Next attempt to fix the previous bug.
This commit is contained in:
parent
d788c58e6b
commit
bb3b7927f3
|
@ -139,6 +139,10 @@ if (mcontext != NULL)
|
||||||
arguments.callout_data = mcontext->callout_data;
|
arguments.callout_data = mcontext->callout_data;
|
||||||
arguments.limit_match = (mcontext->match_limit < re->limit_match)?
|
arguments.limit_match = (mcontext->match_limit < re->limit_match)?
|
||||||
mcontext->match_limit : re->limit_match;
|
mcontext->match_limit : re->limit_match;
|
||||||
|
if (mcontext->jit_callback != NULL)
|
||||||
|
jit_stack = mcontext->jit_callback(mcontext->jit_callback_data);
|
||||||
|
else
|
||||||
|
jit_stack = (pcre2_jit_stack *)mcontext->jit_callback_data;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
else
|
else
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
|
@ -146,6 +150,7 @@ else
|
||||||
arguments.callout_data = NULL;
|
arguments.callout_data = NULL;
|
||||||
arguments.limit_match = (MATCH_LIMIT < re->limit_match)?
|
arguments.limit_match = (MATCH_LIMIT < re->limit_match)?
|
||||||
MATCH_LIMIT : re->limit_match;
|
MATCH_LIMIT : re->limit_match;
|
||||||
|
jit_stack = NULL;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/* JIT only need two offsets for each ovector entry. Hence
|
/* JIT only need two offsets for each ovector entry. Hence
|
||||||
|
@ -156,10 +161,6 @@ if (oveccount > max_oveccount)
|
||||||
oveccount = max_oveccount;
|
oveccount = max_oveccount;
|
||||||
arguments.oveccount = oveccount << 1;
|
arguments.oveccount = oveccount << 1;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (mcontext && mcontext->jit_callback != NULL)
|
|
||||||
jit_stack = mcontext->jit_callback(mcontext->jit_callback_data);
|
|
||||||
else
|
|
||||||
jit_stack = (pcre2_jit_stack *)mcontext->jit_callback_data;
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
convert_executable_func.executable_func = functions->executable_funcs[index];
|
convert_executable_func.executable_func = functions->executable_funcs[index];
|
||||||
if (jit_stack != NULL)
|
if (jit_stack != NULL)
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue