* Use lifetime analysis for pointers as well
* Fix issue 1143: Pointer to local array
* Update message when using pointers
* Avoid infinite loop in tracing lifetimes
* Inital valueflow lifetime checker
* Forward values
* Add initial tests
* Fix deplicate messages
* Fix traversing nested lambdas
* Turn test case into a todo
* Skip if returning a container
* Fix FP when using references
* Add missing header
* Fix FP from broken scopes
* Fix FP with static variable
* Add test for more FPs
* Parse lambda functions
* Check for capture by value
* Add tests for using a container and lambda together
* Fix cppcheck errors
* Add test for nextAfterAstRightmostLeaf
* Add valueflow tests
* Update error message
* Check for correct lambda token
* Improve error path reporting
* Fix hang when parsing arrays that look almlost like lambdas
* Add valueflow for terminating conditions
* Add valueflow test
* Dont check for same expressions for now to avoid double diagnostics
* Check nesting
* Add more tests
* Ensure conditions happen in order
* Check for null
* Add error path
* Support same expression check as well
* Use early continue
* Skip checking the same token
* Avoid double condtion diagnosis
* Fix FP when in switch statements
* Fix FP when time function
* Skip conditional escapes
* Use simpleMatch
* Fix naming
* Fix typo
* Add check for return value of boolean function
The rule for converting an integer to a boolean is that 0 is mapped to
false and everything else is mapped to true. There is nothing wrong with
the following code (according to the standards):
bool f()
{
return -1;
}
and neither gcc nor clang will warn about it. However, it's a bit
confusing. This commit adds a check that warns when a value other than 0
or 1 is returned from a boolean function (similar to the existing check
that functions with boolean arguments are only passed 0 or 1). Since the
code is perfectly legal, set the severity to "Style".
* Use early continue and remove some braces
* Add testcase with multiple returns
* Avoid null pointer dereference in case of return without operand
* Skip lambdas
Add TODO-test cases that shows FPs when the return type of lambdas are
specified explicitly (this is a problem with findLambdaEndToken).
* Enable testcases
* findLambdaEndToken: Add tests
* Add handling of explicit return in findLambdaEndToken()
* Use AST in findLambdaEndToken()
* Fix ast when lambda is mutable
Paul Fultz II
Daniel Marjamäki
IOBYTE
orbitcowboy
rikardfalkeborn
amai