_FALSE;
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
if (l_current_part >= l_num_parts) {
|
if( l_current_part >= l_num_parts ) {
|
||||||
/* testcase 451.pdf.SIGSEGV.ce9.3723 */
|
/* testcase 451.pdf.SIGSEGV.ce9.3723 */
|
||||||
l_num_parts = l_current_part + 1;
|
opj_event_msg(p_manager, EVT_ERROR, "In SOT marker, TPSot (%d) is not valid regards to the current "
|
||||||
|
"number of tile-part (header) (%d), giving up\n", l_current_part, l_num_parts );
|
||||||
|
p_j2k->m_specific_param.m_decoder.m_last_tile_part = 1;
|
||||||
|
return OPJ_FALSE;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
l_tcp->m_nb_tile_parts = l_num_parts;
|
l_tcp->m_nb_tile_parts = l_num_parts;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue