Fix *THEN verbs in lookahead assertions in JIT.

This commit is contained in:
Zoltán Herczeg 2020-01-11 15:28:15 +00:00
parent 03720de840
commit bf4cd8212f
3 changed files with 5 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -39,6 +39,8 @@ assertion could always be wrapped in a repeated group. The only restriction
that is now imposed is that an unlimited maximum is changed to one more than
the minimum.
10. Fix *THEN verbs in lookahead assertions in JIT.
Version 10.34 21-November-2019
------------------------------

View File

@ -9597,7 +9597,8 @@ if (opcode == OP_ASSERT || opcode == OP_ASSERTBACK)
}
else
{
OP1(SLJIT_MOV, STR_PTR, 0, SLJIT_MEM1(STACK_TOP), 0);
SLJIT_ASSERT(extrasize == 3);
OP1(SLJIT_MOV, STR_PTR, 0, SLJIT_MEM1(STACK_TOP), STACK(-1));
OP1(SLJIT_MOV, SLJIT_MEM1(STACK_TOP), STACK(0), bra == OP_BRAZERO ? STR_PTR : SLJIT_IMM, 0);
}
}

View File

@ -860,6 +860,7 @@ static struct regression_test_case regression_test_cases[] = {
{ MU, A, 0, 0, "(?(?!a(*THEN)b)ad|add)", "add" },
{ MU, A, 0, 0 | F_NOMATCH, "(?(?=a)a(*THEN)b|ad)", "ad" },
{ MU, A, 0, 0, "(?!(?(?=a)ab|b(*THEN)d))bn|bnn", "bnn" },
{ MU, A, 0, 0, "(?=(*THEN: ))* ", " " },
/* Recurse and control verbs. */
{ MU, A, 0, 0, "(a(*ACCEPT)b){0}a(?1)b", "aacaabb" },