4baf221a6b
misra; implemented rule 21.2
2021-07-22 20:39:04 +02:00
388b7a0fae
misra; implemented rule 20.12
2021-07-22 19:51:31 +02:00
a65fa9b682
misra; implement rule 20.11
2021-07-22 16:11:25 +02:00
3ba4696f4f
misra; implement rule 20.9
2021-07-22 12:08:51 +02:00
74ab8f1a48
misra; implemented rule 20.8
2021-07-22 08:46:28 +02:00
d2843b70ca
misra; implement rule 10.7
2021-07-21 19:18:12 +02:00
fb8d6daf79
misra; implement rule 10.5
2021-07-21 15:25:01 +02:00
f5fe562050
misra; improved checking of 10.3
2021-07-21 10:56:17 +02:00
4428efbd2b
misra; improved essential type for composite expressions
2021-07-21 08:20:15 +02:00
b409d4a598
misra; implement rule 16.1
2021-07-20 20:40:42 +02:00
e72e59f934
misra; implement rule 12.4
2021-07-20 19:50:31 +02:00
937146127a
misra; fix essential type for integer literals
2021-07-20 18:27:49 +02:00
b320a092d0
misra; fix essential type for char literals
2021-07-20 16:39:59 +02:00
6f7722873e
CI; specify unix64 platform when running misra-test
2021-07-20 12:23:16 +02:00
d467505696
misra; update essential type for variables
2021-07-19 17:12:24 +02:00
657d530fa1
misra; implement rule 10.3
2021-07-19 14:54:17 +02:00
d1fe34e167
misra; implement rule 8.10
2021-07-18 21:18:07 +02:00
5f548a4b6c
misra; implement rule 8.9
2021-07-18 10:31:52 +02:00
59c797c776
misra; implement rule 8.8
2021-07-17 23:38:29 +02:00
e4ae4471e8
misra; implement rule 11.2
2021-07-11 20:55:54 +02:00
9d5c65fcce
CI; Improved testing of misra addon
2021-07-11 17:24:14 +02:00
754d648b0f
misra; implement rule 11.1
2021-07-11 07:50:13 +02:00
009c144455
misra; implement rule 8.4
2021-07-10 20:10:44 +02:00
4ecf3ccd17
misra: implement rule 22.5
2021-07-07 23:00:12 +02:00
00a9671f46
misra: implement 8.1
2021-07-07 13:34:55 +02:00
6f389014f1
cppcheckdata: Fix crash on an empty union ( #3326 )
2021-07-06 17:01:58 +02:00
426117a30d
misra: Improve warning messages for rule 8.2 when the missing arguments are on the next line ( #3320 )
...
This makes it easier for the user to find the violation.
Suggested in the forum: https://sourceforge.net/p/cppcheck/discussion/development/thread/801dc07e59/#a1a8/d3e9/c455/8915/747c/2525/0eb8/0f7d
2021-07-01 21:08:40 +02:00
10123b4ad2
misra: Emit more accurate warnings for unused arguments in rule 2.7 ( #3314 )
...
Make the MISRA addon emit extra warnings for unused arguments placed in
lines other than the function definition. This makes it easier for the
user to find violations.
2021-06-29 11:17:38 +02:00
a2cb9f17c1
misra: Don't consider variadic arguments as the violation of rule 2.7 ( #3315 )
...
The MISRA 2012 standard does not say anything about variadic functions
in the definition of rule 2.7. Therefore, these cases should be
considered as false positives.
2021-06-29 08:46:35 +02:00
62dbe2eb2f
misra: Fix false positives for rule 8.2 ( #3311 )
...
Reported in the forum: https://sourceforge.net/p/cppcheck/discussion/development/thread/801dc07e59/?page=1&limit=25#a1a8
2021-06-27 22:57:50 +02:00
b89f5fbeff
misra: Fix 8.2 false positives ( #3309 )
...
* misra: Fix 8.2 false positives
Fix false positives in rule 8.2 that occurred in cases when we have a
function definition and declaration in the same file.
For example, the following code generated false positives before this
commit:
```
void f(uint8_t * const x);
void f(uint8_t * const x)
{ (void)x; }
```
We need to distinguish the declaration and the definition, so the dump
file generation routine was extended to keep token where the definition
of the function. The analysis in the addon also been improved.
Closes Trac issue: https://trac.cppcheck.net/ticket/10219
2021-06-27 10:51:32 +02:00
452c92494e
misra: Fix 8.2 false positives ( #3306 )
...
