.TH PCRE2COMPAT 3 "30 September 2016" "PCRE2 10.23" .SH NAME PCRE2 - Perl-compatible regular expressions (revised API) .SH "DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PCRE2 AND PERL" .rs .sp This document describes the differences in the ways that PCRE2 and Perl handle regular expressions. The differences described here are with respect to Perl versions 5.10 and above. .P 1. PCRE2 has only a subset of Perl's Unicode support. Details of what it does have are given in the .\" HREF \fBpcre2unicode\fP .\" page. .P 2. PCRE2 allows repeat quantifiers only on parenthesized assertions, but they do not mean what you might think. For example, (?!a){3} does not assert that the next three characters are not "a". It just asserts that the next character is not "a" three times (in principle: PCRE2 optimizes this to run the assertion just once). Perl allows repeat quantifiers on other assertions such as \eb, but these do not seem to have any use. .P 3. Capturing subpatterns that occur inside negative lookahead assertions are counted, but their entries in the offsets vector are never set. Perl sometimes (but not always) sets its numerical variables from inside negative assertions. .P 4. The following Perl escape sequences are not supported: \el, \eu, \eL, \eU, and \eN when followed by a character name or Unicode value. (\eN on its own, matching a non-newline character, is supported.) In fact these are implemented by Perl's general string-handling and are not part of its pattern matching engine. If any of these are encountered by PCRE2, an error is generated by default. However, if the PCRE2_ALT_BSUX option is set, \eU and \eu are interpreted as ECMAScript interprets them. .P 5. The Perl escape sequences \ep, \eP, and \eX are supported only if PCRE2 is built with Unicode support. The properties that can be tested with \ep and \eP are limited to the general category properties such as Lu and Nd, script names such as Greek or Han, and the derived properties Any and L&. PCRE2 does support the Cs (surrogate) property, which Perl does not; the Perl documentation says "Because Perl hides the need for the user to understand the internal representation of Unicode characters, there is no need to implement the somewhat messy concept of surrogates." .P 6. PCRE2 does support the \eQ...\eE escape for quoting substrings. Characters in between are treated as literals. This is slightly different from Perl in that $ and @ are also handled as literals inside the quotes. In Perl, they cause variable interpolation (but of course PCRE2 does not have variables). Note the following examples: .sp Pattern PCRE2 matches Perl matches .sp .\" JOIN \eQabc$xyz\eE abc$xyz abc followed by the contents of $xyz \eQabc\e$xyz\eE abc\e$xyz abc\e$xyz \eQabc\eE\e$\eQxyz\eE abc$xyz abc$xyz .sp The \eQ...\eE sequence is recognized both inside and outside character classes. .P 7. Fairly obviously, PCRE2 does not support the (?{code}) and (??{code}) constructions. However, there is support for recursive patterns. This is not available in Perl 5.8, but it is in Perl 5.10. Also, the PCRE2 "callout" feature allows an external function to be called during pattern matching. See the .\" HREF \fBpcre2callout\fP .\" documentation for details. .P 8. Subroutine calls (whether recursive or not) are treated as atomic groups. Atomic recursion is like Python, but unlike Perl. Captured values that are set outside a subroutine call can be referenced from inside in PCRE2, but not in Perl. There is a discussion that explains these differences in more detail in the .\" HTML .\" section on recursion differences from Perl .\" in the .\" HREF \fBpcre2pattern\fP .\" page. .P 9. If any of the backtracking control verbs are used in a subpattern that is called as a subroutine (whether or not recursively), their effect is confined to that subpattern; it does not extend to the surrounding pattern. This is not always the case in Perl. In particular, if (*THEN) is present in a group that is called as a subroutine, its action is limited to that group, even if the group does not contain any | characters. Note that such subpatterns are processed as anchored at the point where they are tested. .P 10. If a pattern contains more than one backtracking control verb, the first one that is backtracked onto acts. For example, in the pattern A(*COMMIT)B(*PRUNE)C a failure in B triggers (*COMMIT), but a failure in C triggers (*PRUNE). Perl's behaviour is more complex; in many cases it is the same as PCRE2, but there are cases where it differs. .P 11. Most backtracking verbs in assertions have their normal actions. They are not confined to the assertion. .P 12. There are some differences that are concerned with the settings of captured strings when part of a pattern is repeated. For example, matching "aba" against the pattern /^(a(b)?)+$/ in Perl leaves $2 unset, but in PCRE2 it is set to "b". .P 13. PCRE2's handling of duplicate subpattern numbers and duplicate subpattern names is not as general as Perl's. This is a consequence of the fact the PCRE2 works internally just with numbers, using an external table to translate between numbers and names. In particular, a pattern such as (?|(?A)|(?