Even Rouault ac375ac9f5 Partial revert BPC related check of #975 (#979) ... PR #975 introduced a check that rejects images that have different bit depth/sign per compoment in SIZ marker if the JP2 IHDR box has BPC != 255 This didn't work properly if decoding a .j2k file since the new bit added in opj_cp_t wasn't initialized to the right value. For clarity, tThis new bit has also been renamed to allow_different_bit_depth_sign But looking closer at the code, it seems we were already tolerant to inconsistencies. For example we parsed a JP2 BPCC box even if BPC != 255 (just a warning is emitted) So failing hard in opj_j2k_read_siz() wouldn't be very inconsistent, and that alone cannot protect against other issues, so just emit a warning if BPC != 255 and the SIZ marker contains different bit depth/sign per component. Note: we could also check that the content of JP2 BPCC box is consistant with the one of the SIZ marker.		2017-08-09 11:34:08 +02:00
..
CMakeLists.txt	Avoids undefined shift behaviour in m_dc_level_shift computation	2017-07-27 18:10:03 +02:00
checkmd5refs.cmake	Use lowercase for cmake commands consistenly	2016-05-02 16:05:41 +02:00
md5refs.txt	Partial revert BPC related check of #975 (#979)	2017-08-09 11:34:08 +02:00
test_suite.ctest.in	Partial revert BPC related check of #975 (#979)	2017-08-09 11:34:08 +02:00