Type declaration on the next line is not allowed in rule 8.2. But we
need to make sure that the files of the checked files are the same.
Reported on the forum: https://sourceforge.net/p/cppcheck/discussion/development/thread/801dc07e59/#32c3/e90b/293e/39df/85b3/b821/e0c3
2021-06-25 16:06:29 +02:00
79f59d8f39
misra: Fixed crash with struct fields with unknown types on 9.x rules ( #3305 )
...
This fixes the crash on with struct fields containing unknown types
reported on the forum:
https://sourceforge.net/p/cppcheck/discussion/general/thread/d64551cc55/#5f0f
The suggested patch doesn't handle the cases when there are struct
fields with arrays containing unknown types. So the addon will not
generate warnings in these cases. The problem is that Cppcheck doesn't
generate valueType-pointer information for unknown types in the dump
file. When adding this in symboldatabase.cpp, MISRA addon will generate
a lot of false positives because we depend on the null value of
valueType.
So I suppose it better to left this as is, to don't break the addon for
such rare cases.
2021-06-24 08:29:27 +02:00
e3b7ceec7e
Fix issue where misra 9_x evaluation crashes on some undefined structs with nested initialisers ( #3290 )
2021-06-04 17:19:40 +02:00
7a009fece0
misra: Add support for expected suppressions in header files in `-verify` mode ( #3252 )
...
This commit allows to specify expected suppressions in the included
header files. This is necessary to verify MISRA checkers, which make
requirements for header files. For example, Rule 8.2 requires adding
prototypes for each function to the header files.
2021-05-08 10:27:31 +02:00
f7d0bf7a59
Refactoring; Reuse simplecpp::characterLiteralToLL
2021-05-02 13:44:37 +02:00
e1bfd369db
misra: Fix false positives for rule 7.3 ( #3236 )
...
Fix false positives for the identifiers that contain 'ul' in their names.
Reported on the forum: https://sourceforge.net/p/cppcheck/discussion/general/thread/c326538221/
2021-04-27 19:42:34 +02:00
fce3db8b7d
misra: Fixed a crash in rule 8.2 ( #3208 )
...
Due to incorrect indentation, we return "None" instead of an empty list,
which causes the crash.
The problem was reported on the forum: https://sourceforge.net/p/cppcheck/discussion/general/thread/e146b8d779/
2021-04-13 10:09:42 +02:00
5077663684
Fix issue 9979: false positive: containerOutOfBounds with conditional resize ( #3136 )
2021-03-30 14:02:28 +02:00
9786f1c34b
Suggested implementation for rule 8.2 ( #3169 )
2021-03-25 08:25:43 +01:00
390a5af064
misra.py: Fix crashes on obsolete GCC syntax for struct initialization ( #3175 )
...
* misra.py: Fix crashes on obsolete GCC syntax for struct initialization
* Added expected violations
2021-03-20 13:59:39 +01:00
ebf54ac53e
Misra; Remove 12.4 because the check is not implemented properly
2021-02-25 22:11:13 +01:00
82f51bd523
misra: Fix crash on rule 9.x ( #3024 )
...
Closes ticket #10084
2021-01-07 15:04:12 +01:00
d4860f500a
MISRA 9.2 to 9.5 ( #2954 )
2020-12-16 17:28:54 +01:00
9029fff59d
Fixed #9993 (false positive: misra-c2012-9.2) ( #2908 )
2020-11-18 10:50:35 +01:00
0e7ec1eddf
Fixed #9988 (false positive: misra-c2012-9.2) ( #2904 )
2020-11-16 17:31:00 +01:00
4d3f76b63c
MISRA rule 9.2 The initializer for an aggregate or union shall be enclosed in braces ( #2899 )
2020-11-16 09:27:17 +01:00
3a91b998d6
MISRA rule 10.2 Expressions of essentially character type in additions and subtraction ( #2897 )
2020-11-12 11:37:28 +01:00
9d70926fcd
MISRA rule 15.4 Only one break/goto from iteration statement ( #2892 )
2020-11-09 15:11:08 +01:00
9cbb09076c
misra.py: Fix R7.2 crash on va_args ( #2886 )
2020-11-05 23:54:12 +01:00
Daniel Marjamäki
Georgiy Komarov
Ivar Andreas Bonsaksen
Paul Fultz II
Lars Even Almaas
kskjerve