walkero
/
physfs
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Checking if this #pragma pack works better on gcc 2.95.

This commit is contained in:
Ryan C. Gordon 2017-07-09 20:46:31 -04:00
parent 2dbd784cc1
commit 53c81e216a
1 changed files with 3 additions and 4 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

7
src/archiver_iso9660.c
View File

@ -34,8 +34,6 @@
/* cache files smaller than this completely in memory */
#define ISO9660_FULLCACHEMAXSIZE 2048
/* !!! FIXME: this is going to cause trouble. */
#pragma pack(push) /* push current alignment to stack */
#pragma pack(1) /* set alignment to 1 byte boundary */
/* This is the format as defined by the standard
@ -194,7 +192,8 @@ typedef struct
/** further fields not implemented */
} ISO9660ExtAttributeRec;
#pragma pack(pop) /* restore original alignment from stack */
#pragma pack() /* restore original alignment from stack */
typedef struct
{
@ -218,7 +217,7 @@ typedef struct __ISO9660FileHandle
PHYSFS_uint64 len);
int (*seek)(struct __ISO9660FileHandle *filehandle, PHYSFS_sint64 offset);
void (*close)(struct __ISO9660FileHandle *filehandle);
/* !!! FIXME: anonymouse union is going to cause problems. */
/* !!! FIXME: anonymous union is going to cause problems. */
union
{
/* !!! FIXME: just use a memory PHYSFS_Io here, unify all this code. */