.TH PCRE2COMPAT 3 "15 March 2015" "PCRE2 10.20"
.SH NAME
PCRE2 - Perl-compatible regular expressions (revised API)
.SH "DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PCRE2 AND PERL"
.rs
.sp
This document describes the differences in the ways that PCRE2 and Perl handle
regular expressions. The differences described here are with respect to Perl
versions 5.10 and above.
.P
1. PCRE2 has only a subset of Perl's Unicode support. Details of what it does
have are given in the
.\" HREF
\fBpcre2unicode\fP
.\"
page.
.P
2. PCRE2 allows repeat quantifiers only on parenthesized assertions, but they
do not mean what you might think. For example, (?!a){3} does not assert that
the next three characters are not "a". It just asserts that the next character
is not "a" three times (in principle: PCRE2 optimizes this to run the assertion
just once). Perl allows repeat quantifiers on other assertions such as \eb, but
these do not seem to have any use.
.P
3. Capturing subpatterns that occur inside negative lookahead assertions are
counted, but their entries in the offsets vector are never set. Perl sometimes
(but not always) sets its numerical variables from inside negative assertions.
.P
4. The following Perl escape sequences are not supported: \el, \eu, \eL,
\eU, and \eN when followed by a character name or Unicode value. (\eN on its
own, matching a non-newline character, is supported.) In fact these are
implemented by Perl's general string-handling and are not part of its pattern
matching engine. If any of these are encountered by PCRE2, an error is
generated by default. However, if the PCRE2_ALT_BSUX option is set,
\eU and \eu are interpreted as ECMAScript interprets them.
.P
5. The Perl escape sequences \ep, \eP, and \eX are supported only if PCRE2 is
built with Unicode support. The properties that can be tested with \ep and \eP
are limited to the general category properties such as Lu and Nd, script names
such as Greek or Han, and the derived properties Any and L&. PCRE2 does support
the Cs (surrogate) property, which Perl does not; the Perl documentation says
"Because Perl hides the need for the user to understand the internal
representation of Unicode characters, there is no need to implement the
somewhat messy concept of surrogates."
.P
6. PCRE2 does support the \eQ...\eE escape for quoting substrings. Characters
in between are treated as literals. This is slightly different from Perl in
that $ and @ are also handled as literals inside the quotes. In Perl, they
cause variable interpolation (but of course PCRE2 does not have variables).
Note the following examples:
.sp
Pattern PCRE2 matches Perl matches
.sp
.\" JOIN
\eQabc$xyz\eE abc$xyz abc followed by the
contents of $xyz
\eQabc\e$xyz\eE abc\e$xyz abc\e$xyz
\eQabc\eE\e$\eQxyz\eE abc$xyz abc$xyz
.sp
The \eQ...\eE sequence is recognized both inside and outside character classes.
.P
7. Fairly obviously, PCRE2 does not support the (?{code}) and (??{code})
constructions. However, there is support for recursive patterns. This is not
available in Perl 5.8, but it is in Perl 5.10. Also, the PCRE2 "callout"
feature allows an external function to be called during pattern matching. See
the
.\" HREF
\fBpcre2callout\fP
.\"
documentation for details.
.P
8. Subroutine calls (whether recursive or not) are treated as atomic groups.
Atomic recursion is like Python, but unlike Perl. Captured values that are set
outside a subroutine call can be referenced from inside in PCRE2, but not in
Perl. There is a discussion that explains these differences in more detail in
the
.\" HTML
.\"
section on recursion differences from Perl
.\"
in the
.\" HREF
\fBpcre2pattern\fP
.\"
page.
.P
9. If any of the backtracking control verbs are used in a subpattern that is
called as a subroutine (whether or not recursively), their effect is confined
to that subpattern; it does not extend to the surrounding pattern. This is not
always the case in Perl. In particular, if (*THEN) is present in a group that
is called as a subroutine, its action is limited to that group, even if the
group does not contain any | characters. Note that such subpatterns are
processed as anchored at the point where they are tested.
.P
10. If a pattern contains more than one backtracking control verb, the first
one that is backtracked onto acts. For example, in the pattern
A(*COMMIT)B(*PRUNE)C a failure in B triggers (*COMMIT), but a failure in C
triggers (*PRUNE). Perl's behaviour is more complex; in many cases it is the
same as PCRE2, but there are examples where it differs.
.P
11. Most backtracking verbs in assertions have their normal actions. They are
not confined to the assertion.
.P
12. There are some differences that are concerned with the settings of captured
strings when part of a pattern is repeated. For example, matching "aba" against
the pattern /^(a(b)?)+$/ in Perl leaves $2 unset, but in PCRE2 it is set to
"b".
.P
13. PCRE2's handling of duplicate subpattern numbers and duplicate subpattern
names is not as general as Perl's. This is a consequence of the fact the PCRE2
works internally just with numbers, using an external table to translate
between numbers and names. In particular, a pattern such as (?|(?A)|(?