There's nothing assymetrical about how we match them. Previously we "considered"
them half-open because the OS/2 spec had usLowerOpticalPointSize as inclusive
and usUpperOpticalPointSize as exclusive. But we do not respect that.
Note that the parsing code accepts both anyway, because of the way our sscanf()
usage is written...
This is for clients to passthru font variation settings. Modeled
similar to FC_FONT_FEATURES. Each element value is for one axis
settings, eg. "abcd=2.3" where 'abcd' is the OpenType Font Variations
axis tag.
Needs docs update.
Use FcCompareNumber(). The FcCompareSize() returns 0 ("perfect match")
if v2 is zero. I cannot think of a use-case for this. The code has been
there from initial commit in 2002. I suppose back then Keith had a use
for size=0 to mean scalable or something. Anyway, remove and see.
Like FcFreeTypeQuery(), but adds patterns for all fonts found, including named
instances of variable fonts. If id is -1, then all collection faces are queried.
Returns number of fonts added.
This merges the same face loop that was in fc-query. and fcdir.c.
Needs documentation update.
Ignore control chars for purpose of emptiness check. I *think* U+0000 and U+000D
are rendered empty, but since they are not in blanks, for now just ignore them.
The FT_Select_Size() call is important for bitmap-only fonts.
Put it back. It was removed in e327c4e54544dac5415e8864e80d6b75a0c900fd
Remove some unused abstractions.
Basically we trust the font cmap table now...
New numbers:
behdad:src 0$ time fc-scan ~/fonts/ > after-noloca
real 0m55.788s
user 0m15.836s
sys 0m17.008s
behdad:src 0$
behdad:src 0$ time fc-scan ~/fonts/ > after-noloca
real 0m24.794s
user 0m12.164s
sys 0m12.420s
Before this change it was:
behdad:src 130$ time fc-scan ~/fonts/ > after
real 0m24.825s
user 0m12.408s
sys 0m11.356s
Not any faster! I suppose most time is being spent in loading cmap and advances now.
I'll see about loading hmtx ourselves.
With I/O numbers. Before:
behdad:src 0$ \time fc-scan ~/fonts/ > after
11.66user 12.17system 0:24.03elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 487684maxresident)k
2320inputs+50480outputs (21major+11468549minor)pagefaults 0swaps
after:
behdad:src 130$ \time fc-scan ~/fonts/ > after-noloca
11.94user 11.99system 0:24.11elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 487704maxresident)k
16inputs+50688outputs (0major+11464386minor)pagefaults 0swaps
We are definitely doing a lot less I/O. Surprisingly less in fact. I don't get it.
Part of https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64766#c47
This is the approach introduced in
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64766#c30
Testing it with 11GB worth of stuff, before/after:
behdad:src 130$ time fc-scan ~/fonts/ > before
real 2m18.428s
user 1m17.008s
sys 0m20.576s
behdad:src 0$ time fc-scan ~/fonts/ > after
real 1m12.130s
user 0m18.180s
sys 0m19.952s
Running the after case a second time is significantly faster:
behdad:src 130$ time fc-scan ~/fonts/ > after
real 0m24.825s
user 0m12.408s
sys 0m11.356s
Next I'm going to try to not even read loca...
Behdad Esfahbod
Florian Müllner
David Kaspar [Dee'Kej]
Akira TAGOH