A missing definition for g_assert_cmp*() causes syntax errors if code
like g_assert_cmpint(a, ==, b); is encountered.
The function g_hash_table_iter_replace() does not have to be marked
with leak-ignore since the memory could be freed later if corresponding
functions are present in the GHashTable. Since we can not know if this
is the case we have to assume that the memory is freed to avoid false
positives. The same is true for g_hash_table_insert() and
g_hash_table_replace().
fb36889d29